4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Obtaining consent for non-psychiatric treatment of persons detained under mental health legislation in Australia and New Zealand: is there cross-jurisdictional consistency?

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It is increasingly recognised that persons with mental illness experience physical health issues at greater rates than the general population and that there are significant barriers to accessing appropriate treatment. One less obvious barrier to appropriate care may be the law. This review examines the legal regimes within Australia and New Zealand that regulate consent for medical and surgical treatment for persons detained under mental health legislation. The review begins with a brief overview of concepts of consent and capacity then examines the law with regards to consent for non-psychiatric treatment for persons detained in psychiatric facilities. The complexity and cross-jurisdictional consistency is considered and potential future directions and possibilities for reform are discussed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Australas Psychiatry
          Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists
          SAGE Publications
          1440-1665
          1039-8562
          Oct 2018
          : 26
          : 5
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Psychiatry Registrar, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
          Article
          10.1177/1039856218797444
          30226104
          336600c0-9e3c-4990-952f-ca051d9fc491
          History

          capacity,consent,substitute decision-making
          capacity, consent, substitute decision-making

          Comments

          Comment on this article