8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Influence of damming on anuran species richness in riparian areas: A test of the serial discontinuity concept

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Almost all large rivers worldwide are fragmented by dams, and their impacts have been modeled using the serial discontinuity concept ( SDC), a series of predictions regarding responses of key biotic and abiotic variables. We evaluated the effects of damming on anuran communities along a 245‐km river corridor by conducting repeated, time‐constrained anuran calling surveys at 42 locations along the Broad and Pacolet Rivers in South Carolina, USA. Using a hierarchical Bayesian analysis, we test the biodiversity prediction of the SDC (modified for floodplain rivers) by evaluating anuran occupancy and species diversity relative to dams and degree of urbanized land use. The mean response of the anuran community indicated that occupancy and species richness were maximized when sites were farther downstream from dams. Sites at the farthest distances downstream of dams (47.5 km) had an estimated ~3 more species than those just below dams. Similarly, species‐specific occupancy estimates showed a trend of higher occupancy downstream from dams. Therefore, using empirical estimation within the context of a 245‐km river riparian landscape, our study supports SDC predictions for a meandering river. We demonstrate that with increasing distance downstream from dams, riparian anuran communities have higher species richness. Reduced species richness immediately downstream of dams is likely driven by alterations in flow regime that reduce or eliminate flows which sustain riparian wetlands that serve as anuran breeding habitat. Therefore, to maintain anuran biodiversity, we suggest that flow regulation should be managed to ensure water releases inundate riparian wetlands during amphibian breeding seasons and aseasonal releases, which can displace adults, larvae, and eggs, are avoided. These outcomes could be achieved by emulating pre‐dam seasonal discharge data, mirroring discharge of an undammed tributary within the focal watershed, or by basing real‐time flow releases on current environmental conditions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.

          The flow regime is regarded by many aquatic ecologists to be the key driver of river and floodplain wetland ecosystems. We have focused this literature review around four key principles to highlight the important mechanisms that link hydrology and aquatic biodiversity and to illustrate the consequent impacts of altered flow regimes: Firstly, flow is a major determinant of physical habitat in streams, which in turn is a major determinant of biotic composition; Secondly, aquatic species have evolved life history strategies primarily in direct response to the natural flow regimes; Thirdly, maintenance of natural patterns of longitudinal and lateral connectivity is essential to the viability of populations of many riverine species; Finally, the invasion and success of exotic and introduced species in rivers is facilitated by the alteration of flow regimes. The impacts of flow change are manifest across broad taxonomic groups including riverine plants, invertebrates, and fish. Despite growing recognition of these relationships, ecologists still struggle to predict and quantify biotic responses to altered flow regimes. One obvious difficulty is the ability to distinguish the direct effects of modified flow regimes from impacts associated with land-use change that often accompanies water resource development. Currently, evidence about how rivers function in relation to flow regime and the flows that aquatic organisms need exists largely as a series of untested hypotheses. To overcome these problems, aquatic science needs to move quickly into a manipulative or experimental phase, preferably with the aims of restoration and measuring ecosystem response.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adaptation to natural flow regimes.

            Floods and droughts are important features of most running water ecosystems, but the alteration of natural flow regimes by recent human activities, such as dam building, raises questions related to both evolution and conservation. Among organisms inhabiting running waters, what adaptations exist for surviving floods and droughts? How will the alteration of the frequency, timing and duration of flow extremes affect flood- and drought-adapted organisms? How rapidly can populations evolve in response to altered flow regimes? Here, we identify three modes of adaptation (life history, behavioral and morphological) that plants and animals use to survive floods and/or droughts. The mode of adaptation that an organism has determines its vulnerability to different kinds of flow regime alteration. The rate of evolution in response to flow regime alteration remains an open question. Because humans have now altered the flow regimes of most rivers and many streams, understanding the link between fitness and flow regime is crucial for the effective management and restoration of running water ecosystems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Estimating Size and Composition of Biological Communities by Modeling the Occurrence of Species

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jackieguzy@gmail.com
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                26 January 2018
                February 2018
                : 8
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.2018.8.issue-4 )
                : 2268-2279
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Biology University of Arkansas Fayetteville AR USA
                [ 2 ] Department of Biology Davidson College Davidson NC USA
                [ 3 ] EcoHealth Alliance New York NY USA
                [ 4 ] Graduate Group in Ecology University of California ‐ Davis Davis CA USA
                [ 5 ] Western Ecological Research Center U.S. Geological Survey Dixon CA USA
                [ 6 ] Department of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Kentucky Lexington KY USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jacquelyn C. Guzy, Department of Biology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.

                Email: jackieguzy@ 123456gmail.com

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2648-398X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1153-5356
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5535-6528
                Article
                ECE33750
                10.1002/ece3.3750
                5817157
                29468042
                332f5433-928e-4e79-a9cc-6d754f9b5174
                © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 July 2017
                : 01 November 2017
                : 26 November 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Pages: 12, Words: 9181
                Funding
                Funded by: South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
                Award ID: Broad River Mitigation Trust Fund
                Funded by: Duke Endowment
                Award ID: Davidson Research Initiative
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                ece33750
                February 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.3.2.2 mode:remove_FC converted:18.02.2018

                Evolutionary Biology
                amphibian,detection,downstream,floodplain,flow regulation,hierarchical bayesian analysis,occupancy,urbanization

                Comments

                Comment on this article