26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Future Developments of Medical Informatics from the Viewpoint of Networked Clinical Research : Interoperability and Integration

      ,
      Methods of Information in Medicine
      Georg Thieme Verlag KG

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Objectives: To be prepared for future developments, such as enabling support of rapid innovation transfer and personalized medicine concepts, interoperability of basic research, clinical research and medical care is essential. It is the objective of our paper to give an overview of developments, indicate problem areas and to specify future requirements.

          Methods: In this paper recent and ongoing large-scaled activities related to interoper-ability and integration of networked clinical research are described and evaluated. The following main topics are covered: necessity for general IT-conception, open source/open community approach, acceptance of eSource in clinical research, interoperability of the electronic health record and electronic data capture and harmonization and bridging of standards for technical and semantic inter-operability.

          Results: National infrastructures and programmes have been set up to provide general IT-conceptions to guide planning and development of software tools (e.g. TMF, ca BIG, NIHR). The concept of open research described by transparency achieved through open access, open data, open communication and open source software is becoming more and more important in clinical research infrastructure development (e.g. ca BIG, ePCRN). Meanwhile visions and rules for using eSource in clinical research are available, with the potential to improve interoperability between the electronic health record and electronic data capture (e.g. CDISC e SDI, eClinical Forum/PhRMA EDC/eSource Taskforce). Several groups have formulated user requirements, use cases and technical frameworks to advance these issues (e.g. NHIN Slipstream-project, EHR/CR-project, IHE). In order to achieve technical and semantic interoperability, existing standards (e.g. CDISC) have to be harmonized and bridged. Major consortia have been formed to provide semantical inter-operability (e.g. HL7 RCRIM under joint leadership of HL7, CDISC and FDA, or BRIDG covering CDISC, HL7, FDA, NCI) and to provide core sets of data collection fields (CDASH).

          Conclusions: The essential tasks for medical informatics within the next ten years will now be the development and implementation of encompassing IT conceptions, strong support of the open community and open source approach, the acceptance of eSource in clinical research, the uncompromising continuity of standardization and bridging of technical standards and the widespread use of electronic health record systems.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Methods of Information in Medicine
          Methods Inf Med
          Georg Thieme Verlag KG
          0026-1270
          2511-705X
          January 17 2018
          2009
          January 17 2018
          2009
          : 48
          : 01
          : 45-54
          Article
          10.3414/ME9137
          3300496f-0be3-4297-ae1a-250e7f62a842
          © 2009
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content129

          Cited by3