3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Strong damped Lyman-α absorption in young star-forming galaxies at redshifts 9 to 11

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Primordial neutral atomic gas, mostly composed of hydrogen, is the raw material for star formation in galaxies. However, there are few direct constraints on the amount of neutral atomic hydrogen (H  i ) in galaxies at early cosmic times. We analyzed James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) near-infrared spectroscopy of distant galaxies, at redshifts ≳8. From a sample of 12 galaxies, we identified three that show strong damped Lyman-α absorption due to H  i in their local surroundings. The galaxies are located at spectroscopic redshifts of 8.8, 10.2, and 11.4, corresponding to 400 to 600 million years after the Big Bang. They have H  i column densities ≳10 22 cm −2 , which is an order of magnitude higher than expected for a fully neutral intergalactic medium, and constitute a gas-rich population of young star-forming galaxies.

          Editor’s summary

          Gas in galaxies provides the raw material for star formation. Galaxies in the early Universe are seen to be forming stars rapidly (see the Perspective by Scarlata), but the amount of gas they contain is difficult to determine observationally. Heintz et al . analyzed near-infrared spectroscopy of 12 galaxies at redshifts greater than eight, equivalent to less than 600 million years after the Big Bang. They identified three galaxies with characteristic rest-frame ultraviolet absorption caused by neutral hydrogen gas located in and around the galaxy. The high column densities of gas are sufficient to sustain the rapid star formation occurring in those galaxies, but only for a short period. —Keith T. Smith

          Related collections

          Most cited references85

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            emcee: The MCMC Hammer

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters

              We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, combining information from the temperature and polarization maps and the lensing reconstruction. Compared to the 2015 results, improved measurements of large-scale polarization allow the reionization optical depth to be measured with higher precision, leading to significant gains in the precision of other correlated parameters. Improved modelling of the small-scale polarization leads to more robust constraints on many parameters, with residual modelling uncertainties estimated to affect them only at the 0.5 σ level. We find good consistency with the standard spatially-flat 6-parameter ΛCDM cosmology having a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted “base ΛCDM” in this paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar spectral index n s = 0.965 ± 0.004, and optical depth τ = 0.054 ± 0.007 (in this abstract we quote 68% confidence regions on measured parameters and 95% on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is measured to 0.03% precision, with 100 θ * = 1.0411 ± 0.0003. These results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable, with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions. Assuming the base-ΛCDM cosmology, the inferred (model-dependent) late-Universe parameters are: Hubble constant H 0 = (67.4 ± 0.5) km s −1 Mpc −1 ; matter density parameter Ω m = 0.315 ± 0.007; and matter fluctuation amplitude σ 8 = 0.811 ± 0.006. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the base-ΛCDM model. Combining with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements (and considering single-parameter extensions) we constrain the effective extra relativistic degrees of freedom to be N eff = 2.99 ± 0.17, in agreement with the Standard Model prediction N eff = 3.046, and find that the neutrino mass is tightly constrained to ∑ m ν < 0.12 eV. The CMB spectra continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base ΛCDM at over 2 σ , which pulls some parameters that affect the lensing amplitude away from the ΛCDM model; however, this is not supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the background geometry) BAO data. The joint constraint with BAO measurements on spatial curvature is consistent with a flat universe, Ω K = 0.001 ± 0.002. Also combining with Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the dark-energy equation of state parameter is measured to be w 0 = −1.03 ± 0.03, consistent with a cosmological constant. We find no evidence for deviations from a purely power-law primordial spectrum, and combining with data from BAO, BICEP2, and Keck Array data, we place a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio r 0.002 < 0.06. Standard big-bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the helium and deuterium abundances for the base-ΛCDM cosmology are in excellent agreement with observations. The Planck base-ΛCDM results are in good agreement with BAO, SNe, and some galaxy lensing observations, but in slight tension with the Dark Energy Survey’s combined-probe results including galaxy clustering (which prefers lower fluctuation amplitudes or matter density parameters), and in significant, 3.6 σ , tension with local measurements of the Hubble constant (which prefer a higher value). Simple model extensions that can partially resolve these tensions are not favoured by the Planck data.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Science
                Science
                American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
                0036-8075
                1095-9203
                May 24 2024
                May 24 2024
                : 384
                : 6698
                : 890-894
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cosmic Dawn Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
                [2 ]Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
                [3 ]Institute of Science and Technology Austria, 2400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
                [4 ]Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, CH-1290 Versoix, Switzerland.
                [5 ]Centre for Astrophysics and Cosmology, Science Institute, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
                [6 ]School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH Leicester, UK.
                [7 ]Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
                [8 ]Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
                [9 ]Center for Astrophysical Sciences, Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
                [10 ]National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory, National Science Foundation, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.
                [11 ]Department of Astronomy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
                Article
                10.1126/science.adj0343
                32b521cc-ff97-424f-894d-08bf7b722837
                © 2024

                Free to read

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article