29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk in Type 2 Diabetes as Skeletal Complications of Inadequate Glucose Control : The Rotterdam Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE

          Individuals with type 2 diabetes have increased fracture risk despite higher bone mineral density (BMD). Our aim was to examine the influence of glucose control on skeletal complications.

          RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

          Data of 4,135 participants of the Rotterdam Study, a prospective population-based cohort, were available (mean follow-up 12.2 years). At baseline, 420 participants with type 2 diabetes were classified by glucose control (according to HbA 1c calculated from fructosamine), resulting in three comparison groups: adequately controlled diabetes (ACD; n = 203; HbA 1c <7.5%), inadequately controlled diabetes (ICD; n = 217; HbA 1c ≥7.5%), and no diabetes ( n = 3,715). Models adjusted for sex, age, height, and weight (and femoral neck BMD) were used to test for differences in bone parameters and fracture risk (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI]).

          RESULTS

          The ICD group had 1.1–5.6% higher BMD, 4.6–5.6% thicker cortices, and −1.2 to −1.8% narrower femoral necks than ACD and ND, respectively. Participants with ICD had 47–62% higher fracture risk than individuals without diabetes (HR 1.47 [1.12–1.92]) and ACD (1.62 [1.09–2.40]), whereas those with ACD had a risk similar to those without diabetes (0.91 [0.67–1.23]).

          CONCLUSIONS

          Poor glycemic control in type 2 diabetes is associated with fracture risk, high BMD, and thicker femoral cortices in narrower bones. We postulate that fragility in apparently “strong” bones in ICD can result from microcrack accumulation and/or cortical porosity, reflecting impaired bone repair.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Diabetes Care
          Diabetes Care
          diacare
          dcare
          Diabetes Care
          Diabetes Care
          American Diabetes Association
          0149-5992
          1935-5548
          June 2013
          15 May 2013
          : 36
          : 6
          : 1619-1628
          Affiliations
          [1] 1Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
          [2] 2Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
          [3] 3Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing, Netherlands Genomics Initiative, The Hague, the Netherlands
          [4] 4Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
          [5] 5Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
          Author notes
          Corresponding author: Fernando Rivadeneira, f.rivadeneira@ 123456erasmusmc.nl .
          Article
          1188
          10.2337/dc12-1188
          3661786
          23315602
          324d2897-ce7e-43f6-a10b-05085e42564b
          © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association.

          Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

          History
          : 20 June 2012
          : 3 December 2012
          Page count
          Pages: 10
          Categories
          Original Research
          Pathophysiology/Complications

          Endocrinology & Diabetes
          Endocrinology & Diabetes

          Comments

          Comment on this article