9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Site formation processes at Cenjiawan (Nihewan Basin, North China): a case study on the structure of the Early Pleistocene archaeological record in lakeshore environments

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Lakeshore environments offer an excellent opportunity to explore how early humans adapted to changing landscapes and environments. The Nihewan fluvio‐lacustrine sequence in North China contains one of the densest concentrations of Early Pleistocene Palaeolithic sites outside of Africa. Among these, the Cenjiawan site, dated at 1.1 Ma, draws attention due to the large number of stone tool refits. We present here Cenjiawan's sedimentary context, artefact spatial patterns, size distribution and taphonomic features, which are complemented by an experimental programme to better understand archaeological debitage size patterns, thus enabling a detailed analysis of formation processes at the site. The Cenjiawan assemblage is also interpreted in the light of its geographical and geological context, where a synsedimentary fault induced a minor topographic relief across the lacustrine lakeshore. This resulted in a shallow‐water setting in the down‐thrown hanging wall of the fault compartment, and a fluvial environment in the uplifted footwall. Our results indicate that Cenjiawan, situated in the hanging wall of the fault, underwent minimal disturbance, constituting a remarkable example of optimal preservation of archaeological assemblages in Early Pleistocene lakeshore environments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references90

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Archaeological Context and Systemic Context

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Toward the Identification of Formation Processes

            Research in experimental archaeology, ethnoarchaeology, geoarchaeology, and vertebrate taphonomy has appreciably increased our general understanding of the formation processes—cultural and natural—of archaeological sites. In synthesizing some of these recent advances, this paper focuses on the traces of artifacts and characteristics of deposits that can be used to identify the formation processes of specific deposits. These observational phenomena are grouped into three basic categories that structure the presentation: (1) simple properties of artifacts, (2) complex properties of artifacts, and (3) other properties of deposits. Also considered is the way in which prior knowledge can help the archaeologist to cope with the large number of processes and the nearly infinite combination of them that may have contributed to the specific deposits of interest. Several analytical strategies are proposed: (1) hypothesis testing, (2) multivariate analysis, and (3) use of published data to evaluate formation processes. This paper demonstrates that the identification of formation processes, which must precede behavioral inference and be accomplished by any research endeavor that uses evidence from the archaeological record, can become practical and routine.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Conjoinable Pieces and Site Formation Processes

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of Quaternary Science
                J Quaternary Science
                0267-8179
                1099-1417
                May 2023
                December 13 2022
                May 2023
                : 38
                : 4
                : 488-504
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Archaeology, Institute of History CSIC – Spanish National Research Council, Albasanz, 26–28 28037 Madrid Spain
                [2 ]Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100044 China
                [3 ]CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment Beijing 100044 China
                [4 ]Hebei Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics Shijiazhuang 050033 China
                [5 ]Institute of Archaeology University College London 31–34, Gordon Square WC1H 0PY London United Kingdom
                [6 ]School of Humanities University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 China
                Article
                10.1002/jqs.3487
                323300d5-6e4e-4de1-baf4-485feab43128
                © 2023

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article