5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Determination of Passive Dry Powder Inhaler Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution by Multi-Stage Cascade Impactor: International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation & Science (IPAC-RS) Recommendations to Support Both Product Quality Control and Clinical Programs.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The multi-stage cascade impactor (CI) is the mainstay method for the determination of the aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) of aerosols emitted from orally inhaled products (OIPs). CIs are designed to operate at a constant flow rate throughout the measurement process. However, it is necessary to mimic an inhalation maneuver to disperse the powder into an aerosol when testing passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), which constitute a significant portion of available products in this inhaler class. Methods in the pharmacopeial compendia intended for product quality assurance initiate sampling by applying a vacuum to the measurement apparatus using a timer-operated solenoid valve located downstream of the CI, resulting in a period when the flow rate through the impactor rapidly increases from zero towards the target flow rate. This article provides recommendations for achieving consistent APSD measurements, including selection of the CI, pre-separator, and flow control equipment, as well as reviewing considerations that relate to the shape of the flow rate-sampling time profile. Evidence from comparisons of different DPIs delivering the same active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) is indicative that the compendial method for APSD measurement is insensitive as a predictor of pharmacokinetic outcomes. Although inappropriate for product quality testing, guidance is therefore provided towards adopting a more clinically realistic methodology, including the use of an anatomically appropriate inlet and mimicking patient inhalation at the DPI while operating the CI at constant flow rate. Many of these recommendations are applicable to the testing of other OIP classes.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          AAPS PharmSciTech
          AAPS PharmSciTech
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1530-9932
          1530-9932
          May 30 2019
          : 20
          : 5
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Jolyon Mitchell Inhaler Consulting Services Inc, London, ON, Canada.
          [2 ] 3M Drug Delivery Systems, St. Paul, MN, USA.
          [3 ] Independent Consultant, St. Louis, MO, USA.
          [4 ] Biopharmaceutics and Specialty Dosage Forms, Merck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
          [5 ] Research CMC Statistics, Merck & Co., Inc, West Point, PA, USA.
          [6 ] Independent Consultant, Brookfield, CT, USA.
          [7 ] Independent Consultant, New Milford, Connecticut, USA.
          [8 ] Pharmaceutical Practice Group, Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, 1500 K Street, NW, Suite 1100, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005-1209, USA. svetlana.lyapustina@dbr.com.
          Article
          10.1208/s12249-019-1416-x
          10.1208/s12249-019-1416-x
          31147791
          321cca4d-c8ba-48cd-901f-167ca5f140b1
          History

          quality control,dry powder inhaler,clinical support testing,cascade impactor,aerodynamic particle size analysis

          Comments

          Comment on this article