1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Role of vitamins beyond vitamin D 3 in bone health and osteoporosis (Review)

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The objective of the present review was to summarize the molecular mechanisms associated with the effects of the vitamins A, C, E and K, and group B vitamins on bone and their potential roles in the development of osteoporosis. Epidemiological findings have demonstrated an association between vitamin deficiency and a higher risk of developing osteoporosis; vitamins are positively related to bone health upon their intake at the physiological range. Excessive vitamin intake can also adversely affect bone formation, as clearly demonstrated for vitamin A. Vitamins E (tocopherols and tocotrienols), K 2 (menaquinones 4 and 7) and C have also been shown to promote osteoblast development through bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)/Smad and Wnt/β-catenin signaling, as well as the TGFβ/Smad pathway (α-tocopherol). Vitamin A metabolite (all-trans retinoic acid) exerts both inhibitory and stimulatory effects on BMP- and Wnt/β-catenin-mediated osteogenesis at the nanomolar and micromolar range, respectively. Certain vitamins significantly reduce receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) production and RANKL/RANK signaling, while increasing the level of osteoprotegerin (OPG), thus reducing the RANKL/OPG ratio and exerting anti-osteoclastogenic effects. Ascorbic acid can both promote and inhibit RANKL signaling, being essential for osteoclastogenesis. Vitamin K 2 has also been shown to prevent vascular calcification by activating matrix Gla protein through its carboxylation. Therefore, the maintenance of a physiological intake of vitamins should be considered as a nutritional strategy for the prevention of osteoporosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references309

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The epidemiology of osteoporosis.

          With a worldwide ageing population, the importance of the prevention and management of osteoporotic fragility fractures is increasing over time. In this review, we discuss in detail the epidemiology of fragility fractures, how this is shaped by pharmacological interventions and how novel screening programmes can reduce the clinical and economic burden of osteoporotic fractures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The global prevalence of osteoporosis in the world: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

            Background Osteoporosis affects all sections of society, including families with people affected by osteoporosis, government agencies and medical institutes in various fields. For example, it involves the patient and his/her family members, and government agencies in terms of the cost of treatment and medical care. Providing a comprehensive picture of the prevalence of osteoporosis globally is important for health policymakers to make appropriate decisions. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of osteoporosis worldwide. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA criteria. The PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, Magiran, and Google Scholar databases were searched with no lower time limit up till 26 August 2020. The heterogeneity of the studies was measured using the I 2 test, and the publication bias was assessed by the Begg and Mazumdar’s test at the significance level of 0.1. Results After following the systematic review processes, 86 studies were selected for meta-analysis. The sample size of the study was 103,334,579 people in the age range of 15–105 years. Using meta-analysis, the prevalence of osteoporosis in the world was reported to be 18.3 (95% CI 16.2–20.7). Based on 70 studies and sample size of 800,457 women, and heterogenicity I 2 : 99.8, the prevalence of osteoporosis in women of the world was reported to be 23.1 (95% CI 19.8–26.9), while the prevalence of osteoporosis among men of the world was found to be 11.7 (95% CI 9.6–14.1 which was based on 40 studies and sample size of 453,964 men.). The highest prevalence of osteoporosis was reported in Africa with 39.5% (95% CI 22.3–59.7) and a sample size of 2989 people with the age range 18–95 years. Conclusion According to the medical, economic, and social burden of osteoporosis, providing a robust and comprehensive estimate of the prevalence of osteoporosis in the world can facilitate decisions in health system planning and policymaking, including an overview of the current and outlook for the future; provide the necessary facilities for the treatment of people with osteoporosis; reduce the severe risks that lead to death by preventing fractures; and, finally, monitor the overall state of osteoporosis in the world. This study is the first to report a structured review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of osteoporosis worldwide.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A comprehensive overview on osteoporosis and its risk factors

              Osteoporosis is a bone disorder with remarkable changes in bone biologic material and consequent bone structural distraction, affecting millions of people around the world from different ethnic groups. Bone fragility is the worse outcome of the disease, which needs long term therapy and medical management, especially in the elderly. Many involved genes including environmental factors have been introduced as the disease risk factors so far, of which genes should be considered as effective early diagnosis biomarkers, especially for the individuals from high-risk families. In this review, a number of important criteria involved in osteoporosis are addressed and discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Mol Med
                Int J Mol Med
                IJMM
                International Journal of Molecular Medicine
                D.A. Spandidos
                1107-3756
                1791-244X
                January 2024
                05 December 2023
                05 December 2023
                : 53
                : 1
                : 9
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medical Elementology, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow 117198, Russia
                [2 ]Center of Bioelementology and Human Ecology, IM Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119146, Russia
                [3 ]Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
                [4 ]Laboratory of Toxicology and Forensic Sciences, Division of Morphology, Medical School, University of Crete, 70013 Heraklion, Greece
                [5 ]Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, CCNE, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS 97105-900, Brazil
                [6 ]Faculty of Science, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
                [7 ]Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Medical School, University of Crete, 70013 Heraklion, Greece
                [8 ]Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health Laboratory Science, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, P.R. China
                [9 ]Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, P.R. China
                [10 ]College of Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan, R.O.C.
                [11 ]Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215300, P.R. China
                [12 ]Laboratory of Ecobiomonitoring and Quality Control, Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl 150003, Russia
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr Alexey A. Tinkov, Center of Bioelementology and Human Ecology, IM Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 2-4 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya Street, Moscow 119146, Russia, E-mail: tinkov.a.a@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                ijmm-53-01-05333
                10.3892/ijmm.2023.5333
                10712697
                38063255
                318809d9-4196-4767-8ea6-5411b1e85334
                Copyright: © Skalny et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 14 September 2023
                : 15 November 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program
                Award ID: 202713-0-000
                The present study was supported by the RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program (award no. 202713-0-000 'Development of a scientifically based methodology for the ecological adaptation of foreign students to the new environmental conditions').
                Categories
                Review

                vitamins,menaquinone,tocopherol,osteogenesis,osteoporosis
                vitamins, menaquinone, tocopherol, osteogenesis, osteoporosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article