12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Enhancing bone tissue engineering with 3D-Printed polycaprolactone scaffolds integrated with tragacanth gum/bioactive glass

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tissue-engineered bone substitutes, characterized by favorable physicochemical, mechanical, and biological properties, present a promising alternative for addressing bone defects. In this study, we employed an innovative 3D host-guest scaffold model, where the host component served as a mechanical support, while the guest component facilitated osteogenic effects. More specifically, we fabricated a triangular porous polycaprolactone framework (host) using advanced 3D printing techniques, and subsequently filled the framework's pores with tragacanth gum-45S5 bioactive glass as the guest component. Comprehensive assessments were conducted to evaluate the physical, mechanical, and biological properties of the designed scaffolds. Remarkably, successful integration of the guest component within the framework was achieved, resulting in enhanced bioactivity and increased strength. Our findings demonstrated that the scaffolds exhibited ion release (Si, Ca, and P), surface apatite formation, and biodegradation. Additionally, in vitro cell culture assays revealed that the scaffolds demonstrated significant improvements in cell viability, proliferation, and attachment. Significantly, the multi-compartment scaffolds exhibited remarkable osteogenic properties, indicated by a substantial increase in the expression of osteopontin, osteocalcin, and matrix deposition. Based on our results, the framework provided robust mechanical support during the new bone formation process, while the guest component matrix created a conducive micro-environment for cellular adhesion, osteogenic functionality, and matrix production. These multi-compartment scaffolds hold great potential as a viable alternative to autografts and offer promising clinical applications for bone defect repair in the future.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • Polycaprolactone framework as a host component was designed via 3D printing.

          • Tragacanth gum- 45S5 bioactive glass as a guest component was integrated with the framework.

          • The release of ions from the host-guest scaffolds improved the bioactivity response.

          • Guest component enhanced the stiffness of the host component.

          • Host-guest scaffolds induced cell viability, differentiation, and protein expression.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering

          Bone is the second most commonly transplanted tissue worldwide, with over four million operations using bone grafts or bone substitute materials annually to treat bone defects. However, significant limitations affect current treatment options and clinical demand for bone grafts continues to rise due to conditions such as trauma, cancer, infection and arthritis. Developing bioactive three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds to support bone regeneration has therefore become a key area of focus within bone tissue engineering (BTE). A variety of materials and manufacturing methods including 3D printing have been used to create novel alternatives to traditional bone grafts. However, individual groups of materials including polymers, ceramics and hydrogels have been unable to fully replicate the properties of bone when used alone. Favourable material properties can be combined and bioactivity improved when groups of materials are used together in composite 3D scaffolds. This review will therefore consider the ideal properties of bioactive composite 3D scaffolds and examine recent use of polymers, hydrogels, metals, ceramics and bio-glasses in BTE. Scaffold fabrication methodology, mechanical performance, biocompatibility, bioactivity, and potential clinical translations will be discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: A review

            Considering the advantages and disadvantages of biomaterials used for the production of 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering, new strategies for designing advanced functional biomimetic structures have been reviewed. We offer a comprehensive summary of recent trends in development of single- (metal, ceramics and polymers), composite-type and cell-laden scaffolds that in addition to mechanical support, promote simultaneous tissue growth, and deliver different molecules (growth factors, cytokines, bioactive ions, genes, drugs, antibiotics, etc.) or cells with therapeutic or facilitating regeneration effect. The paper briefly focuses on divers 3D bioprinting constructs and the challenges they face. Based on their application in hard and soft tissue engineering, in vitro and in vivo effects triggered by the structural and biological functionalized biomaterials are underlined. The authors discuss the future outlook for the development of bioactive scaffolds that could pave the way for their successful imposing in clinical therapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Porous Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Mater Today Bio
                Mater Today Bio
                Materials Today Bio
                Elsevier
                2590-0064
                20 November 2023
                December 2023
                20 November 2023
                : 23
                : 100872
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
                [b ]Faculty of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
                [c ]Department of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
                [d ]Nervous System Stem Cells Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, 3513138111, Iran
                [e ]Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Semnan University, Semnan, P.O.Box 3513119111, Iran. s_nourbakhsh@ 123456semnan.ac.ir
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author. Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, P.O.Box 3513138111, Iran. m.bahraminasab@ 123456semums.ac.ir
                Article
                S2590-0064(23)00332-0 100872
                10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100872
                10709082
                38075257
                3184325c-4227-4293-a239-e1d2f8a95732
                © 2023 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 28 June 2023
                : 26 October 2023
                : 15 November 2023
                Categories
                Full Length Article

                framework,guest component,multi-compartment scaffold,3d models,bone

                Comments

                Comment on this article