90
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: A systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Pregnancy is a time of increased vulnerability for the development of anxiety and depression. This systematic review aims to identify the main risk factors involved in the onset of antenatal anxiety and depression.

          Methods

          A systematic literature analysis was conducted, using PubMed, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Library. Original papers were included if they were written in English and published between 1st January 2003 and 31st August 2015, while literature reviews and meta-analyses were consulted regardless of publication date. A final number of 97 papers were selected.

          Results

          The most relevant factors associated with antenatal depression or anxiety were: lack of partner or of social support; history of abuse or of domestic violence; personal history of mental illness; unplanned or unwanted pregnancy; adverse events in life and high perceived stress; present/past pregnancy complications; and pregnancy loss.

          Limitations

          The review does not include a meta-analysis, which may have added additional information about the differential impact of each risk factor. Moreover, it does not specifically examine factors that may influence different types of anxiety disorders, or the recurrence or persistence of depression or anxiety from pregnancy to the postpartum period.

          Conclusions

          The results show the complex aetiology of antenatal depression and anxiety. The administration of a screening tool to identify women at risk of anxiety and depression during pregnancy should be universal practice in order to promote the long-term wellbeing of mothers and babies, and the knowledge of specific risk factors may help creating such screening tool targeting women at higher risk.

          Highlights

          • Antenatal depression and anxiety have a multi-factorial aetiology.

          • Six different sources of risk factors have been identified.

          • Lack of support has been identified as the strongest risk factor.

          • Current/past abuse has also been found to be a significant predictor.

          Related collections

          Most cited references128

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Racial Differences in Physical and Mental Health: Socio-economic Status, Stress and Discrimination.

            This article examines the extent to which racial differences in socio-economic status (SES), social class and acute and chronic indicators of perceived discrimination, as well as general measures of stress can account for black-white differences in self-reported measures of physical and mental health. The observed racial differences in health were markedly reduced when adjusted for education and especially income. However, both perceived discrimination and more traditional measures of stress are related to health and play an incremental role in accounting for differences between the races in health status. These findings underscore the need for research efforts to identify the complex ways in which economic and non-economic forms of discrimination relate to each other and combine with socio-economic position and other risk factors and resources to affect health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The link between childhood trauma and depression: insights from HPA axis studies in humans.

              Childhood trauma is a potent risk factor for developing depression in adulthood, particularly in response to additional stress. We here summarize results from a series of clinical studies suggesting that childhood trauma in humans is associated with sensitization of the neuroendocrine stress response, glucocorticoid resistance, increased central corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) activity, immune activation, and reduced hippocampal volume, closely paralleling several of the neuroendocrine features of depression. Neuroendocrine changes secondary to early-life stress likely reflect risk to develop depression in response to stress, potentially due to failure of a connected neural circuitry implicated in emotional, neuroendocrine and autonomic control to compensate in response to challenge. However, not all of depression is related to childhood trauma and our results suggest the existence of biologically distinguishable subtypes of depression as a function of childhood trauma that are also responsive to differential treatment. Other risk factors, such as female gender and genetic dispositions, interfere with components of the stress response and further increase vulnerability for depression. Similar associations apply to a spectrum of other psychiatric and medical disorders that frequently coincide with depression and are aggravated by stress. Taken together, this line of evidence demonstrates that psychoneuroendocrine research may ultimately promote optimized clinical care and help prevent the adverse outcomes of childhood trauma.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Affect Disord
                J Affect Disord
                Journal of Affective Disorders
                Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
                0165-0327
                1573-2517
                1 February 2016
                February 2016
                : 191
                : 62-77
                Affiliations
                [a ]PO63 Section of Perinatal Psychiatry, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
                [b ]Section of Perinatal Psychiatry, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. alessandra.biaggi@ 123456kcl.ac.uk
                Article
                S0165-0327(15)30233-0
                10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.014
                4879174
                26650969
                315e1efa-3c8a-4403-83cb-fe33de1242f1
                © 2015 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 14 May 2015
                : 19 October 2015
                : 11 November 2015
                Categories
                Review Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                antenatal depression,antenatal anxiety,risk factors,antenatal mental health

                Comments

                Comment on this article