There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Given that we have developed for emotional response (Emotional-Gain Model) [1-4] and
a model for fairness (Fairness-Equity Model) [5] that quantified emotional bias and
fairness bias, we will use these models to reveal the hidden factors contributing
to the emotional bias and fairness bias. Using the Ultimatum Game (UG) with human
subjects to split a sum of money, we compare the responses between sharing $10 vs.
$10 million. The results show that the proportionality relationship in fairness perception
is skewed according to the amount of money as well as the relative ratio of equity.
The proportionality relationship in emotional response is also skewed by the amount
of money and the relative ratio of disparity. This quantifies the specific fairness
bias and emotional bias based on the monetary value of the disparity (or equity) between
the shares. The biases are characterized by the shifting of the fairness-curve in
the fairness-equity space, and the shifting of the emotional-curve in the emotional-gain
space graphically. The result also reveals the objectivity of perception in spite
of the subjectivity of their perception to inequitable share.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited.