For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
2
views
46
references
 Top references
cited by
1
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      147
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A modified Delphi study on establishing a curriculum content structure for the leadership and management competency cultivation for future nurse managers in China

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          It is critical to train future nursing managers in advance for the prospective development of healthcare organizations, but a widely recognized curriculum content structure for leadership and management competency development for nurturing future nurse managers was lacking in China.

          Objective

          To establish a curriculum content structure for the leadership and management competency cultivation for future nurse managers in Chinese healthcare setting.

          Methods

          A modified Delphi study was conducted. 22 experts who have in-depth knowledge of nursing leadership and management from 4 main geographical regions in China were included. The initial curriculum content structure was constructed based on a previous qualitative study and two team meetings. Subsequently, a two-round Delphi survey was conducted with 22 panelists in the first round and 19 in the second round. Scores of importance and textual comments were collected and used to judge the achievement of consensus.

          Results

          After the two-round Delphi process, consensus was reached, as each item was rated ≥4 by 84.21–100% of the experts and each one had a coefficient of variance (CV) ≤ 0.174. The finalized curriculum content contains 9 modules and 27 items.

          Conclusions

          This study formed a curriculum content structure for leadership and management competency training for nurses preparing for managerial roles, which contribute to the establishment of a nursing management talent pipeline to meet the needs of healthcare institutions for contemporary nurse managers.

          Abstract

          Nursing leadership; Nursing management; Curriculum content; Future nurse managers; Delphi study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review.

          Lukas Radbruch, Saskia Jünger, Sheila Payne … (2017)
          The Delphi technique is widely used for the development of guidance in palliative care, having impact on decisions with relevance for patient care.
          Article 0 comments Cited 428 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review

            Rym Boulkedid, Hendy Abdoul, Marine Loustau … (2011)
            Objective Delphi technique is a structured process commonly used to developed healthcare quality indicators, but there is a little recommendation for researchers who wish to use it. This study aimed 1) to describe reporting of the Delphi method to develop quality indicators, 2) to discuss specific methodological skills for quality indicators selection 3) to give guidance about this practice. Methodology and Main Finding Three electronic data bases were searched over a 30 years period (1978–2009). All articles that used the Delphi method to select quality indicators were identified. A standardized data extraction form was developed. Four domains (questionnaire preparation, expert panel, progress of the survey and Delphi results) were assessed. Of 80 included studies, quality of reporting varied significantly between items (9% for year's number of experience of the experts to 98% for the type of Delphi used). Reporting of methodological aspects needed to evaluate the reliability of the survey was insufficient: only 39% (31/80) of studies reported response rates for all rounds, 60% (48/80) that feedback was given between rounds, 77% (62/80) the method used to achieve consensus and 57% (48/80) listed quality indicators selected at the end of the survey. A modified Delphi procedure was used in 49/78 (63%) with a physical meeting of the panel members, usually between Delphi rounds. Median number of panel members was 17(Q1:11; Q3:31). In 40/70 (57%) studies, the panel included multiple stakeholders, who were healthcare professionals in 95% (38/40) of cases. Among 75 studies describing criteria to select quality indicators, 28 (37%) used validity and 17(23%) feasibility. Conclusion The use and reporting of the Delphi method for quality indicators selection need to be improved. We provide some guidance to the investigators to improve the using and reporting of the method in future surveys.
            Article 0 comments Cited 400 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.

              Avedis Donabedian (2005)
              Article 0 comments Cited 319 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Yuxia Zhang
                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Heliyon
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Heliyon
                Title: Heliyon
                Publisher: Elsevier
                ISSN (Electronic): 2405-8440
                Publication date PMC-release: 13 December 2022
                Publication date Collection: December 2022
                Publication date (Electronic): 13 December 2022
                Volume: 8
                Issue: 12
                Electronic Location Identifier: e12183
                Affiliations
                [a ]Nursing Department, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, PR China
                [b ]School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, PR China
                Author notes
                [∗ ]Corresponding author. yuxiazhang@ 123456aliyun.com
                Article
                Publisher Item ID: S2405-8440(22)03471-5 Publisher ID: e12183
                DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12183
                PMC ID: 9830176
                PubMed ID: 36636213
                SO-VID: 3106f663-70e5-418b-b837-286236217e53
                Copyright © © 2022 The Author(s)
                License:

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Date received : 9 September 2022
                Date revision received : 20 November 2022
                Date accepted : 30 November 2022
                Categories
                Subject: Research Article

                Keywords: nursing leadership,nursing management,curriculum content,future nurse managers,delphi study
                Data availability:
                Keywords: nursing leadership, nursing management, curriculum content, future nurse managers, delphi study

                Comments

                Comment on this article