45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Personality Factors Predicting Smartphone Addiction Predisposition: Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Systems, Impulsivity, and Self-Control

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this study was to identify personality factor-associated predictors of smartphone addiction predisposition (SAP). Participants were 2,573 men and 2,281 women ( n = 4,854) aged 20–49 years (Mean ± SD: 33.47 ± 7.52); participants completed the following questionnaires: the Korean Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale (K-SAPS) for adults, the Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System questionnaire (BIS/BAS), the Dickman Dysfunctional Impulsivity Instrument (DDII), and the Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS). In addition, participants reported their demographic information and smartphone usage pattern (weekday or weekend average usage hours and main use). We analyzed the data in three steps: (1) identifying predictors with logistic regression, (2) deriving causal relationships between SAP and its predictors using a Bayesian belief network (BN), and (3) computing optimal cut-off points for the identified predictors using the Youden index. Identified predictors of SAP were as follows: gender (female), weekend average usage hours, and scores on BAS-Drive, BAS-Reward Responsiveness, DDII, and BSCS. Female gender and scores on BAS-Drive and BSCS directly increased SAP. BAS-Reward Responsiveness and DDII indirectly increased SAP. We found that SAP was defined with maximal sensitivity as follows: weekend average usage hours > 4.45, BAS-Drive > 10.0, BAS-Reward Responsiveness > 13.8, DDII > 4.5, and BSCS > 37.4. This study raises the possibility that personality factors contribute to SAP. And, we calculated cut-off points for key predictors. These findings may assist clinicians screening for SAP using cut-off points, and further the understanding of SA risk factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Index for rating diagnostic tests.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success.

            What good is self-control? We incorporated a new measure of individual differences in self-control into two large investigations of a broad spectrum of behaviors. The new scale showed good internal consistency and retest reliability. Higher scores on self-control correlated with a higher grade point average, better adjustment (fewer reports of psychopathology, higher self-esteem), less binge eating and alcohol abuse, better relationships and interpersonal skills, secure attachment, and more optimal emotional responses. Tests for curvilinearity failed to indicate any drawbacks of so-called overcontrol, and the positive effects remained after controlling for social desirability. Low self-control is thus a significant risk factor for a broad range of personal and interpersonal problems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Understanding diagnostic tests 3: Receiver operating characteristic curves.

              The results of many clinical tests are quantitative and are provided on a continuous scale. To help decide the presence or absence of disease, a cut-off point for 'normal' or 'abnormal' is chosen. The sensitivity and specificity of a test vary according to the level that is chosen as the cut-off point. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, a graphical technique for describing and comparing the accuracy of diagnostic tests, is obtained by plotting the sensitivity of a test on the y axis against 1-specificity on the x axis. Two methods commonly used to establish the optimal cut-off point include the point on the ROC curve closest to (0, 1) and the Youden index. The area under the ROC curve provides a measure of the overall performance of a diagnostic test. In this paper, the author explains how the ROC curve can be used to select optimal cut-off points for a test result, to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a test, and to compare the usefulness of tests. The ROC curve is obtained by calculating the sensitivity and specificity of a test at every possible cut-off point, and plotting sensitivity against 1-specificity. The curve may be used to select optimal cut-off values for a test result, to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a test, and to compare the usefulness of different tests.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                17 August 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 8
                : e0159788
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Creative IT Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [3 ]Department of Medical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                Universidad de Granada, SPAIN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceived and designed the experiments: YK JJ MR HY DK IC.

                • Performed the experiments: HC DJ MK.

                • Analyzed the data: YK JJ.

                • Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: YK JJ.

                • Wrote the paper: YK JJ MR HY DK IC.

                ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-35202
                10.1371/journal.pone.0159788
                4988723
                27533112
                30dabcbb-013a-4b99-a9ae-05456856b756
                © 2016 Kim et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 27 August 2015
                : 8 July 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 6, Pages: 15
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003725, National Research Foundation of Korea;
                Award ID: NRF 2014M3C7A1062893
                This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2014M3C7A1062893). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Engineering and Technology
                Equipment
                Communication Equipment
                Cell Phones
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Addiction
                Behavioral Addiction
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Addiction
                Behavioral Addiction
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Addiction
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Addiction
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Personality
                Personality Traits
                Impulsivity
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Personality
                Personality Traits
                Impulsivity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Personality
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Personality
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Personality
                Personality Traits
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Personality
                Personality Traits
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Addiction
                Computer Addiction
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Addiction
                Computer Addiction
                Custom metadata
                Survey material is confidential because it may include un-anonymized personal information, but minimal data set can be made available upon request. Contact information: Bohyun Jang, Hankook Research Inc. bhjang@ 123456hrc.co.kr

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article