1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A transdisciplinary approach to define and assess wild food plant sustainable foraging in Norway

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Societal Impact Statement

          Foraging wild food plants is sometimes perceived as a conservation threat or, alternatively, as an opportunity for sustainable development. Little is known of how foragers themselves define and ensure sustainable foraging. Here, we collaboratively assessed the activities and motivations of the forager community in Norway in order to achieve a combined social and ecological assessment of foraging sustainability. Current foraging of wild food plants in Norway contributes to an increased appreciation of nature rather than generating negative environmental impact and is hence an opportunity for sustainable development.

          Summary

          • Wild food plants are well recognized as local sources of nutrition that can contribute to food security, but foraging is sometimes viewed as a threat to biological conservation. Here, we characterize and assess sustainable foraging in Norway through transdisciplinary research co‐constructed with the Norwegian Association for Mycology and Foraging.

          • We conducted 19 face‐to‐face interviews with key stakeholders and produced an online questionnaire returned by 219 recreational and commercial foragers to enquire about what species are harvested, by whom and how, where do foragers learn and what are their perspectives on the sustainability of foraging.

          • Foraging fosters a strong connection with the natural environment. Foragers decide when and how much can be harvested considering location, plant and plant part being harvested. They pay attention to native plants' conservation status and local abundance and plant individual's survival after foraging and aim to not spread invasive species.

          • We define sustainable foraging as the knowledge and practices that enable enriching forager–biodiversity relationships over time. Such a definition can support collaborative sustainability efforts between the academic community and civil society.

          Abstract

          Sanking av ville matplanter kan bli oppfattet enten som en trussel mot miljøet eller som en innfallsport til bærekraftig utvikling. Vi vet lite om hvordan sankerne selv definerer sankingen eller sikrer at sankingen deres er bærekraftig. Derfor har vi i et samarbeid undersøkt aktivitetene og motivasjonen i det norske sankermiljøet for å forstå deres samfunnsmessige og økologiske tilnærming til hva som er bærekraftig sanking. Heller enn å innebære en negativ påvirkning av natur og miljø bidrar dagens sanking av ville matplanter i Norge til økt forståelse av naturens verdi og representerer en mulighet for bærekraftig utvikling.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach

            Indigenous and local knowledge systems as well as practitioners’ knowledge can provide valid and useful knowledge to enhance our understanding of governance of biodiversity and ecosystems for human well-being. There is, therefore, a great need within emerging global assessment programs, such as the IPBES and other international efforts, to develop functioning mechanisms for legitimate, transparent, and constructive ways of creating synergies across knowledge systems. We present the multiple evidence base (MEB) as an approach that proposes parallels whereby indigenous, local and scientific knowledge systems are viewed to generate different manifestations of knowledge, which can generate new insights and innovations through complementarities. MEB emphasizes that evaluation of knowledge occurs primarily within rather than across knowledge systems. MEB on a particular issue creates an enriched picture of understanding, for triangulation and joint assessment of knowledge, and a starting point for further knowledge generation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              LINGUISTIC, CULTURAL, AND BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
                Plants People Planet
                Wiley
                2572-2611
                2572-2611
                January 2023
                September 20 2022
                January 2023
                : 5
                : 1
                : 112-122
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Natural History Museum University of Oslo Oslo Norway
                [2 ] Norges sopp‐ og nyttevekstforbund (NSNF) Oslo Norway
                [3 ] UMR LISST‐Dynamiques Rurales, INP‐PURPAN Toulouse France
                Article
                10.1002/ppp3.10332
                30a4e27c-12c7-45a3-89f9-13a733cc2b0d
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article