14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Oxidative stress induces dysregulated autophagy in corneal epithelium of keratoconus patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Oxidative stress is one of the key factors that contributes to the pathogenesis of keratoconus (KC). Macroautophagy is a vital cellular mechanism that is activated in response to oxidative stress. The aim of this study was to understand the role of the autophagic lysosomal pathway in the oxidative damage of KC corneal epithelium and the human corneal epithelial cell line (HCE).The corneal epithelium was collected from 78 KC patients undergoing corneal cross-linking or topography guided photorefractive keratectomy. We performed microarray, qPCR and western blot analysis for the expression of autophagy markers on this epithelium from patients with different clinical grades of KC. A differential expression pattern of autophagy related markers was observed in the diseased corneal cone-specific epithelium compared to matched peripheral epithelium from KC patients with increasing clinical severity. Human corneal epithelial cells exposed to oxidative stress were analyzed for the expression of key proteins associated with KC pathogenesis and the autophagic pathway. Oxidative stress led to an increase in reactive oxygen species and an imbalanced expression of autophagy markers in the HCE cells. Further, reduced levels of Akt/p70S6 Kinase, which is a known target of the mTOR pathway was observed in HCE cells under oxidative stress as well as in KC epithelium. Our results suggest that an altered expression of proteins suggestive of defective autophagy and is a consequence of oxidative damage. This could play a possible role in the pathogenesis of KC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy.

          In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            How to interpret LC3 immunoblotting.

            Microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3) is now widely used to monitor autophagy. One approach is to detect LC3 conversion (LC3-I to LC3-II) by immunoblot analysis because the amount of LC3-II is clearly correlated with the number of autophagosomes. However, LC3-II itself is degraded by autophagy, making interpretation of the results of LC3 immunoblotting problematic. Furthermore, the amount of LC3 at a certain time point does not indicate autophagic flux, and therefore, it is important to measure the amount of LC3-II delivered to lysosomes by comparing LC3-II levels in the presence and absence of lysosomal protease inhibitors. Another problem with this method is that LC3-II tends to be much more sensitive to be detected by immunoblotting than LC3-I. Accordingly, simple comparison of LC3-I and LC3-II, or summation of LC3-I and LC3-II for ratio determinations, may not be appropriate, and rather, the amount of LC3-II can be compared between samples.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A unified nomenclature for yeast autophagy-related genes.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data curationRole: ResourcesRole: Validation
                Role: Data curationRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: Validation
                Role: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Resources
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Resources
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: Visualization
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Resources
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                13 September 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 9
                : e0184628
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Cornea and Refractive surgery, Narayana Nethralaya Eye Hospital, Narayana Health City, Bommasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
                [2 ] GROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
                [3 ] Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
                Univerzitet u Beogradu, SERBIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7380-8762
                Article
                PONE-D-17-21919
                10.1371/journal.pone.0184628
                5597215
                28902914
                303a6e77-a9bd-4a32-826f-a2524658f003
                © 2017 Shetty et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 8 June 2017
                : 28 August 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 2, Pages: 20
                Funding
                Funded by: Department of science and technology, India
                Award ID: SB/YS/LS-68/2013
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS)
                Award ID: (37(1)/14/11/2016)
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Narayana Nethralaya Foundation
                This study was supported by Department of Science and Technology (DST)-SERB (SB/YS/LS-68/2013), New Delhi, India; Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS), (37(1)/14/11/2016) Mumbai, India; Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Ocular Anatomy
                Cornea
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Ocular Anatomy
                Cornea
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cell Processes
                Cell Death
                Autophagic Cell Death
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Oxidative Stress
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Biological Tissue
                Epithelium
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Biological Tissue
                Epithelium
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Structures and Organelles
                Lysosomes
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Oxidative Damage
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmacology
                Drugs
                Antimalarials
                Chloroquine
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Ocular Anatomy
                Corneal Epithelium
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Ocular Anatomy
                Corneal Epithelium
                Custom metadata
                Micro array data set submitted to Gene Expression Omnibus GEO (accession number GSE92935).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article