6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Access to publicly funded outpatient physiotherapy services in Quebec: waiting lists and management strategies

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            How to Estimate and Interpret Various Effect Sizes.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Implications of early and guideline adherent physical therapy for low back pain on utilization and costs

              Background Initial management decisions following a new episode of low back pain (LBP) are thought to have profound implications for health care utilization and costs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of early and guideline adherent physical therapy for low back pain on utilization and costs within the Military Health System (MHS). Methods Patients presenting to a primary care setting with a new complaint of LBP from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2009 were identified from the MHS Management Analysis and Reporting Tool. Descriptive statistics, utilization, and costs were examined on the basis of timing of referral to physical therapy and adherence to practice guidelines over a 2-year period. Utilization outcomes (advanced imaging, lumbar injections or surgery, and opioid use) were compared using adjusted odds ratios with 99% confidence intervals. Total LBP-related health care costs over the 2-year follow-up were compared using linear regression models. Results 753,450 eligible patients with a primary care visit for LBP between 18–60 years of age were considered. Physical therapy was utilized by 16.3% (n = 122,723) of patients, with 24.0% (n = 17,175) of those receiving early physical therapy that was adherent to recommendations for active treatment. Early referral to guideline adherent physical therapy was associated with significantly lower utilization for all outcomes and 60% lower total LBP-related costs. Conclusions The potential for cost savings in the MHS from early guideline adherent physical therapy may be substantial. These results also extend the findings from similar studies in civilian settings by demonstrating an association between early guideline adherent care and utilization and costs in a single payer health system. Future research is necessary to examine which patients with LBP benefit early physical therapy and determine strategies for providing early guideline adherent care. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0830-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Disability and Rehabilitation
                Disability and Rehabilitation
                Informa UK Limited
                0963-8288
                1464-5165
                September 05 2017
                December 18 2017
                October 19 2016
                December 18 2017
                : 39
                : 26
                : 2648-2656
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada;
                [2 ] Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada;
                [3 ] School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;
                [4 ] Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada;
                [5 ] Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;
                [6 ] Direction of Public Health of the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Est-de-l’ḽle-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                Article
                10.1080/09638288.2016.1238967
                27758150
                300af05a-dc12-4683-ab84-271f1c1209f3
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article