7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Birth plan alterations among American women in response to COVID‐19

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the editor: The COVID‐19 pandemic has drastically strained the American healthcare system. 1 Crowded hospitals, overworked staff and a lack of medical equipment have implications for those needing medical care unrelated to COVID‐19, including pregnant women. However, few studies have examined the impact of the pandemic on maternity care. What little work has been done has predominantly focused on treatment of pregnant women suffering from COVID‐19 2 , 3 and the risk of virus transmission from mother to baby. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 It remains unclear how the pandemic has influenced maternal care choices, in particular how women have altered their birth plans. Data on common birth plan changes are needed to help providers better understand factors shaping care decisions, information that can be used to address patient concerns and tailor care recommendations. Here, we use an online convenience survey to assess how American women's birth plans (eg intended labour support and delivery location) have changed in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic. The COVID‐19 And Reproductive Effects (CARE) study was posted on social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter) and distributed via email to contacts working in maternity care and public health. Pregnant women over the age of 18 and living in the United States were invited to participate in a survey assessing how the pandemic was impacting their medical care and birth plans. The data presented here were collected between 16 and 20 April 2020. In addition to providing basic demographic data, gestational week and intended delivery facility, participants were asked whether ‘any aspect of your birth plan changed due to COVID‐19’ (yes/no). If they answered yes, they were then asked why and how their plans changed. These analyses were limited to participants who completed the entire survey (n = 1400). A subset of this sample also answered an open‐ended question describing the specific changes to their birth plans (n = 592); these qualitative responses were assessed for common patterns. 7 This study received ethical approval from Dartmouth College (STUDY00032045). The average participant age was 31.4 years old. The majority of participants were married/in domestic partnerships (94.5%), White (85.9%), had completed at least a bachelor's degree (77.3%), were employed full‐time (61.1%) and reported having not experienced any COVID‐19‐like symptoms (89.4%). Most participants planned on giving birth in a hospital (94.8% in hospital, 2.9% in free‐standing birth centres, 2.3% at home). Overall, 45.2% of respondents reported changing some aspect of their birth plans because of COVID‐19, due in part to their own concerns (53.9% of respondents), their partner's concerns (21.9%), the concerns of friends or family members (13.8%) and comments from medical providers (60.8%). The prevalence of women changing their birth plans varied by trimester. Approximately 28.6% of women in their first trimester (36/126) reported changing their plans due to COVID‐19, compared to 37.0% of women in their second trimester (228/617 women) and 56.2% of women in their third trimester (369/657 women). Commonly provided COVID‐related birth plan changes—from a subset of 592 respondents—are outlined in Table 1. These changes largely fell into three categories: (i) modifying an existing hospital birth plan (ie shortening the hospital stay, altered pain management strategies and accommodating new policies like wearing a mask while labouring); (ii) changing birth locations and/or providers (ie opting for an out of hospital birth, forced provider/location change because pandemic has limited availability, selecting hospital birth because of fear complications); and (iii) other COVID‐related concerns (ie having fewer support people at birth, visitors not permitted following birth, care disrupted because moved in response to shelter‐in‐place orders). Table 1 Commonly reported reasons for birth plan changes (eg changes in birth location, labour and delivery preferences) provided by a subset of the sample (n = 592) Remaining at same hospital with altered birth plan Changing birth locations due to the pandemic Other COVID‐related concerns Planning to shorten my hospital stay and reduce risk of exposure by scheduling a C‐section, planning an induction, labouring at home as long as possible before transferring to hospital to deliver, and/or reducing post‐delivery recovery time (n = 62) No longer plan for hospital birth because I worry about being separated from my newborn, having to labour alone, and/or I fear COVID‐19 exposure (n = 81) Will have fewer people present to support me during delivery (and they will not be allowed to leave and return) because of delivery room restrictions and/or I fear that they have been exposed to the virus (n = 367) Will have to accommodate new hospital protective policies during delivery (eg masks on labouring mothers and restricted movement during labour) (n = 46) The pandemic has restricted provider availability and/or deliveries at local birth centres no longer allowed (n = 25) Loved ones can no longer travel to visit after the birth and/or my partner may have to care for our other children and not be able to support me in labour (n = 186) Altered pain management strategy (eg nitrous oxide no longer offered, worried to get epidural because of exposure risk, or can no longer have a water birth) (n = 42) Now prefer hospital birth over home birth in case things go wrong: do not want to suffer complications because unknowingly have virus or have trouble getting admitted because hospital at capacity (n = 8) Left COVID‐19 epicentre and/or temporarily moved in with family to shelter‐in‐place and now have to find a new provider (n = 8) Note The number of responses for each COVID‐related reason is noted, respondents sometimes listed more than one factor impacting their birth decisions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency. Many participants planned to remain with their current provider, but were preparing for a very different birth experience with fewer support persons during labour (n = 367/592) and no visitors to meet their baby or care for their other children during delivery (n = 186/592). Some women worried they might have to labour alone if childcare could not be arranged and their partner had to watch their other children instead of attending the birth. Several women reported opting to no longer give birth in a hospital due to restrictions on who would be allowed in the delivery room, the possibility of forced separation from their newborn and fear of virus exposure (n = 81/592). Pregnant American women face a variety of care‐related challenges related to COVID‐19, and our results demonstrate that this has led to altered birth plans. Yet, the reasons behind the changes appear to be individual‐dependent. While several participants reported that they now preferred an out of hospital birth because they feared COVID‐19 exposure, a handful of women reported choosing a hospital instead of a home birth because they feared suffering COVID‐related complications during delivery if they were unknowing carriers, or because they worried they would not be admitted to an overcrowded hospital should they need to transfer. Notably, the women in this sample exhibited a much higher preference for out of hospital births than the national average before the COVID‐19 pandemic (5.4% vs. 1.6%, respectively). 8 While this may be due in part to the demographic characteristics of the sample, this percentage is also comparatively high among women in the sample who had previously given birth. Specifically, of the 667 women in the sample who had previously given birth, 3.1% reported an out of hospital delivery for at least one of their previous births, but 5.1% of these same women now reported they planned for an out of hospital delivery. This, combined with the qualitative data reported here, suggests that part of this increase in out of hospital births is likely attributable to the COVID‐19 pandemic. It is important to note that due to the use of convenience sampling these data are not representative of the whole US population. Additional work is needed using more diverse samples to identify additional issues influencing maternal care decisions. The diverse factors influencing maternal birth plan choices highlighted here may serve as reference providers can use to explore the specific concerns of each patient, ultimately leading to more productive provider‐patient conversations about the maternal care and delivery options available to best address any given situation. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Pregnancy: What obstetricians need to know

            Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging disease with a rapid increase in cases and deaths since its first identification in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Limited data are available about COVID-19 during pregnancy; however, information on illnesses associated with other highly pathogenic coronaviruses (i.e., severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)) might provide insights into COVID-19’s effects during pregnancy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An Analysis of 38 Pregnant Women with COVID-19, Their Newborn Infants, and Maternal-Fetal Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: Maternal Coronavirus Infections and Pregnancy Outcomes

              The emergence of a novel coronavirus, termed SARS-CoV-2, and the potentially life-threating respiratory disease that it can produce, COVID-19, has rapidly spread across the globe creating a massive public health problem. Previous epidemics of many emerging viral infections have typically resulted in poor obstetrical outcomes including maternal morbidity and mortality, maternal-fetal transmission of the virus, and perinatal infections and death. This communication reviews the effects of two previous coronavirus infections - severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) caused by MERS-CoV - on pregnancy outcomes. In addition, it analyzes literature describing 38 pregnant women with COVID-19 and their newborns in China to assess the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on the mothers and infants including clinical, laboratory and virologic data, and the transmissibility of the virus from mother to fetus. This analysis reveals that unlike coronavirus infections of pregnant women caused by SARS and MERS, in these 38 pregnant women COVID-19 did not lead to maternal deaths. Importantly, and similar to pregnancies with SARS and MERS, there were no confirmed cases of intrauterine transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from mothers with COVID-19 to their fetuses. All neonatal specimens tested, including in some cases placentas, were negative by rt-PCR for SARS-CoV-2. At this point in the global pandemic of COVID-19 infection there is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 undergoes intrauterine or transplacental transmission from infected pregnant women to their fetuses. Analysis of additional cases is necessary to determine if this remains true.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: McKennan Postdoctoral FellowTheresa.E.Gildner@dartmouth.edu
                Role: Assistant Professor
                Journal
                Health Expect
                Health Expect
                10.1111/(ISSN)1369-7625
                HEX
                Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1369-6513
                1369-7625
                24 May 2020
                : 10.1111/hex.13077
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Anthropology Dartmouth College Hanover NH USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Theresa E. Gildner, Department of Anthropology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.

                Email: Theresa.E.Gildner@ 123456dartmouth.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7486-5208
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8028-942X
                Article
                HEX13077
                10.1111/hex.13077
                7283869
                32449262
                2fed5228-2693-49e8-a7ad-998620a5c2f9
                © 2020 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 April 2020
                : 03 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Pages: 3, Words: 2988
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor
                Letters to the Editor
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.4 mode:remove_FC converted:10.06.2020

                Health & Social care
                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article