El artículo confronta la concepción de discriminación contenida en la ley 20.609 con la que se expresa en el Derecho internacional de los derechos humanos y en el Derecho constitucional chileno. En particular se contrastan tres elementos constitutivos de aquella concepción: el concepto de discriminación, la función de las categorías sospechosas en la identificación de una conducta discriminatoria y la solución de las colisiones entre la no discriminación y otros derechos fundamentales o bienes jurídicos constitucionales. Este contraste permite formarse una opinión negativa respecto de la utilidad de la acción procesal incluida en aquella ley.
The paper confronts the way discrimination is understood in law number 20.609 with the way it is understood in Human Rights International Law and in the Chilean Constitutional Law. Particularly, three constitutive elements of this understanding are compared: the concept of discrimination, the role that suspicious categories have in identifying a discriminatory conduct and the solutions given to the collision among non-discrimination and other fundamental rights or constitutional protected legal rights. This confrontation allows to form a negative opinion about the usefulness of the court action included in the mentioned law.
See how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.