13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk factors for suboptimal glycemic control in pediatrics with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The objective of this research is to analyze the influence of various factors on glycemic control in pediatrics with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The study, a cross-sectional analysis, involved 221 T1DM patients below 18 years old who visited our clinic between 2011 and 2020, predating the COVID-19 outbreak. Out of the initial pool, 204 participants were chosen based on specific criteria. By computing odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, we determined the correlation between these factors and achieving optimal glycemic control (HbA1c < 7.5%). Of the 204 individuals, 55.9% (113 patients) were female. The average age at diagnosis was 6.93 ± 3.9 years. Mean HbA1c (A1C) level of optimal and suboptimal groups were 6.97, 95% CI 6.84 to 7.1 and 8.86, 95% CI 8.68 to 9.03, respectively (p-value < 0.001). Fifty patients had optimal glycemic control and 154 people experienced suboptimal glycemic control during the follow-up that the prevalence of each of them was 24.51, 95% CI 18.7 to 31 and 75.49, 95% CI 68.99 to 81.22, respectively. In the assessment of risk factors associated with suboptimal glycemic control, patients aged 10–14 years had the highest likelihood of experiencing suboptimal glycemic control (crude odds ratio [COR] 3.12, 95% CI 1.04 to 9.3), followed by duration of diabetes (COR 2.85, 95% CI 1.2 to 6.8), which both were significant. By utilizing multivariable logistic regression analysis, a noteworthy finding emerged. It was revealed that patients aged 10–14 years exhibited a significant association with suboptimal glycemic control, [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.85, 95% CI 1.32 to 17.7]. Additionally, a statistically significant correlation was identified between individuals with a body mass index (BMI) falling within the ≥ 95th percentile category and suboptimal glycemic control, Cramer’s V = 0.21, p-value = 0.01. Our research has revealed a significant correlation between patients aged 10–14 years and obese individuals (BMI ≥ 95th) with suboptimal glycemic control. It is crucial to consider these factors as they can offer valuable insights during diagnosis, highlighting the increased risk of long-term suboptimal glycemic control.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry.

          To examine the overall state of metabolic control and current use of advanced diabetes technologies in the U.S., we report recent data collected on individuals with type 1 diabetes participating in the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Data from 16,061 participants updated between 1 September 2013 and 1 December 2014 were compared with registry enrollment data collected from 1 September 2010 to 1 August 2012. Mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was assessed by year of age from 75 years. The overall average HbA1c was 8.2% (66 mmol/mol) at enrollment and 8.4% (68 mmol/mol) at the most recent update. During childhood, mean HbA1c decreased from 8.3% (67 mmol/mol) in 2-4-year-olds to 8.1% (65 mmol/mol) at 7 years of age, followed by an increase to 9.2% (77 mmol/mol) in 19-year-olds. Subsequently, mean HbA1c values decline gradually until ∼30 years of age, plateauing at 7.5-7.8% (58-62 mmol/mol) beyond age 30 until a modest drop in HbA1c below 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) in those 65 years of age. Severe hypoglycemia (SH) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) remain all too common complications of treatment, especially in older (SH) and younger patients (DKA). Insulin pump use increased slightly from enrollment (58-62%), and use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) did not change (7%). Although the T1D Exchange registry findings are not population based and could be biased, it is clear that there remains considerable room for improving outcomes of treatment of type 1 diabetes across all age-groups. Barriers to more effective use of current treatments need to be addressed and new therapies are needed to achieve optimal metabolic control in people with type 1 diabetes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes.

            This article describes the epidemiology of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) around the world and across the lifespan. Epidemiologic patterns of T1D by demographic, geographic, biologic, cultural, and other factors in populations are presented to gain insight about the causes, natural history, risks, and complications of T1D. Data from large epidemiologic studies worldwide indicate that the incidence of T1D has been increasing by 2% to 5% worldwide and that the prevalence of T1D is approximately 1 in 300 in the United States by 18 years of age. Research on risk factors for T1D is an active area of research to identify genetic and environmental triggers that could potentially be targeted for intervention. Although significant advances have been made in the clinical care of T1D with resultant improvements in quality of life and clinical outcomes, much more needs to be done to improve care of, and ultimately find a cure for, T1D. Epidemiologic studies have an important ongoing role to investigate the complex causes, clinical care, prevention, and cure of T1D. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              11. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2019

              (2018)
              The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                danielzamanfar@yahoo.com , daniel.zamanfar2024@gmail.com
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                29 March 2024
                29 March 2024
                2024
                : 14
                : 7492
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, ( https://ror.org/02wkcrp04) Sari, Iran
                [2 ]Gut and Liver Research Center, Non-Communicable Disease Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, ( https://ror.org/02wkcrp04) Sari, Iran
                [3 ]Gastrointestinal Research Center, Non-Communicable Disease Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, ( https://ror.org/02wkcrp04) Sari, Iran
                [4 ]Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes Research Center of Mazandaran, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, ( https://ror.org/02wkcrp04) Sari, Iran
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9240-494X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7788-5471
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1005-0557
                http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4293-9812
                Article
                57205
                10.1038/s41598-024-57205-9
                10980686
                38553464
                2f6c0f0f-5f4b-40ae-b6ba-da96c64c3cd0
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 22 December 2023
                : 15 March 2024
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2024

                Uncategorized
                type 1 diabetes,pediatric,glycemic control,hemoglobin a1c,endocrinology,risk factors
                Uncategorized
                type 1 diabetes, pediatric, glycemic control, hemoglobin a1c, endocrinology, risk factors

                Comments

                Comment on this article