11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing

      ,
      Journal of Biomechanics
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A new quantitative tissue differentiation theory which relates the local tissue formation in a fracture gap to the local stress and strain is presented. Our hypothesis proposes that the amounts of strain and hydrostatic pressure along existing calcified surfaces in the fracture callus determine the differentiation of the callus tissue. The study compares the local strains and stresses in the callus as calculated from a finite element model with histological findings from an animal fracture model. The hypothesis predicts intramembranous bone formation for strains smaller approximately +/- 5% and hydrostatic pressures smaller than +/- 0.15 MPa. Endochondral ossification is associated with compressive pressures larger than about -0.15 MPa and strains smaller than +/- 15%. All other conditions seemed to lead to connective tissue or fibrous cartilage. The hypothesis enables a better understanding of the complex tissue differentiation seen in histological images and the mechanical conditions for healing delayed healing or nonunions.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Biomechanics
          Journal of Biomechanics
          Elsevier BV
          00219290
          March 1999
          March 1999
          : 32
          : 3
          : 255-266
          Article
          10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00153-5
          10093025
          2ede358a-e45c-4d2a-9b3f-0d904f31f489
          © 1999

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article