22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Epidemiology and Health Impacts of Neuroendocrine Tumors

      Submit here before August 30, 2024

      About Neuroendocrinology: 3.2 Impact Factor I 8.3 CiteScore I 1.009 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Comparison of Apgar Scores and Changes in the Neonates of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Patients Treated with Metformin versus Glyburide: A Systematic Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims: This study aims to compare the Apgar scores (at different time points after birth) and their changes between the newborns of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients treated with metformin and glyburide, respectively. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared these outcomes between the above-depicted intervention groups. The data about the study design, the population characteristics, the interventions compared, and the outcomes of interest were extracted from the eligible trials. Then, these trials were critically appraised by the Cochrane tool. After that, the effect of the tested interventions on the respective outcomes of interest was reported narratively. Results: The literature search produced 4 single-center trials sourcing data from about 538 participants in the USA, Brazil, and Israel. The risk of detection and performance bias was unclear in the respective trials. The trials primarily reported about the Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min after birth. These scores were not different between glyburide- and metformin-treated GDM patients in any trial. No trial reported the Apgar score at 10 min after birth or the changes in Apgar score between 1, 5, or 10 min after birth. Conclusion: In all trials, the Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min after birth did not vary between the newborns of GDM mothers treated with metformin and glyburide, respectively.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

          David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190

            (2018)
            Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common medical complications of pregnancy. However, debate continues to surround the diagnosis and treatment of GDM despite several recent large-scale studies addressing these issues. The purposes of this document are the following: 1) provide a brief overview of the understanding of GDM, 2) review management guidelines that have been validated by appropriately conducted clinical research, and 3) identify gaps in current knowledge toward which future research can be directed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Neonatal, infant, and childhood growth following metformin versus insulin treatment for gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

              Background Metformin is increasingly offered as an acceptable and economic alternative to insulin for treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in many countries. However, the impact of maternal metformin treatment on the trajectory of fetal, infant, and childhood growth is unknown. Methods and findings PubMed, Ovid Embase, Medline, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane database were systematically searched (from database inception to 26 February 2019). Outcomes of GDM-affected pregnancies randomised to treatment with metformin versus insulin were included (randomised controlled trials and prospective randomised controlled studies) from cohorts including European, American, Asian, Australian, and African women. Studies including pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes or non-diabetic women were excluded, as were trials comparing metformin treatment with oral glucose-lowering agents other than insulin. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for eligibility and risk of bias, and conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer. Outcome measures were parameters of fetal, infant, and childhood growth, including weight, height, BMI, and body composition. In total, 28 studies (n = 3,976 participants) met eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. No studies reported fetal growth parameters; 19 studies (n = 3,723 neonates) reported measures of neonatal growth. Neonates born to metformin-treated mothers had lower birth weights (mean difference −107.7 g, 95% CI −182.3 to −32.7, I 2 = 83%, p = 0.005) and lower ponderal indices (mean difference −0.13 kg/m3, 95% CI −0.26 to 0.00, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.04) than neonates of insulin-treated mothers. The odds of macrosomia (odds ratio [OR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.77, p < 0.001) and large for gestational age (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.99, p = 0.04) were lower following maternal treatment with metformin compared to insulin. There was no difference in neonatal height or incidence of small for gestational age between groups. Two studies (n = 411 infants) reported measures of infant growth (18–24 months of age). In contrast to the neonatal phase, metformin-exposed infants were significantly heavier than those in the insulin-exposed group (mean difference 440 g, 95% CI 50 to 830, I 2 = 4%, p = 0.03). Three studies (n = 520 children) reported mid-childhood growth parameters (5–9 years). In mid-childhood, BMI was significantly higher (mean difference 0.78 kg/m2, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.33, I 2 = 7%, p = 0.005) following metformin exposure than following insulin exposure, although the difference in absolute weights between the groups was not significantly different (p = 0.09). Limited evidence (1 study with data treated as 2 cohorts) suggested that adiposity indices (abdominal [p = 0.02] and visceral [p = 0.03] fat volumes) may be higher in children born to metformin-treated compared to insulin-treated mothers. Study limitations include heterogeneity in metformin dosing, heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria for GDM, and the scarcity of reporting of childhood outcomes. Conclusions Following intrauterine exposure to metformin for treatment of maternal GDM, neonates are significantly smaller than neonates whose mothers were treated with insulin during pregnancy. Despite lower average birth weight, metformin-exposed children appear to experience accelerated postnatal growth, resulting in heavier infants and higher BMI by mid-childhood compared to children whose mothers were treated with insulin. Such patterns of low birth weight and postnatal catch-up growth have been reported to be associated with adverse long-term cardio-metabolic outcomes. This suggests a need for further studies examining longitudinal perinatal and childhood outcomes following intrauterine metformin exposure. This review protocol was registered with PROSPERO under registration number CRD42018117503.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                DDE
                10.1159/issn.2673-1738
                International Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism
                S. Karger AG
                2673-1797
                2673-1738
                2020
                December 2020
                05 May 2020
                : 26
                : 1
                : 21-26
                Affiliations
                [_a] aNational Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India
                [_b] bMankar College, Mankar, India
                Author notes
                *Dr. Sumanta Saha, A-10/323, Kalyani, West Bengal 741235 (India), sumanta.saha@uq.net.au
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-8846
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2009-6786
                Article
                507244 Dubai Diabetes Endocrinol J 2020;26:21–26
                10.1159/000507244
                2e65d210-d3f5-4b9e-9e1b-3044e2610dd8
                © 2020 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

                This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 17 December 2019
                : 15 March 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Review Article

                Endocrinology & Diabetes,Neurology,Nutrition & Dietetics,Sexual medicine,Internal medicine,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Gestational diabetes mellitus,Metformin,Glyburide,Apgar score,Infant,Newborn

                Comments

                Comment on this article