1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Methodological and practical guidance for designing and conducting online qualitative surveys in public health

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Online qualitative surveys—those surveys that prioritise qualitative questions and interpretivist values—have rich potential for researchers, particularly in new or emerging areas of public health. However, there is limited discussion about the practical development and methodological implications of such surveys, particularly for public health researchers. This poses challenges for researchers, funders, ethics committees, and peer reviewers in assessing the rigour and robustness of such research, and in deciding the appropriateness of the method for answering different research questions. Drawing and extending on the work of other researchers, as well as our own experiences of conducting online qualitative surveys with young people and adults, we describe the processes associated with developing and implementing online qualitative surveys and writing up online qualitative survey data. We provide practical examples and lessons learned about question development, the importance of rigorous piloting strategies, use of novel techniques to prompt detailed responses from participants, and decisions that are made about data preparation and interpretation. We consider reviewer comments, and some ethical considerations of this type of qualitative research for both participants and researchers. We provide a range of practical strategies to improve trustworthiness in decision-making and data interpretation—including the importance of using theory. Rigorous online qualitative surveys that are grounded in qualitative interpretivist values offer a range of unique benefits for public health researchers, knowledge users, and research participants.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power

          Sample sizes must be ascertained in qualitative studies like in quantitative studies but not by the same means. The prevailing concept for sample size in qualitative studies is "saturation." Saturation is closely tied to a specific methodology, and the term is inconsistently applied. We propose the concept "information power" to guide adequate sample size for qualitative studies. Information power indicates that the more information the sample holds, relevant for the actual study, the lower amount of participants is needed. We suggest that the size of a sample with sufficient information power depends on (a) the aim of the study, (b) sample specificity, (c) use of established theory, (d) quality of dialogue, and (e) analysis strategy. We present a model where these elements of information and their relevant dimensions are related to information power. Application of this model in the planning and during data collection of a qualitative study is discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields.

            We present a set of evolving guidelines for reviewing qualitative research, to serve four functions: to contribute to the process of legitimizing qualitative research; to ensure more appropriate and valid scientific reviews of qualitative manuscripts, theses, and dissertations; to encourage better quality control in qualitative research through better self- and other-monitoring; and to encourage further developments in approach and method. Building on a review of existing principles of good practice in qualitative research, we used an iterative process of revision and feedback from colleagues who engage in qualitative research, resulting in a set of seven guidelines common to both qualitative and quantitative research and seven guidelines especially pertinent to qualitative investigations in psychology and related social sciences. The Evolving Guidelines are subject to continuing revision and should not be used in a rigid manner, in order to avoid stifling creativity in this rapidly evolving, rich research tradition.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Health Promot Int
                Health Promot Int
                heapro
                Health Promotion International
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0957-4824
                1460-2245
                June 2024
                26 June 2024
                26 June 2024
                : 39
                : 3
                : daae061
                Affiliations
                Faculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University , 1 Geringhap Street, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia
                Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Population Health, Curtin University , Australia
                Faculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University , 1 Geringhap Street, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia
                Faculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University , 1 Geringhap Street, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia
                Faculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University , 1 Geringhap Street, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia
                College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork , Cork, Ireland
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. E-mail: samantha.thomas@ 123456deakin.edu.au
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-7775
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4259-6186
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2671-3511
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5646-6366
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7742-8118
                Article
                daae061
                10.1093/heapro/daae061
                11200187
                38920273
                2deb8acc-926c-4f72-80d4-3c0e14bd85da
                © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: Irish Research Council, DOI 10.13039/501100002081;
                Award ID: GOIPD/2023/1168
                Funded by: Irish Hospice Foundation, DOI 10.13039/501100001595;
                Award ID: NF/2021/27123063
                Categories
                Article
                Methodological Advances
                AcademicSubjects/MED00860

                Public health
                qualitative surveys,qualitative research,online methods,public health,reflexive thematic analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article