20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Yorkshire Enhanced Stop Smoking (YESS) study: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of adding a personalised smoking cessation intervention to a lung cancer screening programme

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Integration of smoking cessation (SC) into lung cancer screening is essential to optimise clinical and cost effectiveness. The most effective way to use this ‘teachable moment’ is unclear. The Yorkshire Enhanced Stop Smoking study will measure the effectiveness of an SC service integrated within the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST) and will test the efficacy of a personalised SC intervention, incorporating incidental findings detected on the low-dose CT scan performed as part of YLST.

          Methods and analysis

          Unless explicitly declined, all smokers enrolled in YLST will see an SC practitioner at baseline and receive SC support over 4 weeks comprising behavioural support, pharmacotherapy and/or a commercially available e-cigarette. Eligible smokers will be randomised (1:1 in permuted blocks of random size up to size 6) to receive either an enhanced, personalised SC support package, including CT scan images, or continued standard best practice. Anticipated recruitment is 1040 smokers (January 2019–December 2020). The primary objective is to measure 7-day point prevalent carbon monoxide (CO) validated SC after 3 months. Secondary outcomes include CO validated cessation at 4 weeks and 12 months, self-reported continuous cessation at 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months, attempts to quit smoking and changes in psychological variables, including perceived risk of lung cancer, motivation to quit smoking tobacco, confidence and efficacy beliefs (self and response) at all follow-up points. A process evaluation will explore under which circumstances and on which groups the intervention works best, test intervention fidelity and theory test the mechanisms of intervention impact.

          Ethics and dissemination

          This study has been approved by the East Midlands-Derby Research Ethics Committee (18/EM/0199) and the Health Research Authority/Health and Care Research Wales. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals, presentation at conferences and via the YLST website.

          Trial registration numbers

          ISRCTN63825779, NCT03750110.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

            Background The Framework Method is becoming an increasingly popular approach to the management and analysis of qualitative data in health research. However, there is confusion about its potential application and limitations. Discussion The article discusses when it is appropriate to adopt the Framework Method and explains the procedure for using it in multi-disciplinary health research teams, or those that involve clinicians, patients and lay people. The stages of the method are illustrated using examples from a published study. Summary Used effectively, with the leadership of an experienced qualitative researcher, the Framework Method is a systematic and flexible approach to analysing qualitative data and is appropriate for use in research teams even where not all members have previous experience of conducting qualitative research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.

              The protocol of a clinical trial serves as the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and appraisal. However, trial protocols and existing protocol guidelines vary greatly in content and quality. This article describes the systematic development and scope of SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) 2013, a guideline for the minimum content of a clinical trial protocol.The 33-item SPIRIT checklist applies to protocols for all clinical trials and focuses on content rather than format. The checklist recommends a full description of what is planned; it does not prescribe how to design or conduct a trial. By providing guidance for key content, the SPIRIT recommendations aim to facilitate the drafting of high-quality protocols. Adherence to SPIRIT would also enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, sponsors, funders, research ethics committees or institutional review boards, peer reviewers, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators, and other key stakeholders.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2020
                10 September 2020
                : 10
                : 9
                : e037086
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDivision of Epidemiology & Public Health, Faculty of Medicine , University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom
                [2 ] departmentUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies , University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom
                [3 ] departmentDivision of Population Medicine , Cardiff University , Cardiff, United Kingdom
                [4 ] departmentResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health , University College London , London, United Kingdom
                [5 ] departmentDepartment of Health Sciences , University of York , York, UK
                [6 ] departmentDepartment of Radiology , Leeds Teaching Hospitals , Leeds, United Kingdom
                [7 ] departmentDeaprtment of Respiratory Medicine , Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust , Nottingham, United Kingdom
                [8 ] departmentDivision of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine , The University of Manchester , Wythenshawe, UK
                [9 ] departmentInstitute of Health Science , University of Leeds , Leeds, United Kingdom
                [10 ] departmentResearch and Innivation CSU , Leeds Teaching Hospitals , Leeds, United Kingdom
                [11 ] departmentDepartment of Respiratory Medicine , Leeds Teaching Hospitals , Leeds, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Rachael L Murray; rachael.murray@ 123456nottingham.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5477-2557
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8079-2540
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8410-7160
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8941-4813
                Article
                bmjopen-2020-037086
                10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037086
                7485260
                32912948
                2d2230ee-bbe9-4fcb-92ba-a128137895b0
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 January 2020
                : 28 January 2020
                : 03 February 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002653, Yorkshire Cancer Research;
                Award ID: NOT414
                Categories
                Smoking and Tobacco
                1506
                1734
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                protocols & guidelines,public health,ct
                Medicine
                protocols & guidelines, public health, ct

                Comments

                Comment on this article