There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Objective
In this study, the effect of in vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer (IVF-ET) on the
clinical outcome of patients with syphilis infertility during resuscitation cycle.
Methods
A retrospective single-center method was adopted. This study included 4430 pairs of
infertile patients who underwent syphilis detection. The influence of the syphilis
freeze-thaw embryos transplantation outcome was studied in the patients with infertility
by comparing the general clinical characteristics of patients (age, years of infertility,
body mass index (BMI), basal follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), serum basal estradiol
(Estradiol, E2), transplanted intimal thickness, the number of embryos transferred)
and the clinical pregnancy (biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation
rate, live birth rate and abortion rate).
Results
Firstly, in the clinical outcome of one frozen-thawed embryos transfer, the live birth
rate of the woman's syphilis-infected group was lower than that of the uninfected
group (71.3 % vs. 50.0 %), while the abortion rate was higher than that of the uninfected
group (7.8 % vs. 26.7 %), and there was a statistical difference (
P < 0.05), and there was no statistical difference in other indicators between other
groups (
P > 0.05). Secondly, in the clinical outcome of two frozen-thawed embryos transfers,
the biochemical pregnancy rate (61.3 % vs. 28.6 %) and clinical pregnancy rate (42.9 %
vs. 14.3 %) of the group which was infected with syphilis alone were lower than those
of the uninfected group (
P < 0.05), and other indicators among the other groups showed no statistical difference
(
P > 0.05). Thirdly, in the clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryos transfer three
times or more, there was no significant difference in the clinical indicators between
the syphilis infertility patients and the non-infected infertility patients (
P > 0.05).
Conclusion
When the syphilis infertility patients and the non-infected infertile patients underwent
IVF-ET treatment for the first time, the live birth rate and abortion rate of the
syphilis group were significantly different (
P < 0.05). In the outcome of two transplants, the biochemical pregnancy rate and clinical
Pregnancy rates were significantly reduced so patients with syphilis infertility who
undergo IVF-ET should be informed about the risk of adverse clinical outcomes.
Highlights
•
The live birth rate and abortion rate of the syphilis group were significantly different.
•
The biochemical pregnancy rate and clinical pregnancy rate of the syphilis group were
lower than that of the uninfected infertile patients, which suggested that syphilis
has a certain correlation with repeated implantation failure in infertile patients.
•
Patients with syphilis infertility who undergo IVF-ET should be informed about the
risk of adverse clinical outcomes.
Gonorrhoea and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Neisseria gonorrhoeae are major health concerns globally. Increased global surveillance of gonococcal AMR is essential. We aimed to describe the 2017-18 data from WHO's global gonococcal AMR surveillance, and to discuss priorities essential for the effective management and control of gonorrhoea.
Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does a policy of elective freezing of embryos, followed by frozen embryo transfer result in a higher healthy baby rate, after first embryo transfer, when compared with the current policy of transferring fresh embryos? SUMMARY ANSWER This study, although limited by sample size, provides no evidence to support the adoption of a routine policy of elective freeze in preference to fresh embryo transfer in order to improve IVF effectiveness in obtaining a healthy baby. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The policy of freezing all embryos followed by frozen embryo transfer is associated with a higher live birth rate for high responders but a similar/lower live birth after first embryo transfer and cumulative live birth rate for normal responders. Frozen embryo transfer is associated with a lower risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), preterm delivery and low birthweight babies but a higher risk of large babies and pre-eclampsia. There is also uncertainty about long-term outcomes, hence shifting to a policy of elective freezing for all remains controversial given the delay in treatment and extra costs involved in freezing all embryos. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A pragmatic two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial (E-Freeze) was conducted across 18 clinics in the UK from 2016 to 2019. A total of 619 couples were randomized (309 to elective freeze/310 to fresh). The primary outcome was a healthy baby after first embryo transfer (term, singleton live birth with appropriate weight for gestation); secondary outcomes included OHSS, live birth, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy complications and cost-effectiveness. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Couples undergoing their first, second or third cycle of IVF/ICSI treatment, with at least three good quality embryos on Day 3 where the female partner was ≥18 and <42 years of age were eligible. Those using donor gametes, undergoing preimplantation genetic testing or planning to freeze all their embryos were excluded. IVF/ICSI treatment was carried out according to local protocols. Women were followed up for pregnancy outcome after first embryo transfer following randomization. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Of the 619 couples randomized, 307 and 309 couples in the elective freeze and fresh transfer arms, respectively, were included in the primary analysis. There was no evidence of a statistically significant difference in outcomes in the elective freeze group compared to the fresh embryo transfer group: healthy baby rate {20.3% (62/307) versus 24.4% (75/309); risk ratio (RR), 95% CI: 0.84, 0.62 to 1.15}; OHSS (3.6% versus 8.1%; RR, 99% CI: 0.44, 0.15 to 1.30); live birth rate (28.3% versus 34.3%; RR, 99% CI 0.83, 0.65 to 1.06); and miscarriage (14.3% versus 12.9%; RR, 99% CI: 1.09, 0.72 to 1.66). Adherence to allocation was poor in the elective freeze group. The elective freeze approach was more costly and was unlikely to be cost-effective in a UK National Health Service context. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION We have only reported on first embryo transfer after randomization; data on the cumulative live birth rate requires further follow-up. Planned target sample size was not obtained and the non-adherence to allocation rate was high among couples in the elective freeze arm owing to patient preference for fresh embryo transfer, but an analysis which took non-adherence into account showed similar results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Results from the E-Freeze trial do not lend support to the policy of electively freezing all for everyone, taking both efficacy, safety and costs considerations into account. This method should only be adopted if there is a definite clinical indication. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme (13/115/82). This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (NIHR unique award identifier) using UK aid from the UK Government to support global health research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the UK Department of Health and Social Care. J.L.B., C.C., E.J., P.H., J.J.K., L.L. and G.S. report receipt of funding from NIHR, during the conduct of the study. J.L.B., E.J., P.H., K.S. and L.L. report receipt of funding from NIHR, during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. A.M. reports grants from NIHR personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees for lectures from Merck Serono, Ferring and Cooks outside the submitted work; travel/meeting support from Ferring and Pharmasure and participation in a Ferring advisory board. S.B. reports receipt of royalties and licenses from Cambridge University Press, a board membership role for NHS Grampian and other financial or non-financial interests related to his roles as Editor-in-Chief of Human Reproduction Open and Editor and Contributing Author of Reproductive Medicine for the MRCOG, Cambridge University Press. D.B. reports grants from NIHR, during the conduct of the study; grants from European Commission, grants from Diabetes UK, grants from NIHR, grants from ESHRE, grants from MRC, outside the submitted work. Y.C. reports speaker fees from Merck Serono, and advisory board role for Merck Serono and shares in Complete Fertility. P.H. reports membership of the HTA Commissioning Committee. E.J. reports membership of the NHS England and NIHR Partnership Programme, membership of five Data Monitoring Committees (Chair of two), membership of six Trial Steering Committees (Chair of four), membership of the Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit Advisory Group and Chair of the board of Oxford Brain Health Clinical Trials Unit. R.M. reports consulting fees from Gedeon Richter, honorarium from Merck, support fees for attendance at educational events and conferences for Merck, Ferring, Bessins and Gedeon Richter, payments for participation on a Merck Safety or Advisory Board, Chair of the British Fertility Society and payments for an advisory role to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. G.S. reports travel and accommodation fees for attendance at a health economic advisory board from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. N.R.-F. reports shares in Nurture Fertility. Other authors’ competing interests: none declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN: 61225414. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 29 December 2015. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 16 February 2016.
Chronic endometritis is associated with abnormal uterine bleeding, recurrent abortion and infertility. It is a subtle condition, and therefore is difficult to diagnose. The diagnosis is ultimately based on the presence of plasma cells in the endometrial stroma on histopathological examination. Literature on the reproducibility of the diagnosis of chronic endometritis is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to assess the interobserver agreement of two pathologists in diagnosing chronic endometritis in asymptomatic, infertile patients. In the context of a randomized controlled trial, an endometrial biopsy was taken during a screening hysteroscopy prior to IVF. All endometrial samples were independently examined by two pathologist. The slides diagnosed with chronic endometritis were replenished with a random sample of the remaining slides up to a total of 100, then exchanged between the two pathologists and reassessed. Of the 678 patients who underwent hysteroscopy, 19 patients were diagnosed with at least possible chronic endometritis (2.8%). Perfect agreement between the pathologists, before and after inclusion of 13 slides with additional immunohistochemistry staining, was found in 88 and 86% of reviews, respectively. The interobserver agreement was substantial, with kappa-values of 0.55 and 0.66, respectively. The interobserver agreement in diagnosing chronic endometritis in asymptomatic infertile patients was found to be substantial. Although the diagnostic reliability is sufficient with the methods in the present study, the low prevalence and unknown clinical significance of endometritis warrants further study.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.