30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: a matched-pair comparison with the gold standard

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the gold-standard for the surgical treatment of most adrenal lesions. This study evaluated the operative outcome of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (LESS-ARA) in comparison with the current standard operation procedure.

          Methods

          Between June and December 2009, 19 patients underwent LESS-ARA, and their outcomes were compared with a contemporary 1:2 matched-pair cohort of 38 patients who underwent standard ARA by the same surgeon. In LESS-ARA, a multichannel port was inserted through a 2.5- to 3.0-cm transverse skin incision below the tip of the 12th rib. The LESS-ARA procedure was performed using a 5-mm 30º laparoscopic camera and two standard laparoscopic instruments. The following parameters were compared between the two groups: demographics, details of the surgery, perioperative complications, postoperative visual analog pain scale score, analgesic requirement, and short-term measures of convalescence.

          Results

          The finding showed that LESS-ARA and standard ARA were comparable in terms of the estimated blood loss (30 vs 17.5 ml; p = 0.64), postoperative hospital stay (6 vs 6 days; p = 0.67), and postoperative complications (2 vs 3 patients; p = 1.00) for patients with similar baseline demographics and median tumor size (2.1 vs 3.0; p = 0.18) cm. The intraoperative hemodynamic values were similar in the two groups. The LESS-ARA group had a longer median operative time (55 vs 41.5 min; p = 0.0004), whereas the in-hospital use of analgesics was significantly less (5 vs 12 morphine equivalents; p = 0.03).

          Conclusions

          The LESS retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy approach is feasible and offers a superior cosmetic outcome and better pain control, with perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence similar to those of the standard approach, albeit with a longer operative time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status.

          Single-port transumbilical laparoscopy, also known as embryonic natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES), has emerged as an attempt to further enhance cosmetic benefits and reduce morbidity of minimally invasive surgery. Within a short span, several clinical reports have emerged in the urologic literature. As this field is poised to move forward, a complete understanding of its evolution and current status is timely. To summarize and review the history of E-NOTES across surgical disciplines. This review emphasizes nomenclature, surgical technique, instrumentation, and perioperative outcomes. Specific urological and nonurological applications of single-port surgery to date are summarized. Using the National Library of Medicine database, the English-language literature was reviewed for the past 40 yr. Keyword searches included: scarless, scar free, single port/trocar/incision, intraumbilical, and transumbilical. Within the bibliography of selected references, additional sources were retrieved. The gynecologic and general surgical literature includes approximately 19 papers fulfilling the search criteria, encompassing extirpative procedures only. The urologic literature contains eight published reports of single-trocar transumbilical procedures. These reports are summarized in a chronological manner and grouped by subject. No prospective studies comparing outcomes to standard laparoscopy have been reported. Technical feasibility has been demonstrated for a broad range of extirpative and reconstructive procedures on the upper and lower urinary tracts, including simple and radical nephrectomy, donor nephrectomy, renal cryotherapy, pyeloplasty, ileal ureteral replacement, sacrocolpopexy, and varicocelectomy. E-NOTES has made its initial forays into laparoscopic surgery. Ongoing refinement in technique and instrumentation is likely to expand its future role.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: new gold standard.

            Nearly 600 cases of laparoscopic adrenalectomy have been described in the world literature, documenting the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. Comparative studies have demonstrated the advantages of the laparoscopic approach when compared to traditional open approaches to adrenalectomy, documenting a more rapid and comfortable recovery, shorter hospitalization, and fewer complications. Several techniques of laparoscopic adrenalectomy have been described. We prefer the transabdominal approach in the lateral decubitus position. Herein we report our experience with 28 adrenalectomies using this approach. Indications for adrenalectomy have been hyperaldosteronism (9), hypercortisolism (4), pheochromocytoma (3), incidentaloma (6), metastasis (3), lymphoma (1), angiomyolipoma (1), other (1). Average tumor size was 3.3 cm (1. 4-8.3 cm). Average operative time was 152 minutes (110-210 minutes), with left adrenalectomy taking slightly longer to perform than on the right (156 vs. 145 minutes). There were no intraoperative complications and one conversion to open adrenalectomy for a large metastatic lung cancer found to be invading the liver. One patient experienced left rib pain from a cannula site immediately at the costal margin. There were no other complications. Average length of hospitalization was 2.3 days (1-6 days). With this and others' experience, laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the gold standard for adrenalectomy. This manuscript reviews the literature on laparoscopic adrenalectomy and describes the transabdominal lateral approach.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.

              Recent reports have suggested that single-port or single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is technically feasible. To present a comparison between SILS and conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy with respect to perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. This was a case-control study comparing 11 SILS nephrectomies (cases) and 22 conventional laparoscopic nephrectomies (controls) performed from September 2004 to April 2008. The control group was matched in a 2:1 ratio to SILS cases with respect to patient age, surgical indication, and tumor size. A single surgeon performed all SILS nephrectomy cases using three adjacent 5-mm trocars inserted through a single 2.5-cm periumbilical incision. Demographics, operative time, blood loss, perioperative complications, transfusion requirement, decrease in serum hemoglobin, analgesic requirement, length of stay, and final pathology were compared. Mean patient age was 53 yr for both groups, with more females in the SILS cohort (82% vs 41%). Nephrectomy was performed for benign disease in 45% of the cases. Median tumor size was 5.5 cm for both groups, and all but one suspected malignancy was renal cell carcinoma on final pathology. There was no difference between SILS and conventional laparoscopy cases in median operative time (122 min vs 125 min, p=0.78), percent decrease from preoperative hemoglobin (14.1% vs 15.8%, p=0.52), analgesic use (8 morphine equivalents vs 15 morphine equivalents, p=0.69), length of stay (49 h vs. 53 h, p=0.44), or complication rate (0% for both). The SILS group did have a lower recorded median estimated blood loss (20 ml vs 100ml, p=0.001). This study is retrospective and is susceptible to all limitations and biases inherent in such a design. SILS nephrectomy is feasible with perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence comparable to conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy. Although SILS may offer a subjective cosmetic advantage, prospective comparison is needed to more clearly define its role.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +86-10-66938008 , +86-10-66938008 , xzhang@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn
                Journal
                Surg Endosc
                Surgical Endoscopy
                Springer-Verlag (New York )
                0930-2794
                1432-2218
                18 December 2010
                18 December 2010
                July 2011
                : 25
                : 7
                : 2117-2124
                Affiliations
                Department of Urology, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Military Postgraduate Medical College, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, 100853 Beijing, China
                Article
                1506
                10.1007/s00464-010-1506-z
                3116116
                21170658
                2cd2aa54-e112-46d6-a5c5-6ed875fd7e69
                © The Author(s) 2010
                History
                : 10 May 2010
                : 15 November 2010
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

                Surgery
                case-control study,laparoscopic surgery,convalescence,single incision,adrenalectomy
                Surgery
                case-control study, laparoscopic surgery, convalescence, single incision, adrenalectomy

                Comments

                Comment on this article