20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Deciphering the Genetics of Primary Angioedema with Normal Levels of C1 Inhibitor

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The genetic alteration underlying the great majority of primary angioedema with normal C1 inhibitor (nl-C1-INH-HAE) cases remains unknown. To search for variants associated with nl-C1-INH-HAE, we genotyped 133 unrelated nl-C1-INH-HAE patients using a custom next-generation sequencing platform targeting 55 genes possibly involved in angioedema pathogenesis. Patients already diagnosed with F12 alterations as well as those with histaminergic acquired angioedema were excluded. A variant pathogenicity curation strategy was followed, including a comparison of the results with those of genotyping 169 patients with hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE), and only filtered-in variants were studied further. Among the examined nl-C1-INH-HAE patients, carriers of neither the ANGPT1 p.Ala119Ser nor the KNG1 p.Met379Lys variant were found, whereas the PLG p.Lys330Glu was detected in four (3%) unrelated probands (one homozygote). In total, 182 different variants were curated, 21 of which represented novel mutations. Although the frequency of variants per gene was comparable between nl-C1-INH-HAE and C1-INH-HAE, variants of the KNG1 and XPNPEP1 genes were detected only in nl-C1-INH-HAE patients (six and three, respectively). Twenty-seven filtered variants in 23 different genes were detected in nl-C1-INH-HAE more than once, whereas 69/133 nl-C1-INH-HAE patients had compound heterozygotes of filtered variants located in the same or different genes. Pedigree analysis was performed where feasible. Our results indicate the role that alterations in some genes, like KNG1, may play in disease pathogenesis, the complex trait that is possibly underlying in some cases, and the existence of hitherto unrecognized disease endotypes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology

          The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) previously developed guidance for the interpretation of sequence variants. 1 In the past decade, sequencing technology has evolved rapidly with the advent of high-throughput next generation sequencing. By adopting and leveraging next generation sequencing, clinical laboratories are now performing an ever increasing catalogue of genetic testing spanning genotyping, single genes, gene panels, exomes, genomes, transcriptomes and epigenetic assays for genetic disorders. By virtue of increased complexity, this paradigm shift in genetic testing has been accompanied by new challenges in sequence interpretation. In this context, the ACMG convened a workgroup in 2013 comprised of representatives from the ACMG, the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) to revisit and revise the standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. The group consisted of clinical laboratory directors and clinicians. This report represents expert opinion of the workgroup with input from ACMG, AMP and CAP stakeholders. These recommendations primarily apply to the breadth of genetic tests used in clinical laboratories including genotyping, single genes, panels, exomes and genomes. This report recommends the use of specific standard terminology: ‘pathogenic’, ‘likely pathogenic’, ‘uncertain significance’, ‘likely benign’, and ‘benign’ to describe variants identified in Mendelian disorders. Moreover, this recommendation describes a process for classification of variants into these five categories based on criteria using typical types of variant evidence (e.g. population data, computational data, functional data, segregation data, etc.). Because of the increased complexity of analysis and interpretation of clinical genetic testing described in this report, the ACMG strongly recommends that clinical molecular genetic testing should be performed in a CLIA-approved laboratory with results interpreted by a board-certified clinical molecular geneticist or molecular genetic pathologist or equivalent.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A global reference for human genetic variation

            The 1000 Genomes Project set out to provide a comprehensive description of common human genetic variation by applying whole-genome sequencing to a diverse set of individuals from multiple populations. Here we report completion of the project, having reconstructed the genomes of 2,504 individuals from 26 populations using a combination of low-coverage whole-genome sequencing, deep exome sequencing, and dense microarray genotyping. We characterized a broad spectrum of genetic variation, in total over 88 million variants (84.7 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 3.6 million short insertions/deletions (indels), and 60,000 structural variants), all phased onto high-quality haplotypes. This resource includes >99% of SNP variants with a frequency of >1% for a variety of ancestries. We describe the distribution of genetic variation across the global sample, and discuss the implications for common disease studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Classification, diagnosis, and approach to treatment for angioedema: consensus report from the Hereditary Angioedema International Working Group.

              Angioedema is defined as localized and self-limiting edema of the subcutaneous and submucosal tissue, due to a temporary increase in vascular permeability caused by the release of vasoactive mediator(s). When angioedema recurs without significant wheals, the patient should be diagnosed to have angioedema as a distinct disease. In the absence of accepted classification, different types of angioedema are not uniquely identified. For this reason, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology gave its patronage to a consensus conference aimed at classifying angioedema. Four types of acquired and three types of hereditary angioedema were identified as separate forms from the analysis of the literature and were presented in detail at the meeting. Here, we summarize the analysis of the data and the resulting classification of angioedema. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                23 October 2020
                November 2020
                : 9
                : 11
                : 3402
                Affiliations
                [1 ]CeMIA SA, Makriyianni 31, GR-41334 Larissa, Greece; gedloules@ 123456cemia.eu (G.L.); fparsopoulou@ 123456cemia.eu (F.P.); mzamanakou@ 123456cemia.eu (M.Z.); svatsiou@ 123456cemia.eu (S.V.)
                [2 ]Department of Immunology & Histocompatibility, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Panepistimiou 3, GR-41500 Biopolis, Larissa, Greece; maspel@ 123456med.uth.gr
                [3 ]Hungarian Angioedema Center, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Kutvolgyi ut 4, H-1125 Budapest, Hungary; csuka.dorottya@ 123456med.semmelweis-univ.hu (D.C.); farkas.henriette@ 123456med.semmelweis-univ.hu (H.F.)
                [4 ]Department of Translational Medicine, University of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; bovamaria@ 123456virgilio.it
                [5 ]Reference Unit for Angioedema in Andalusia, Allergy Department, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Av Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Seville, Spain; mtgonzalezq@ 123456gmail.com
                [6 ]Department of Allergology, Navy Hospital, Deinokratous 70, GR-11521 Athens, Greece; psarros@ 123456allergy.gr
                [7 ]Department of Clinical and Environmental Allergology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Sniadeckich 10, 31-531 Krakow, Poland; g.porebski@ 123456uj.edu.pl
                [8 ]Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09042 Monserrato, Italy; davide.firinu@ 123456unica.it (D.F.); delgiac@ 123456gmail.com (S.d.G.)
                [9 ]Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco, University of Milan, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157 Milan, Italy; chiarasuffritti@ 123456gmail.com (C.S.); andrea.zanichelli@ 123456unimi.it (A.Z.)
                [10 ]Allergy Unit, 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Hospital “Attikon”, Rimini 1, GR-12462 Chaidari, Athens, Greece; mmakris.allergy@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: agermen@ 123456med.uth.gr
                [†]

                G.L. and F.P. contributed equally to this work as first authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3610-9852
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7655-0696
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-9134
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9810-3275
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6146-0188
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5768-391X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3315-6947
                Article
                jcm-09-03402
                10.3390/jcm9113402
                7690775
                33114181
                2cb06fd5-d4f8-4224-bc90-86c681019170
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 23 September 2020
                : 19 October 2020
                Categories
                Article

                next-generation sequencing,pedigree analysis,primary angioedema,primary angioedema with normal c1 inhibitor

                Comments

                Comment on this article