3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The negative effects of COVID-19 and national lockdown on emergency surgery morbidity due to delayed access

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The aim of this retrospective comparative study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 and delayed emergency department access on emergency surgery outcomes, by comparing the main clinical outcomes in the period March–May 2019 (group 1) with the same period during the national COVID-19 lockdown in Italy (March–May 2020, group 2).

          Methods

          A comparison (groups 1 versus 2) and subgroup analysis were performed between patients’ demographic, medical history, surgical, clinical and management characteristics.

          Results

          Two-hundred forty-six patients were included, 137 in group 1 and 109 in group 2 (p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in the peri-operative characteristics of the two groups. A declared delay in access to hospital and preoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were 15.5% and 5.8%, respectively in group 2. The overall morbidity (OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.08–4.55, p = 0.03) and 30-day mortality (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 0.33–5.50, =0.68) were significantly higher in group 2. The delayed access cohort showed a close correlation with increased morbidity (OR = 3.19, 95% CI 0.89–11.44, p = 0.07), blood transfusion (OR = 5.13, 95% CI 1.05–25.15, p = 0.04) and 30-day mortality risk (OR = 8.00, 95% CI 1.01–63.23, p = 0.05). SARS-CoV-2-positive patients had higher risk of blood transfusion (20% vs 7.8%, p = 0.37) and ICU admissions (20% vs 2.6%, p = 0.17) and a longer median LOS (9 days vs 4 days, p = 0.11).

          Conclusions

          This article provides enhanced understanding of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient access to emergency surgical care. Our findings suggest that COVID-19 changed the quality of surgical care with poorer prognosis and higher morbidity rates. Delayed emergency department access and a “filter effect” induced by a fear of COVID-19 infection in the population resulted in only the most severe cases reaching the emergency department in time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia

          Abstract Background The initial cases of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)–infected pneumonia (NCIP) occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in December 2019 and January 2020. We analyzed data on the first 425 confirmed cases in Wuhan to determine the epidemiologic characteristics of NCIP. Methods We collected information on demographic characteristics, exposure history, and illness timelines of laboratory-confirmed cases of NCIP that had been reported by January 22, 2020. We described characteristics of the cases and estimated the key epidemiologic time-delay distributions. In the early period of exponential growth, we estimated the epidemic doubling time and the basic reproductive number. Results Among the first 425 patients with confirmed NCIP, the median age was 59 years and 56% were male. The majority of cases (55%) with onset before January 1, 2020, were linked to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, as compared with 8.6% of the subsequent cases. The mean incubation period was 5.2 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1 to 7.0), with the 95th percentile of the distribution at 12.5 days. In its early stages, the epidemic doubled in size every 7.4 days. With a mean serial interval of 7.5 days (95% CI, 5.3 to 19), the basic reproductive number was estimated to be 2.2 (95% CI, 1.4 to 3.9). Conclusions On the basis of this information, there is evidence that human-to-human transmission has occurred among close contacts since the middle of December 2019. Considerable efforts to reduce transmission will be required to control outbreaks if similar dynamics apply elsewhere. Measures to prevent or reduce transmission should be implemented in populations at risk. (Funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China and others.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation

            The objective of this study was to develop a prospectively applicable method for classifying comorbid conditions which might alter the risk of mortality for use in longitudinal studies. A weighted index that takes into account the number and the seriousness of comorbid disease was developed in a cohort of 559 medical patients. The 1-yr mortality rates for the different scores were: "0", 12% (181); "1-2", 26% (225); "3-4", 52% (71); and "greater than or equal to 5", 85% (82). The index was tested for its ability to predict risk of death from comorbid disease in the second cohort of 685 patients during a 10-yr follow-up. The percent of patients who died of comorbid disease for the different scores were: "0", 8% (588); "1", 25% (54); "2", 48% (25); "greater than or equal to 3", 59% (18). With each increased level of the comorbidity index, there were stepwise increases in the cumulative mortality attributable to comorbid disease (log rank chi 2 = 165; p less than 0.0001). In this longer follow-up, age was also a predictor of mortality (p less than 0.001). The new index performed similarly to a previous system devised by Kaplan and Feinstein. The method of classifying comorbidity provides a simple, readily applicable and valid method of estimating risk of death from comorbid disease for use in longitudinal studies. Further work in larger populations is still required to refine the approach because the number of patients with any given condition in this study was relatively small.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

              The lack of consensus on how to define and grade adverse postoperative events has greatly hampered the evaluation of surgical procedures. A new classification of complications, initiated in 1992, was updated 5 years ago. It is based on the type of therapy needed to correct the complication. The principle of the classification was to be simple, reproducible, flexible, and applicable irrespective of the cultural background. The aim of the current study was to critically evaluate this classification from the perspective of its use in the literature, by assessing interobserver variability in grading complex complication scenarios and to correlate the classification grades with patients', nurses', and doctors' perception. Reports from the literature using the classification system were systematically analyzed. Next, 11 scenarios illustrating difficult cases were prepared to develop a consensus on how to rank the various complications. Third, 7 centers from different continents, having routinely used the classification, independently assessed the 11 scenarios. An agreement analysis was performed to test the accuracy and reliability of the classification. Finally, the perception of the severity was tested in patients, nurses, and physicians by presenting 30 scenarios, each illustrating a specific grade of complication. We noted a dramatic increase in the use of the classification in many fields of surgery. About half of the studies used the contracted form, whereas the rest used the full range of grading. Two-thirds of the publications avoided subjective terms such as minor or major complications. The study of 11 difficult cases among various centers revealed a high degree of agreement in identifying and ranking complications (89% agreement), and enabled a better definition of unclear situations. Each grade of complications significantly correlated with the perception by patients, nurses, and physicians (P < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test). This 5-year evaluation provides strong evidence that the classification is valid and applicable worldwide in many fields of surgery. No modification in the general principle of classification is warranted in view of the use in ongoing publications and trials. Subjective, inaccurate, or confusing terms such as "minor or major" should be removed from the surgical literature.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                francesco.ciarleglio@apss.tn.it
                mrigoni@fbk.eu
                liliana.mereu@apss.tn.it
                tommaso.cai@apss.tn.it
                alessandro.carrara@apss.tn.it
                gianni.malossini@apss.tn.it
                saverio.tateo@apss.tn.it
                giuseppe.tirone@apss.tn.it
                t.e.b.johansen@medisin.uio.no
                gianpaolo.benetollo@apss.tn.it
                antonio.ferro@apss.tn.it
                giovanni.guarrera@apss.tn.it
                mario.grattarola@apss.tn.it
                giandomenico.nollo@unitn.it
                alberto.brolese@apss.tn.it
                Journal
                World J Emerg Surg
                World J Emerg Surg
                World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES
                BioMed Central (London )
                1749-7922
                13 July 2021
                13 July 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 37
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.415176.0, ISNI 0000 0004 1763 6494, General Surgery II & HPB Unit, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), , Santa Chiara Hospital, ; Largo Medaglie d’Oro, 1, 38122 Trento, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.11469.3b, ISNI 0000 0000 9780 0901, IRCS – Innovation and Clinical Health Research - Bruno Kessler Foundation (FBK), ; 38123 Trento, Italy
                [3 ]GRID grid.11696.39, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0351, Department of Industrial Engineering, BIOtech Lab, , University of Trento, ; 38122 Trento, Italy
                [4 ]GRID grid.415176.0, ISNI 0000 0004 1763 6494, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), , Santa Chiara Hospital, ; 38122 Trento, Italy
                [5 ]GRID grid.415176.0, ISNI 0000 0004 1763 6494, Urology Unit, APSS, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), , Santa Chiara Hospital, ; 38122 Trento, Italy
                [6 ]GRID grid.415176.0, ISNI 0000 0004 1763 6494, General Surgery I & Thoracic Unit, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), , Santa Chiara Hospital, ; 38122 Trento, Italy
                [7 ]GRID grid.5510.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8921, Institute of Clinical Medicine, , University of Oslo, ; Oslo, Norway
                [8 ]GRID grid.55325.34, ISNI 0000 0004 0389 8485, Department of Urology, , Oslo University Hospital, ; Oslo, Norway
                [9 ]GRID grid.7048.b, ISNI 0000 0001 1956 2722, Institute of Clinical Medicine, , University of Aarhus, ; Aarhus, Denmark
                [10 ]GRID grid.415176.0, ISNI 0000 0004 1763 6494, Provincial Health Care Agency Staff Management, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), , Santa Chiara Hospital, ; Trento, Italy
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1489-1954
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0530-9491
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0610-5132
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7234-3526
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9508-335X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8766-814X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5824-8020
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3490-6460
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2041-8194
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9841-1972
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9837-083X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-9055
                Article
                382
                10.1186/s13017-021-00382-z
                8276199
                34256781
                2c9fd364-5bb1-4fde-addc-2e8ec1e2e572
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 12 February 2021
                : 26 June 2021
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Surgery
                covid-19 disease,surgical care,delayed access,emergency surgery,complications
                Surgery
                covid-19 disease, surgical care, delayed access, emergency surgery, complications

                Comments

                Comment on this article