7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Modeling late-onset Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology via direct neuronal reprogramming

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD) is the most common form of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, modeling sporadic LOAD that endogenously captures hallmark neuronal pathologies such as amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition, tau tangles, and neuronal loss remains an unmet need. We demonstrate that neurons generated by microRNA (miRNA)–based direct reprogramming of fibroblasts from individuals affected by autosomal dominant AD (ADAD) and LOAD in a three-dimensional environment effectively recapitulate key neuropathological features of AD. Reprogrammed LOAD neurons exhibit Aβ-dependent neurodegeneration, and treatment with β- or γ-secretase inhibitors before (but not subsequent to) Aβ deposit formation mitigated neuronal death. Moreover inhibiting age-associated retrotransposable elements in LOAD neurons reduced both Aβ deposition and neurodegeneration. Our study underscores the efficacy of modeling late-onset neuropathology of LOAD through high-efficiency miRNA-based neuronal reprogramming.

          Editor’s summary

          The ability to model Alzheimer’s disease is critical for understanding the pathophysiology of the disease and for identifying effective therapies. Sporadic, nongenetic, late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD) is the most common form, but unfortunately, LOAD models are lacking. Sun et al . developed a microRNA-based direct reprogramming approach using fibroblasts from individuals with LOAD. The authors generated neurons presenting the major hallmarks of the disease, including depositions of the proteins Aβ and tau and dysregulation of age-associated transposable elements. Preventing transposable element dysregulation rescued neurodegeneration and reduced Aβ deposition. Using direct reprogramming for modeling LOAD could help in the development of treatments for this incurable disorder. —Mattia Maroso

          Abstract

          INTRODUCTION

          Extracellular accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) deposits, insoluble tau formation, and neuronal loss are critical neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Research on AD models has predominantly focused on genetic mutations linked to early-onset autosomal dominant AD (ADAD). However, the ability to model the age-associated neuropathological features of sporadic late-onset AD (LOAD), accounting for over 95% of cases, remains a major challenge. This gap is due to the complexity of LOAD stemming from various risk factors, including aging. Induced pluripotent stem cells have enabled the generation of human neurons. However, these stem cell–based neurons revert to a fetal-like cellular age, limiting their utility in reflecting age-associated characteristics. Alternatively, direct neuronal reprogramming of patient somatic cells such as fibroblasts retains age-related traits. We use brain-enriched microRNAs (miRNAs), miR-9/9*, and miR-124, as highly efficient reprogramming effectors to generate LOAD neurons in three-dimensional (3D) environment as a robust platform for capturing critical age-associated AD phenotypes.

          RATIONALE

          Neurons generated by 3D-direct neuronal reprogramming of LOAD patient fibroblasts would carry identical genetic information and retain the cellular age of affected elderly individuals. We thus hypothesize that miRNA-induced LOAD neurons would recapitulate age-associated degenerative processes characterized by late-onset neuropathological features of AD.

          RESULTS

          As proof of principle, cortical neurons were generated by neuronal conversion of fibroblasts from individuals with ADAD using miR-9/9*-124 along with NEUROD2 and MYT1L. MiRNA-induced neurons were cultured in 3D environments consisting of (i) a thin Matrigel layer embedded with AD neurons and (ii) high cell density, self-assembled spheroids comprised of directly reprogrammed neurons. AD phenotypes were assessed in comparison to age-matched control neurons from cognitively normal individuals. We found that 3D ADAD neurons exhibited extracellular accumulation of Aβ, formation of seed-competent and insoluble tau, bulged dystrophic neurites, and neurodegeneration. Importantly, applying this 3D neuronal reprogramming to fibroblasts from individuals with LOAD effectively manifested hallmark AD neuropathological features. Notably, inhibiting APP processing during the early phase of neuronal reprogramming reduced the accumulation of Aβ deposits, tauopathy, and neurodegeneration whereas treatment during the late phase when Aβ deposits had already begun to form was ineffective. Additionally, LOAD neurons exhibited gene expression changes related to neuroinflammation compared to age-matched controls. Notably, both aged healthy control (aged 66 to 90) and LOAD (aged 66 to 90) neurons manifested changes in retrotransposon elements (RTE) expression compared to young healthy control neurons (aged 36 to 61). Disrupting age-associated RTE dysregulation in LOAD neurons using lamivudine (3TC) led to the reduction of Aβ, tau aggregation, neuronal death, and DNA damage, correlated with expression changes of genes associated with inflammation.

          CONCLUSION

          The findings demonstrate the feasibility and sufficiency of miRNA-induced LOAD neurons for modeling late-onset neuropathology of AD in a 3D environment. These neurons provide a platform to understand how aging influences vulnerability to late-onset neurodegeneration in LOAD patients. Extending the current study, future research goals should be directed toward identifying additional aging mechanisms contributing to AD pathogenesis, mechanisms related to AD risk genes expressed in neurons, and interactions with other brain cell types that may influence pathological features of AD in patient-derived neurons.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types

          Background It is not yet known whether DNA methylation levels can be used to accurately predict age across a broad spectrum of human tissues and cell types, nor whether the resulting age prediction is a biologically meaningful measure. Results I developed a multi-tissue predictor of age that allows one to estimate the DNA methylation age of most tissues and cell types. The predictor, which is freely available, was developed using 8,000 samples from 82 Illumina DNA methylation array datasets, encompassing 51 healthy tissues and cell types. I found that DNA methylation age has the following properties: first, it is close to zero for embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells; second, it correlates with cell passage number; third, it gives rise to a highly heritable measure of age acceleration; and, fourth, it is applicable to chimpanzee tissues. Analysis of 6,000 cancer samples from 32 datasets showed that all of the considered 20 cancer types exhibit significant age acceleration, with an average of 36 years. Low age-acceleration of cancer tissue is associated with a high number of somatic mutations and TP53 mutations, while mutations in steroid receptors greatly accelerate DNA methylation age in breast cancer. Finally, I characterize the 353 CpG sites that together form an aging clock in terms of chromatin states and tissue variance. Conclusions I propose that DNA methylation age measures the cumulative effect of an epigenetic maintenance system. This novel epigenetic clock can be used to address a host of questions in developmental biology, cancer and aging research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies

            Alzheimer disease (AD) is a heterogeneous disease with a complex pathobiology. The presence of extracellular amyloid-β deposition as neuritic plaques and intracellular accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau as neurofibrillary tangles remain the primary neuropathologic criteria for AD diagnosis. However, a number of recent fundamental discoveries highlight important pathological roles for other critical cellular and molecular processes. Despite this, no disease modifying treatment currently exists and numerous phase 3 clinical trials have failed to demonstrate benefit. We review here recent advances in our understanding of AD pathobiology and discuss current treatment strategies, highlighting recent clinical trials and opportunities for developing future disease modifying therapies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intraneuronal beta-amyloid aggregates, neurodegeneration, and neuron loss in transgenic mice with five familial Alzheimer's disease mutations: potential factors in amyloid plaque formation.

              Mutations in the genes for amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilins (PS1, PS2) increase production of beta-amyloid 42 (Abeta42) and cause familial Alzheimer's disease (FAD). Transgenic mice that express FAD mutant APP and PS1 overproduce Abeta42 and exhibit amyloid plaque pathology similar to that found in AD, but most transgenic models develop plaques slowly. To accelerate plaque development and investigate the effects of very high cerebral Abeta42 levels, we generated APP/PS1 double transgenic mice that coexpress five FAD mutations (5XFAD mice) and additively increase Abeta42 production. 5XFAD mice generate Abeta42 almost exclusively and rapidly accumulate massive cerebral Abeta42 levels. Amyloid deposition (and gliosis) begins at 2 months and reaches a very large burden, especially in subiculum and deep cortical layers. Intraneuronal Abeta42 accumulates in 5XFAD brain starting at 1.5 months of age (before plaques form), is aggregated (as determined by thioflavin S staining), and occurs within neuron soma and neurites. Some amyloid deposits originate within morphologically abnormal neuron soma that contain intraneuronal Abeta. Synaptic markers synaptophysin, syntaxin, and postsynaptic density-95 decrease with age in 5XFAD brain, and large pyramidal neurons in cortical layer 5 and subiculum are lost. In addition, levels of the activation subunit of cyclin-dependent kinase 5, p25, are elevated significantly at 9 months in 5XFAD brain, although an upward trend is observed by 3 months of age, before significant neurodegeneration or neuron loss. Finally, 5XFAD mice have impaired memory in the Y-maze. Thus, 5XFAD mice rapidly recapitulate major features of AD amyloid pathology and may be useful models of intraneuronal Abeta42-induced neurodegeneration and amyloid plaque formation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Science
                Science
                American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
                0036-8075
                1095-9203
                August 02 2024
                August 02 2024
                : 385
                : 6708
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
                [2 ]Center for Regenerative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
                [3 ]Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
                [4 ]Program in Computational and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
                [5 ]Program in Developmental, Regenerative, and Stem Cell Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
                [6 ]Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
                [7 ]Program in Molecular Genetics and Genomics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
                [8 ]Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
                [9 ]Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
                [10 ]Washington University Center for Cellular Imaging, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
                [11 ]Center for Alzheimer’s and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Peter O’Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
                [12 ]UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
                [13 ]Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
                [14 ]Tracy Family SILQ Center for Neurodegenerative Biology, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
                [15 ]Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
                [16 ]Genetics and Aging Research Unit, MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease, McCance Center for Brain Health, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
                Article
                10.1126/science.adl2992
                39088624
                2c85118b-6001-472f-9f3b-f920df79cde1
                © 2024

                Free to read

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article