Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole–induced aseptic meningitis—not just another sulfa allergy

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) result in major health problems in the United States in both the inpatient and outpatient setting. ADRs are broadly categorized into predictable (type A and unpredictable (type B) reactions. Predictable reactions are usually dose dependent, are related to the known pharmacologic actions of the drug, and occur in otherwise healthy individuals, They are estimated to comprise approximately 80% of all ADRs. Unpredictable are generally dose independent, are unrelated to the pharmacologic actions of the drug, and occur only in susceptible individuals. Unpredictable reactions are subdivided into drug intolerance, drug idiosyncrasy, drug allergy, and pseudoallergic reactions. Both type A and B reactions may be influenced by genetic predisposition of the patient

The diagnosis of a drug allergy is mainly based upon a very detailed history and the clinical findings. In addition, several in vitro or in vivo tests can be performed to demonstrate a sensitization to a certain drug. One of the in vitro tests is the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT), which can reveal a sensitization of T-cells by an enhanced proliferative response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to a certain drug. To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the LTT, 923 case histories of patients with suspected drug allergy in whom a LTT was performed were retrospectively analysed. Based on the history and provocation tests, the probability (P) of a drug allergy was estimated to be > 0.9, 0.5-0.9, 0.1-0.5 or 0.9) had a positive LTT, which indicates a sensitivity of 78%. If allergies to betalactam-antibiotics were analysed separately, the sensitivity was 74.4%. Fifteen of 102 patients where a classical drug allergy could be excluded (P < 0.1), had nevertheless a positive LTT (specificity thus 85%). The majority of these cases were classified as so-called pseudo-allergic reaction to NSAIDs. Patients with a clear history and clinical findings for a cotrimoxazole-related allergy, all had a positive LTT (6/6), and in patients who reacted to drugs containing proteins, sensitization could be demonstrated as well (i.e. hen's egg lysozyme, 7/7). In 632 of the 923 cases, skin tests were also performed (scratch and/or epicutaneous), for which we found a lower sensitivity than for the LTT (64%), while the specificity was the same (85%). Although our data are somewhat biased by the high number of penicillin allergies and cannot be generalized to drug allergies caused by other compounds, we conclude that the LTT is a useful diagnostic test in drug allergies, able to support the diagnosis of a drug allergy and to pinpoint the relevant drug.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions can cause a variety of serious diseases by involving drug-specific T-cells. Many of these reactions have been explained by the hapten concept, which postulates that small chemical compounds need to bind covalently to proteins to be recognized by the immune system. Due to their chemical reactivity, haptens stimulate the innate immunity by binding covalently to endogenous proteins and form so called hapten-carrier complexes, which are antigenic and induce T-cell responses. In recent years, a new concept has been developed since drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions were also observed with chemically unreactive drugs. This concept implies direct and reversible interactions of the drug between T-cell receptors (TCR) and major histocompatability complex (MHC) molecules. Therefore it was termed pharmacological interactions with immune receptors (p-i concept). Early observations on drug reacting T-cell clones (TCC) let believe that drugs bind first to the T-cell receptor since HLA molecules could be exchanged without affecting the drug reactivity. However, MHC molecules were always required for full activation of TCC. According to its strong HLA-B*5701 association, recent data on abacavir suggest that a drug could first bind to the peptide binding groove of the MHC molecule. The thereby modified HLA molecule can then be recognized by specific T-cells. Consequently, two types of reactions based on the p-i mechanism may occur: on the one hand, drugs might preferentially bind directly to the TCR, whereas in defined cases with strong HLA association, drugs might bind directly to the MHC molecule. © 2011 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.