42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intrinsically disordered proteins drive membrane curvature

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Assembly of highly curved membrane structures is essential to cellular physiology. The prevailing view has been that proteins with curvature-promoting structural motifs, such as wedge-like amphipathic helices and crescent-shaped BAR domains, are required for bending membranes. Here we report that intrinsically disordered domains of the endocytic adaptor proteins, Epsin1 and AP180 are highly potent drivers of membrane curvature. This result is unexpected since intrinsically disordered domains lack a well-defined three-dimensional structure. However, in vitro measurements of membrane curvature and protein diffusivity demonstrate that the large hydrodynamic radii of these domains generate steric pressure that drives membrane bending. When disordered adaptor domains are expressed as transmembrane cargo in mammalian cells, they are excluded from clathrin-coated pits. We propose that a balance of steric pressure on the two surfaces of the membrane drives this exclusion. These results provide quantitative evidence for the influence of steric pressure on the content and assembly of curved cellular membrane structures.

          Abstract

          Proteins that bend membranes often contain curvature-promoting structural motifs such as wedges or crescent-shaped domains. Busch et al. report that intrinsically disordered domains can also drive membrane curvature and provide evidence that steric pressure driven by protein crowding mediates this effect.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Natively unfolded nucleoporins gate protein diffusion across the nuclear pore complex.

          Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) form aqueous conduits in the nuclear envelope and gate the diffusion of large proteins between the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm. NPC proteins (nucleoporins) that contain phenylalanine-glycine motifs in filamentous, natively unfolded domains (FG domains) line the diffusion conduit of the NPC, but their role in the size-selective barrier is unclear. We show that deletion of individual FG domains in yeast relaxes the NPC permeability barrier. At the molecular level, the FG domains of five nucleoporins anchored at the NPC center form a cohesive meshwork of filaments through hydrophobic interactions, which involve phenylalanines in FG motifs and are dispersed by aliphatic alcohols. In contrast, the FG domains of four peripherally anchored nucleoporins are generally noncohesive. The results support a two-gate model of NPC architecture featuring a central diffusion gate formed by a meshwork of cohesive FG nucleoporin filaments and a peripheral gate formed by repulsive FG nucleoporin filaments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The BAR domain superfamily: membrane-molding macromolecules.

            Membrane-shaping proteins of the BAR domain superfamily are determinants of organelle biogenesis, membrane trafficking, cell division, and cell migration. An upsurge of research now reveals new principles of BAR domain-mediated membrane remodeling, enhancing our understanding of membrane curvature-mediated information processing.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Membrane bending by protein-protein crowding.

              Curved membranes are an essential feature of dynamic cellular structures, including endocytic pits, filopodia protrusions and most organelles. It has been proposed that specialized proteins induce curvature by binding to membranes through two primary mechanisms: membrane scaffolding by curved proteins or complexes; and insertion of wedge-like amphipathic helices into the membrane. Recent computational studies have raised questions about the efficiency of the helix-insertion mechanism, predicting that proteins must cover nearly 100% of the membrane surface to generate high curvature, an improbable physiological situation. Thus, at present, we lack a sufficient physical explanation of how protein attachment bends membranes efficiently. On the basis of studies of epsin1 and AP180, proteins involved in clathrin-mediated endocytosis, we propose a third general mechanism for bending fluid cellular membranes: protein-protein crowding. By correlating membrane tubulation with measurements of protein densities on membrane surfaces, we demonstrate that lateral pressure generated by collisions between bound proteins drives bending. Whether proteins attach by inserting a helix or by binding lipid heads with an engineered tag, protein coverage above ~20% is sufficient to bend membranes. Consistent with this crowding mechanism, we find that even proteins unrelated to membrane curvature, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP), can bend membranes when sufficiently concentrated. These findings demonstrate a highly efficient mechanism by which the crowded protein environment on the surface of cellular membranes can contribute to membrane shape change.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Pub. Group
                2041-1723
                24 July 2015
                2015
                : 6
                : 7875
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin , 107 W Dean Keeton, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
                [2 ]Sandia National Laboratories , 7011 East Avenue, Livermore, California 94550, USA
                [3 ]Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch , 1.224 Medical Research Building, Galveston, Texas 77555, USA
                [4 ]Department of Biochemistry and Center for Biomedical Neuroscience, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio , UTHSCSA Biochemistry 415B, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78229, USA
                [5 ]Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin , 107 W Dean, Keeton,Texas 78712, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                ncomms8875
                10.1038/ncomms8875
                4515776
                26204806
                2c0c622d-b5bc-457b-9dc7-bfbc73d4bbb9
                Copyright © 2015, Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 13 March 2015
                : 22 June 2015
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article