Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      To Stay or to Leave? Migrant Workers' Decisions During Urban Village Redevelopment in Hangzhou, China

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          As a vital source of the demographic dividend, migrant workers living in urban villages have positively contributed to urban economic development and the improvement of urbanization. Although urban villages have had a great impact on public health due to the shabby environments and poor public safety, the large-scale demolition of the urban villages, the supply of affordable housing for migrant workers has decreased drastically, which may lead to the outflow of many migrant workers and consequently affects the sustainable operations of cities. Therefore, this paper takes Hangzhou as an example to study the impact of urban village redevelopment on migrant workers and their migration decisions during urban village redevelopment process. The finding indicates that migrant workers are significantly impacted by large-scale demolition. (1) The number of affected migrant workers is huge. For example, 657,000 migrant workers who lived in around 178 urban villages are affected in Hangzhou (34,468 households). (2) The increase in rent is obvious. (3) Strong expulsion effect: nearly 1/3 migrant workers will decide to leave the city because of the demolition. Furthermore, our binary logistic regression model suggests that the commuting time, living satisfactory, and the rent affordability are factors significantly affecting migration workers' decision to leave and stay in the city. The housing quality and comfort indicators are not significant. This indicates that convenience for employment and high rent avoidance are the major characteristics of migrant workers' housing choice. Hence, in addition to considering whether the harsh environment is harmful to the public health of urban and residents, the interest and characteristics of migrant workers should be considered during the current urban village demolition process. While simply demolishing urban villages, government needs to provide a relatively sufficient amount of low-cost and affordable housing for migrant workers in case migrant workers leave the city in large numbers due to lack of suitable housing in the city.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Urban villages under China's rapid urbanization: Unregulated assets and transitional neighbourhoods

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Urbanization and Informal Development in China: Urban Villages in Shenzhen

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Informality and the Development and Demolition of Urban Villages in the Chinese Peri-urban Area

              The fate of Chinese urban villages ( chengzhongcun) has recently attracted both research and policy attention. Two important unaddressed questions are: what are the sources of informality in otherwise orderly Chinese cities; and, will village redevelopment policy eliminate informality in the Chinese city? Reflecting on the long-established study of informal settlements and recent research on informality, it is argued that the informality in China has been created by the dual urban–rural land market and land management system and by an underprovision of migrant housing. The redevelopment of chengzhongcun is an attempt to eliminate this informality and to create more governable spaces through formal land development; but since it fails to tackle the root demand for unregulated living and working space, village redevelopment only leads to the replication of informality in more remote rural villages, in other urban neighbourhoods and, to some extent, in the redeveloped neighbourhoods.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                08 November 2021
                2021
                : 9
                : 782251
                Affiliations
                School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology , Hangzhou, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Fu-Sheng Tsai, Cheng Shiu University, Taiwan

                Reviewed by: Heyuan You, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, China; Habib Nawaz Khan, University of Science and Technology Bannu, Pakistan

                *Correspondence: Tianzhou Ren rentianzhou@ 123456zjut.edu.cn

                This article was submitted to Health Economics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2021.782251
                8606570
                34820355
                2c016f9e-c19b-4c86-8475-91a86d851e79
                Copyright © 2021 Jin, Ren, Mao and Chen.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 24 September 2021
                : 15 October 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 6, Equations: 2, References: 72, Pages: 11, Words: 8823
                Funding
                Funded by: National Social Science Fund of China, doi 10.13039/501100012456;
                Award ID: 17CSH026
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research

                migrant worker,housing demolition,urban village redevelopment,migration decision,housing choice

                Comments

                Comment on this article