47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Two billion ha have been identified globally for forest restoration. Our meta-analysis encompassing 221 study landscapes worldwide reveals forest restoration enhances biodiversity by 15–84% and vegetation structure by 36–77%, compared with degraded ecosystems. For the first time, we identify the main ecological drivers of forest restoration success (defined as a return to a reference condition, that is, old-growth forest) at both the local and landscape scale. These are as follows: the time elapsed since restoration began, disturbance type and landscape context. The time elapsed since restoration began strongly drives restoration success in secondary forests, but not in selectively logged forests (which are more ecologically similar to reference systems). Landscape restoration will be most successful when previous disturbance is less intensive and habitat is less fragmented in the landscape. Restoration does not result in full recovery of biodiversity and vegetation structure, but can complement old-growth forests if there is sufficient time for ecological succession.

          Abstract

          Restoration of degraded ecosystems is known to enhance biodiversity and vegetation structure. Using a global meta-analysis, Crouzeilles et al. identify the drivers of restoration success in forest ecosystems at both the local and landscape scales.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity.

          Human-driven land-use changes increasingly threaten biodiversity, particularly in tropical forests where both species diversity and human pressures on natural environments are high. The rapid conversion of tropical forests for agriculture, timber production and other uses has generated vast, human-dominated landscapes with potentially dire consequences for tropical biodiversity. Today, few truly undisturbed tropical forests exist, whereas those degraded by repeated logging and fires, as well as secondary and plantation forests, are rapidly expanding. Here we provide a global assessment of the impact of disturbance and land conversion on biodiversity in tropical forests using a meta-analysis of 138 studies. We analysed 2,220 pairwise comparisons of biodiversity values in primary forests (with little or no human disturbance) and disturbed forests. We found that biodiversity values were substantially lower in degraded forests, but that this varied considerably by geographic region, taxonomic group, ecological metric and disturbance type. Even after partly accounting for confounding colonization and succession effects due to the composition of surrounding habitats, isolation and time since disturbance, we find that most forms of forest degradation have an overwhelmingly detrimental effect on tropical biodiversity. Our results clearly indicate that when it comes to maintaining tropical biodiversity, there is no substitute for primary forests.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis.

            Ecological restoration is widely used to reverse the environmental degradation caused by human activities. However, the effectiveness of restoration actions in increasing provision of both biodiversity and ecosystem services has not been evaluated systematically. A meta-analysis of 89 restoration assessments in a wide range of ecosystem types across the globe indicates that ecological restoration increased provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services by 44 and 25%, respectively. However, values of both remained lower in restored versus intact reference ecosystems. Increases in biodiversity and ecosystem service measures after restoration were positively correlated. Results indicate that restoration actions focused on enhancing biodiversity should support increased provision of ecosystem services, particularly in tropical terrestrial biomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group
                2041-1723
                19 May 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 11666
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratory of Vertebrates, Department of Ecology, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro 68020, Brazil
                [2 ]International Institute for Sustainability , Rio de Janeiro 22460320, Brazil
                [3 ]Rio Conservation and Sustainability Science Centre, Department of Geography and the Environment, Pontifícia Universidade Católica , Rio de Janeiro 22453900, Brazil
                [4 ]Group of Ecological Systems Design, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich , Zürich 8093, Switzerland
                [5 ]Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University , Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
                [6 ]Department of Life Sciences, Alcala University , Alcalá de Henares E-28005, Spain
                Author notes
                Article
                ncomms11666
                10.1038/ncomms11666
                4874030
                27193756
                2b3e1d5e-eeb9-4a44-9245-2d8b633b4df0
                Copyright © 2016, Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 25 August 2015
                : 18 April 2016
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article