3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Peripherally inserted central catheters versus non-tunnelled ultrasound-guided central venous catheters in newborns: a retrospective observational study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          We aimed to compare the success rates and other catheter-related parameters between peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and non-tunnelled ultrasound-guided central venous catheters (USG-CVCs) including femoral, jugular, brachiocephalic and subclavian lines.

          Design

          This was a retrospective observational study.

          Setting

          The study was performed in a level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Qatar, as a single-site study.

          Participants

          This study included 1333 neonates who required CVC insertion in the NICU from January 2016 to December 2018. Of those, we had 1264 PICCs and 69 non-tunnelled USG-CVCs.

          Outcome measures

          The success rate and other catheter-related complications in the two groups.

          Results

          The overall success rate was 88.4% in the USG-CVCs (61/69) compared with 90% in the PICCs (1137/1264) group (p=0.68). However, the first prick success rate was 69.4% in USG-CVCs (43/69) compared with 63.6% in the PICCs (796/1264) group. Leaking and central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) were significantly higher in the USG-CVC group compared with the PICC group (leaking 16.4% vs 2.3%, p=0.0001) (CLABSI 8.2% vs 3.1%, p=0.03). CLABSI rates in the PICC group were 1.75 per 1000 catheter days in 2016 and 3.3 in 2017 compared with 6.91 in 2016 (p=0.0001) and 14.32 in 2017 (p=0.0001) for the USG-CVCs. USG-CVCs had to be removed due to catheter-related complications in 52.5% of the cases compared with 29.9% in PICCs, p=0.001. In 2018, we did not have any non-tunnelled USG-CVCs insertions in our NICU.

          Conclusions

          The overall complication rate, CLABSI and leaking are significantly higher in non-tunnelled USG-CVCs compared with the PICCs. However, randomised controlled trials with larger sample sizes are desired. Proper central venous device selection and timing, early PICC insertion and early removal approach, dedicated vascular access team development, proper central venous line maintenance, central line simulation workshops and US-guided insertions are crucial elements for patient safety in NICU.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 8th Edition

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Central line complications

              Central venous access is a common procedure performed in many clinical settings for a variety of indications. Central lines are not without risk, and there are a multitude of complications that are associated with their placement. Complications can present in an immediate or delayed fashion and vary based on type of central venous access. Significant morbidity and mortality can result from complications related to central venous access. These complications can cause a significant healthcare burden in cost, hospital days, and patient quality of life. Advances in imaging, access technique, and medical devices have reduced and altered the types of complications encountered in clinical practice; but most complications still center around vascular injury, infection, and misplacement. Recognition and management of central line complications is important when caring for patients with vascular access, but prevention is the ultimate goal. This article discusses common and rare complications associated with central venous access, as well as techniques to recognize, manage, and prevent complications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2022
                6 April 2022
                : 12
                : 4
                : e058866
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentNeonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Women's Wellness and Research Center (WWRC) , Hamad Medical Corporation , Doha, Qatar
                [2 ]departmentMedical Research Center , Hamad Medical Corporation , Doha, Qatar
                [3 ]departmentMedical Education Department , Hamad Medical Corporation , Doha, Qatar
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Mohammad A A Bayoumi; moh.abdelwahab@ 123456hotmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2627-4806
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9595-0265
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2518-8161
                Article
                bmjopen-2021-058866
                10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058866
                8987782
                35387831
                2afabedc-ce5b-4994-9b53-50381648ea52
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 01 November 2021
                : 18 March 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007833, Hamad Medical Corporation;
                Award ID: MRC-01-18-151
                Categories
                Paediatrics
                1506
                1719
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                neonatology,neonatal intensive & critical care,perinatology
                Medicine
                neonatology, neonatal intensive & critical care, perinatology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content205

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors424