2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Is It Worth Publishing in a Medical Students’ Journal? Insights From a 10-Year Journey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Very little has been said about young scientists publishing in Journals that are led and carried forward by medical students or recently graduated physicians themselves. What has been said, however, is not always supportive. For some, these Journals should not exist, arguing that medical student research is for the sole purpose of training or rather, it should be aimed at reaching the level of rigor and impact held by other professional journals. For others, the lack of indexing and impact make these Journals a place where potential visibility and recognition is lost. Yet, there is a community of believers who see us as a way to improve science by training the next generation from the onset of their careers. A for-students, by-students Journal is the crossroads between publication, and therefore visibility, of student research, and a training ground for the ins and outs of peer-review and the writing standards held in science and medicine. With time, the rigor and excellence of these journals grows, and indexing follows. The future generation of physician scientists is in dire need of growth, as there are more of them retiring that there are newly graduating. 1 Medical student research is therefore a need of the whole world, and it should begin in the early stages of their careers. Yet, research curriculums in medical schools have a wide spectrum of aims, teaching techniques, and resources. This leads to vast differences in the opportunities available to students depending on where they study. The world of research and investigation fantastically breaks down these walls and engaged, motivated students learn to find their way. Student journals can be the places where these boundaries are taken down and allow students from any background and institution to mature and succeed. At the IJMS we strive to be a place for all medical students to come and join a community of student researchers aiming at excellent, publishable manuscripts. Working with medical students’ research from all over the world is inspiring. 2 Every day we receive research and experiences that connect us as a community and push the Journal towards higher levels of commitment and quality of work. The community of authors that we have seen growing steadily in the last couple of years has its repercussions in both the number of articles and issues we publish. For this ninth volume, we have increased the number of issues to four per year to better serve our community. In addition, we just went through a new expansion of our Associate and Student Editors in order to keep up with the submissions. This growth is moving use forward in our plans to be indexed. We are not yet indexed in the National Library of Medicine of the United States, but it is on the horizon for us. Being a student or recent graduate and working to keep a journal for students alive is not an easy task. There is not a class in medical school about how to be an editor or a peer-reviewer. Classically, these skills are learned on the go and through trial and error. The Journal day-to-day work, its online platform for publication, and its standards and scope truly are realized and improved every day. Our peer-review process has been normalized across the board through online courses that train students on how to review articles systematically and thoroughly. On a larger scale, the Journal is guided by organizations we apply to join (i.e., COPE) and by the guidelines we must adhere to for our publications (i.e., University of Pittsburgh Library System). At IJMS, we aim for everyone involved with the Journal, editors and authors alike, to grow and mature as young scientists with each publication and issue we have. As a young student-scientist, is it worth your time and effort to publish in a Journal for medical students? We believe so. Beyond visibility of your work in the online research world, you join a community that wants you to succeed as a researcher. You will be supporting your fellow medical students by sustaining this community. Furthermore, with time and a commitment to excellence, the IJMS will grow in its impact and indexing. We are a place of dialogue and exchange of ideas for students, and we strive for medical students’ and recently graduated physicians’ research work to always have a place in the medical scientist arena. A step away from our 10th anniversary, publishing non-stop, we celebrate this with the announcement that our aim to be indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE is stronger than ever and that the Journal is thriving in its publishing indicators. Only in the last 12 months (January 1st 2021 up to December 6th 2021), we have had 317 submissions, an acceptance rate of 19%, 123 days to acceptance since submission, and 29 days from submission to rejection. If we compare these numbers with the previous year, we had 316 submissions, an acceptance rate of 33%, 180 days from submission to acceptance, and 110 days to rejection. In addition, our next issue (Volume 10 Issue 1 of 2022) is almost ready for publication more than three months before the publication deadline. The above-mentioned goals and achievements could not have been reached without our team of Associate Editors, Student Editors, Layout Editors, Communications and Public Relationships Committee, and Editorial Board. In this Editorial, we acknowledge the members of our Editorial Team who participated the most, were permanently active in the Journal, and provided exceptional feedback or performed outstandingly in their assigned tasks: Sohaib Hasseb as the Associate Editor of the Year 2021, Adnan Mujanovic, and Joseph Tonge as the Student Editors of the Year 2021, Sajjad Ali as the Layout Editor of the Year 2021. A special acknowledgement goes to Madeleine J. Cox and Andrew Thomas who besides being excellent Student Editors are being promoted to Associate Editors. We make a special mention to Dr. Georgiana Farrugia as our outgoing Director of Communications and Public Relationship. She has done an extraordinary job in this position and our social networks status are evidence of her legacy. The International Journal of Medical Students is probably one of the few journals that requires the entire Editorial Team to be certified in the art of peer-review. Thus, all our staff has graduated from The Publons Academy, a peer-review course within the Clarivate Analytics (former Institute for Scientific Information, ISI), and has received a certified status of peer-reviewer after having evaluated two papers under the supervision of a mentor. 3 Currently, as the Publons Academy was recently integrated into the Web of Science Academy, we request our editorial team members to complete the following courses: An introduction to Peer-Review, Reviewing in the Sciences, Good Citation Behavior, and Co-reviewing with a Mentor. 4 The effort invested into the evaluation of manuscripts submitted to the IJMS certifies that we are dedicated to publishing only work of the highest quality. This issue is full of relevant research for medical students and the entire scientific community, including research on COVID-19 and other relevant topics. This last issue of 2021 revolves around seven original articles, one short communication, one case report and four experiences written by medical students from all over the world. Apart from this editorial, we reinforce our support for climate change, as discussed at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) held recently in Glasgow. Thus, we have decided to publish an editorial piece on climate change and biodiversity that begins with an interesting motto: “The Health Community Must Step Up Its Efforts to Hold Countries Accountable for Reducing Greenhouse Emissions and Promoting Adaptation”. 5 The COVID-19 pandemic remains the focus of five original research articles published in this issue, with a peculiar emphasis on the importance of mental and psychological health during these difficult times. Babatunde et al. evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on depression severity and the use of drugs among university students from Ibadan, Nigeria, reporting that symptoms of mild depression, measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), were experienced by approximately 41% of the subjects who partook in the study. Fortunately, the use of psychoactive substances was low and was not influenced by the lockdowns enforced during the pandemic. 6 Depression, anxiety, and psychological stress were fairly common in another investigation recruiting adults from India (24%, 14%, and 17%, suffered from the aforementioned ailments, respectively) as evidenced by Prakash et al. 7 Jenkins and Grasso also presented interesting data regarding the frequency (nearly 38%) of serious adverse pandemic-related experiences (e.g., increased conflict, less physical activity, frequent substance use) in a sample of medical students from the United States of America. Students who spent more time caring for patients diagnosed with the SARS-COV-2 infection were more likely to deal with such psychological distress and to suffer from anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. 8 Odeyemi et al. explored the knowledge, attitude, and practices towards the preventive strategies against the COVID-19 pandemic among young adults from Nigeria. The researchers revealed that there is optimism that the pandemic will eventually be controlled; however, the use of face masks by the respondents was influenced by their level of education, ethnicity, and other factors. 9 Ethnicity was also related to the risk of acquiring COVID-19 in a sample of nearly 2,000 adults from the United States. Hispanics were more likely to test positive for SARSCOV-2 and this relationship was mediated by social determinants of health risk factors, as reported by Verdini et al. 10 Furthermore, due to the importance of involving any available healthcare worker in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, Bernard et al. proposed a pandemic leadership model for medical students based on several overarching themes, namely Communication, Other-Orientation, Personal Characteristics, Decisive Action, and Use of Information. 11 The second half of the issue is more focused on medical students and education. Zeller et al. prospectively compared pocket-sized ultrasound and cardiac auscultation in diagnosing cardiac valve pathologies by medical students, revealing that training in the former technique improves their ability to identify heart valve disorders. 12 Silver et al. implemented a series of storytelling events on the topic of formative medical experiences in order to combat burnout and promote mindfulness and wellness which benefited all participants, but in particular medical students. 13 In their case presentation, Mohamed et al. pointed out that the use of ring pessaries, a conservative approach method employed in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, may results in a severe but rare complication, i.e., rectovaginal fistula. 14 The four experience pieces of the issue span a variety of relevant topics in the career of any healthcare professional: gender bias, gender equity and the prevalence of stereotypes in clinical medicine and surgery, volunteering in times of war, and health promotion using medical education. 15–18 We move into the New Year with high expectations and hope to keep this Journal flourishing and growing. We wish everyone in the community Happy Holidays. We resolve to continue growing the Journal, and we look forward to you joining us in this adventure. Cheers!

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Maintaining a Robust Pipeline of Future Physician-Scientists

          A perspective on how training programs can improve our pipeline of future physician-scientists is presented. Perhaps the most dramatic finding in the 2014 National Institutes of Health Physician-Scientist Workforce Working Group Report is the aging of the physician-scientist workforce. There are currently 1.6-fold more physician-scientists over the age of 61 than under the age of 50, indicating that our pipeline of physician-scientists is insufficient to maintain current numbers. Several factors likely contribute to this leaky pipeline, including the long training periods, poor compensation during training, diminished funding odds for young investigators, and lack of role models, particularly for women and underrepresented minorities. This perspective will present several ideas for how training programs can play a role in assuring a robust pipeline of future physician scientists.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            COP26 and Health: Some Progress, But Too Slow and Not Enough: The Health Community Must Step Up Its Efforts to Hold Countries Accountable for Reducing Greenhouse Emissions and Promoting Adaptation

            The editorial on climate change and biodiversity published in over 220 health journals in September had two main demands: keep global temperature increases below 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels to avoid catastrophic damage to health; and accept that this can be achieved only by rich countries making bigger cuts in greenhouse gas emissions and transferring substantial resources to the countries’ most vulnerable the effects of climate change.1 Neither demand was fully met at COP26 in Glasgow. The editorial was also aiming to make the voice of the health community more prominent in global discussions on climate change and environmental destruction. Some progress was made with this aim, but again not enough.   Although the mantra of COP26 was “keep 1.5°C alive,” the pledges made by countries to reduce emissions are insufficient to keep the temperature rise to below 1.5°C. Before COP26, the United Nations estimated that current pledges will lead to an increase of 2.7°C, a level that would lead to devastating effects on health through extreme weather events, crop failure, water shortages, forced migration, conflict, and a rise in sea level that will mean the disappearance of some island countries.2 Even with the additional pledges made at COP26, temperatures are expected to rise well above 2°C.3 We must encourage countries to be bolder in cutting emissions, promoting adaptation, supporting vulnerable countries – and do more to hold them to account. We must also concentrate on implementation, particularly within health systems where we have most influence.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              To stay at port or to go to sea: Are clinical clerkships a double-edged sword during the COVID-19 pandemic? Where do we go from here?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101778633
                51168
                Int J Med Stud
                Int J Med Stud
                International journal of medical students
                2076-6327
                8 May 2022
                2021
                16 December 2021
                13 May 2022
                : 9
                : 4
                : 252-254
                Affiliations
                [1 ]MD, MSc, PhD(c). University of Pittsburgh, Instituto for Clinical Research Education, Department of Ophthalmology, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Science to Serve the Community, SCISCO Foundation / Fundación SCISCO, Colombia. Service of Ophthalmology, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia. Editor in Chief, International Journal of Medical Students, IJMS
                [2 ]Medical Student, Humanitas University, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy. Deputy Editor, IJMS
                [3 ]MD, PhD student. “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania. Department of Hematology, Center of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania. Scientific Editor, IJMS
                Author notes

                Author Contributions

                Writing - Original Draft Preparation & Writing - Review & Editing: FJBE, CE, M-AG.

                Correspondence: Francisco J. Bonilla-Escobar, Address: 1400 Locust St, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States, editor.in.chief@ 123456ijms.info
                Article
                NIHMS1802265
                10.5195/ijms.2021.1309
                9105116
                35571605
                2af1cd03-e0d2-43fe-89b4-3f0ac7beac13

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article