2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Access in all areas? A round up of developments in market access and health technology assessment: part 1

      discussion

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this new series reviewing recent developments in market access, we highlight publications investigating health technology assessment (HTA) guidance, review processes and outcomes across the world and discuss how forthcoming changes in the HTA and regulatory environment in the European Union may allow for more consistency in decision making.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Defining Elements of Value in Health Care—A Health Economics Approach: An ISPOR Special Task Force Report [3]

          The third section of our Special Task Force report identifies and defines a series of elements that warrant consideration in value assessments of medical technologies. We aim to broaden the view of what constitutes value in health care and to spur new research on incorporating additional elements of value into cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). Twelve potential elements of value are considered. Four of them-quality-adjusted life-years, net costs, productivity, and adherence-improving factors-are conventionally included or considered in value assessments. Eight others, which would be more novel in economic assessments, are defined and discussed: reduction in uncertainty, fear of contagion, insurance value, severity of disease, value of hope, real option value, equity, and scientific spillovers. Most of these are theoretically well understood and available for inclusion in value assessments. The two exceptions are equity and scientific spillover effects, which require more theoretical development and consensus. A number of regulatory authorities around the globe have shown interest in some of these novel elements. Augmenting CEA to consider these additional elements would result in a more comprehensive CEA in line with the "impact inventory" of the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Possible approaches for valuation and inclusion of these elements include integrating them as part of a net monetary benefit calculation, including elements as attributes in health state descriptions, or using them as criteria in a multicriteria decision analysis. Further research is needed on how best to measure and include them in decision making.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            What is driving HTA decision-making? Evidence from cancer drug reimbursement decisions from 6 European countries.

            Decisions on the reimbursement of the same cancer drugs are different across European countries, but empirical work on the reasons behind these differences has been scarce. The main objective of this paper is to make a methodological contribution to existing research, specifically by outlining the systematic process of analysis to address such questions and determining the factors that might lead to different drug reimbursement decisions, and to explore its application in the field of oncology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Health technology assessment for cancer medicines across the G7 countries and Oceania: an international, cross-sectional study

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Comp Eff Res
                J Comp Eff Res
                CER
                Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
                Becaris Publishing Ltd (Royston, UK )
                2042-6305
                2042-6313
                16 August 2023
                October 2023
                16 August 2023
                : 12
                : 10
                : e230129
                Affiliations
                [1 ]MSD Innovation & Development, Zurich, 8058, Switzerland
                [2 ]Lane Clark & Peacock, London, W1U 1DQ, UK
                [3 ]BeiGene, London, EC4A 4AB, UK
                [4 ]Centre for Pharmaceutical Medicine Research, King's College London, SE1 9NH, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Author for correspondence: sreeram.ramagopalan@ 123456lcp.uk.com
                Article
                10.57264/cer-2023-0129
                10690433
                37584405
                2aed0f70-30ef-4a53-88d0-0728e8aee8c5
                © 2023 The Authors

                This work is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Unported License

                History
                : 10 July 2023
                : 03 August 2023
                : 16 August 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 3
                Categories
                Industry Update

                decision making,european union,health technology assessment,joint clinical assessment,market access,regulatory

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content67

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors42