70
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A standardised staticin vitrodigestion method suitable for food – an international consensus

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 14 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 14 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 14 , 13 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 10 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 41 , 44 , 45 , 13 , 46 , 21 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 14 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 53 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 1 , 2 ,   1 , 2
      Food Funct.
      Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The paper presents an international consensus for a standardised static in vitrodigestion method for food.

          Abstract

          Simulated gastro-intestinal digestion is widely employed in many fields of food and nutritional sciences, as conducting human trials are often costly, resource intensive, and ethically disputable. As a consequence, in vitroalternatives that determine endpoints such as the bioaccessibility of nutrients and non-nutrients or the digestibility of macronutrients (e.g. lipids, proteins and carbohydrates) are used for screening and building new hypotheses. Various digestion models have been proposed, often impeding the possibility to compare results across research teams. For example, a large variety of enzymes from different sources such as of porcine, rabbit or human origin have been used, differing in their activity and characterization. Differences in pH, mineral type, ionic strength and digestion time, which alter enzyme activity and other phenomena, may also considerably alter results. Other parameters such as the presence of phospholipids, individual enzymes such as gastric lipase and digestive emulsifiers vs.their mixtures ( e.g.pancreatin and bile salts), and the ratio of food bolus to digestive fluids, have also been discussed at length. In the present consensus paper, within the COST Infogest network, we propose a general standardised and practical static digestion method based on physiologically relevant conditions that can be applied for various endpoints, which may be amended to accommodate further specific requirements. A frameset of parameters including the oral, gastric and small intestinal digestion are outlined and their relevance discussed in relation to available in vivodata and enzymes. This consensus paper will give a detailed protocol and a line-by-line, guidance, recommendations and justifications but also limitation of the proposed model. This harmonised static, in vitrodigestion method for food should aid the production of more comparable data in the future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references74

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          THE ESTIMATION OF PEPSIN, TRYPSIN, PAPAIN, AND CATHEPSIN WITH HEMOGLOBIN

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            In vitro human digestion models for food applications

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Total phenolics, flavonoids, anthocyanins and antioxidant activity following simulated gastro-intestinal digestion and dialysis of apple varieties: Bioaccessibility and potential uptake.

              In the present study, an in vitro model simulating gastrointestinal (GI) digestion, including dialysability, was adapted to assess free soluble polyphenols from apples (four varieties). Results indicated that polyphenol release was mainly achieved during the gastric phase (ca. 65% of phenolics and flavonoids), with a slight further release (<10%) during intestinal digestion. Anthocyanins present after the gastric phase (1.04-1.14mg/100g) were not detectable following intestinal digestion. Dialysis experiments employing a semipermeable cellulose membrane, presenting a simplified model of the epithelial barrier, showed that free soluble dialysable polyphenols and flavonoids were 55% and 44% of native concentrations, respectively, being approximately 20% and 30% lower than that of the GI digesta. Similar results were found for the antioxidant capacity of dialysable antioxidants, being 57% and 46% lower compared to total antioxidants in fresh apples (FRAP and ABTS test, respectively). It is suggested that some polyphenols are bound to macromolecular compounds that are non-dialysable, that the presented method allowed the study of free soluble polyphenols available for further uptake, and that both chemical extraction and concentrations in final digesta would overestimate polyphenol availability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                FFOUAI
                Food Funct.
                Food Funct.
                Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
                2042-6496
                2042-650X
                2014
                2014
                : 5
                : 6
                : 1113-1124
                Affiliations
                [1 ]TNO
                [2 ]3700AJ Zeist, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Chalmers University of Technology
                [4 ]Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering
                [5 ]SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
                [6 ]National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge, I.P.
                [7 ]Food and Nutrition Department
                [8 ]1649-016 Lisboa, Portugal
                [9 ]Nofima AS
                [10 ]NO-1430 Ås, Norway
                [11 ]Centre de Recherche Public - Gabriel Lippmann
                [12 ]4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg
                [13 ]INRA
                [14 ]UMR1253 Science et Technologie du Lait et de l’Oeuf
                [15 ]F-35042 Rennes, France
                [16 ]AGROCAMPUS OUEST
                [17 ]CNRS-Aix Marseille University
                [18 ]UMR7282
                [19 ]F-13402 Marseilles Cedex 20, France
                [20 ]University of Guelph
                [21 ]Department of Food Science
                [22 ]Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
                [23 ]UMR SQPOV
                [24 ]Avignon Cedex 9, France
                [25 ]Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP
                [26 ]CH-3003 Berne, Switzerland
                [27 ]Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health
                [28 ]Riddet Institute
                [29 ]Massey University
                [30 ]Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
                [31 ]Ege University
                [32 ]Engineering Faculty Department of Food Engineering
                [33 ]35100 Izmir, Turkey
                [34 ]Nofima
                [35 ]INRA AgroParisTech
                [36 ]UMR GMPA 782
                [37 ]78850 Thiverval grignon, France
                [38 ]Department of Biotechnology and Food Engineering,
                [39 ]Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
                [40 ]Haifa 32000, Israel
                [41 ]Institute of Food Research
                [42 ]Norwich Research Park
                [43 ]NR4 7UA Norwich, UK
                [44 ]Norwich, UK
                [45 ]UR1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages
                [46 ]Nantes, France
                [47 ]University of Massachusetts
                [48 ]Chenoweth Lab.
                [49 ]Amherst, USA
                [50 ]Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL, CSIC-UAM)
                [51 ]28049 Madrid, Spain
                [52 ]Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica
                [53 ]2781-901 Oeiras, Portugal
                [54 ]Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica
                [55 ]Universidade Nova de Lisboa
                [56 ]Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering
                [57 ]Department of Food Science and Technology
                [58 ]University of California
                [59 ]Davis, USA
                [60 ]Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science
                [61 ]Norwegian University of Life Sciences
                [62 ]1432 Aas, Norway
                [63 ]Leatherhead Food Research
                [64 ]Surrey KT22 7RY, UK
                Article
                10.1039/C3FO60702J
                24803111
                2ac5f3e1-c1f8-4995-96a8-165a114491e6
                © 2014
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article