10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Relationship Between Extroversion and the Tendency to Anthropomorphize Robots: A Bayesian Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Personality variables play an important role in how individuals relate to the world around them, including how they view their peers. Such peers now include machine entities, such as robots. This study examined the relationship between the personality trait of extroversion and the tendency to view a robot as anthropomorphic in an experimental setting. To evaluate this relationship, 486 participants were required to complete measures of the big five personality traits (The Mini IPIP) and Negative Attitudes to Robots Scale (NARS). Participants then viewed videos and images of robots performing common jobs (i.e., warehouse technician, IED detection), and then rated these robots via an assessment instrument scaling anthropomorphism. A significant positive relationship between extroversion and the tendency toward anthropomorphization of the robots was found. A Bayesian regression analysis was performed, which indicated the strength of extroversion as a predictor of the tendency to anthropomorphize. We conclude that personality dimensions influence how an individual views the robot that they interact with. These findings are important, as the relationship between personality and the tendency to anthropomorphize robots is likely to influence the acceptance and use of robots.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.

          Anthropomorphism describes the tendency to imbue the real or imagined behavior of nonhuman agents with humanlike characteristics, motivations, intentions, or emotions. Although surprisingly common, anthropomorphism is not invariant. This article describes a theory to explain when people are likely to anthropomorphize and when they are not, focused on three psychological determinants--the accessibility and applicability of anthropocentric knowledge (elicited agent knowledge), the motivation to explain and understand the behavior of other agents (effectance motivation), and the desire for social contact and affiliation (sociality motivation). This theory predicts that people are more likely to anthropomorphize when anthropocentric knowledge is accessible and applicable, when motivated to be effective social agents, and when lacking a sense of social connection to other humans. These factors help to explain why anthropomorphism is so variable; organize diverse research; and offer testable predictions about dispositional, situational, developmental, and cultural influences on anthropomorphism. Discussion addresses extensions of this theory into the specific psychological processes underlying anthropomorphism, applications of this theory into robotics and human-computer interaction, and the insights offered by this theory into the inverse process of dehumanization. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Robot AI
                Front Robot AI
                Front. Robot. AI
                Frontiers in Robotics and AI
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-9144
                09 January 2019
                2018
                : 5
                : 135
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Minds in Technology/Machines in Thought Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL, United States
                [2] 2MITRE , Washington, DC, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Séverin Lemaignan, Bristol Robotics Laboratory, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Thierry Chaminade, Center for the National Scientific Research (CNRS), France; Sean Andrist, Microsoft Research, United States

                *Correspondence: Alexandra D. Kaplan adkaplan@ 123456knights.ucf.edu

                This article was submitted to Human-Robot Interaction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Robotics and AI

                Article
                10.3389/frobt.2018.00135
                7805749
                33501013
                2a7b3a66-6e74-4e01-891f-d6d029bfacfb
                Copyright © 2019 Kaplan, Sanders and Hancock.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 25 September 2018
                : 07 December 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Equations: 2, References: 19, Pages: 9, Words: 6630
                Categories
                Robotics and AI
                Original Research

                extroversion,anthropomorphism,anthropomorphization,human-robot interaction,individual differences

                Comments

                Comment on this article