Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The big business of sustainable food production and consumption: Exploring the transition to alternative proteins

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Animal agriculture is responsible for considerable environmental burden, and a key contributor to climate change. Meat alternatives are increasingly understood as potential solutions to decreasing this burden by enabling a shift away from conventional models of production and consumption of animal-derived foods. This paper explores the progress, drivers, and barriers of change by examining the development and diffusion of four key technologies used to produce “alternative protein” products. Recent developments are shown to be consistent with an emerging sustainability transition, particularly the increased engagement with alternative proteins by large food corporates. However, political, regulatory, and cultural barriers remain, and are more pronounced for some alternative protein technologies than others, affecting prospects for the progression of a transformational “protein transition.”

          Abstract

          A widespread sense of the unsustainability of the food system has taken hold in recent years, leading to calls for fundamental change. The role of animal agriculture is central to many of these debates, leading to interest in the possibility of a “protein transition,” whereby the production and consumption of animal-derived foods is replaced with plant-based substitutes or “alternative proteins.” Despite the potential sustainability implications of this transition, the developmental trajectories and transformative potential of the associated technologies remain underexplored. This article sheds light on these dynamics by addressing two questions: 1) how have alternative protein innovations developed over the past three decades, and 2) what explains their more recent acceleration? To answer these questions, the article makes an empirical analysis of four alternative protein innovations, and the partial destabilization of the animal agriculture system between 1990 and 2021, guided by the multi-level perspective. The analysis highlights an intensification in corporate engagement with alternative protein development and diffusion. This intensification is judged to be consistent with the beginnings of a wider corporate reorientation, occurring alongside a rise in pressures on the animal agriculture system, notably an increasing scientific consensus and societal awareness of the links between climate change and meat-intensive diets. The paper demonstrates how differences in technological maturity across the niche innovations have resulted in potentially transformative pressures, which are consistent with an emerging sustainability transition, manifesting differently in terms of the extent of diffusion of the alternative protein niches.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers

            Food's environmental impacts are created by millions of diverse producers. To identify solutions that are effective under this heterogeneity, we consolidated data covering five environmental indicators; 38,700 farms; and 1600 processors, packaging types, and retailers. Impact can vary 50-fold among producers of the same product, creating substantial mitigation opportunities. However, mitigation is complicated by trade-offs, multiple ways for producers to achieve low impacts, and interactions throughout the supply chain. Producers have limits on how far they can reduce impacts. Most strikingly, impacts of the lowest-impact animal products typically exceed those of vegetable substitutes, providing new evidence for the importance of dietary change. Cumulatively, our findings support an approach where producers monitor their own impacts, flexibly meet environmental targets by choosing from multiple practices, and communicate their impacts to consumers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                13 November 2023
                21 November 2023
                13 November 2023
                : 120
                : 47
                : e2207782120
                Affiliations
                [1] aSustainable Consumption Institute, University of Manchester , Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
                [2] bInstitute of Innovation Research, University of Manchester , Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
                [3] cCountryside and Community Research Institute, University of Gloucestershire , Cheltenham GL50 4AZ, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: josephine.mylan@ 123456manchester.ac.uk .

                Edited by Florian Kern, Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin, Germany; received May 5, 2022; accepted January 10, 2023 by Editorial Board Member William C. Clark

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8369-4938
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4459-6630
                Article
                202207782
                10.1073/pnas.2207782120
                10666110
                37956280
                2a6870bb-c19f-420a-9b63-7a83bc729eda
                Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                : 05 May 2022
                : 10 January 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 9, Words: 7357
                Categories
                551, Special Feature: Sustainability transitions in consumption-production systems
                research-article, Research Article
                soc-sci, Social Sciences
                432
                551
                Social Sciences
                Social Sciences
                Sustainability transitions in consumption-production systems
                Custom metadata
                free

                alternative proteins,animal agriculture,sustainability transition,food systems innovation

                Comments

                Comment on this article