6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Meta‐analysis

      1 , 1 , 1 , 1
      Head & Neck
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We investigated the prognostic impact of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We systematically searched electronic databases and identified articles reporting an association between NLR and treatment results in patients with HNSCC treated with ICIs. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and odds ratios (ORs) for response and disease control were extracted. Pooled HRs and ORs were estimated using random-effects models. Fourteen studies involving 929 patients were included. A higher NLR was associated with poor OS (HR 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50-2.74), PFS (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.44-3.21), response (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.93), and disease control (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.74). The NLR predicts treatment results with ICIs in patients with HNSCC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Meta-analysis in clinical trials

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

            Matthew Page and co-authors describe PRISMA 2020, an updated reporting guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

              Background Patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck after platinum chemotherapy have a very poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Nivolumab, an anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, was assessed as treatment for this condition. Methods In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, 361 patients with recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck whose disease had progressed within 6 months after platinum-based chemotherapy to receive nivolumab (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight) every 2 weeks or standard, single-agent systemic therapy (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab). The primary end point was overall survival. Additional end points included progression-free survival, rate of objective response, safety, and patient-reported quality of life. Results The median overall survival was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5 to 9.1) in the nivolumab group versus 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 6.0) in the group that received standard therapy. Overall survival was significantly longer with nivolumab than with standard therapy (hazard ratio for death, 0.70; 97.73% CI, 0.51 to 0.96; P=0.01), and the estimates of the 1-year survival rate were approximately 19 percentage points higher with nivolumab than with standard therapy (36.0% vs. 16.6%). The median progression-free survival was 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.1) with nivolumab versus 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.1) with standard therapy (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.13; P=0.32). The rate of progression-free survival at 6 months was 19.7% with nivolumab versus 9.9% with standard therapy. The response rate was 13.3% in the nivolumab group versus 5.8% in the standard-therapy group. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 13.1% of the patients in the nivolumab group versus 35.1% of those in the standard-therapy group. Physical, role, and social functioning was stable in the nivolumab group, whereas it was meaningfully worse in the standard-therapy group. Conclusions Among patients with platinum-refractory, recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck, treatment with nivolumab resulted in longer overall survival than treatment with standard, single-agent therapy. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 141 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02105636 .).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Head & Neck
                Head & Neck
                Wiley
                1043-3074
                1097-0347
                May 2022
                February 10 2022
                May 2022
                : 44
                : 5
                : 1237-1245
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
                Article
                10.1002/hed.26997
                35146824
                2a194948-4472-48a5-a5ec-67536b8a38ac
                © 2022

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article