24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Quality and readability of English-language Internet information for vestibular disorders

      research-article
      a , d , * , a , b , a , a , c
      Journal of Vestibular Research
      IOS Press
      Vestibular disorders, internet health information, health information quality , health information readability

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND:

          The Internet has become a powerful, accessible resource for many patients to use for their own medical management and knowledge. Vestibular disorders are prevalent, especially in the elderly. As the Internet is increasingly a major source of health-related information to the general public, it is often used to search for information regarding dizziness and vertigo. Ensuring that the information is accessible, unbiased, and appropriate can aid informed decision-making.

          OBJECTIVE:

          To evaluate the quality and readability of English-language Internet information related to vestibular disorders.

          METHODS:

          A cross-sectional website search using three keywords (nausea, dizziness, and vertigo) in five country-specific versions of the most commonly used Internet search engine was conducted in March 2018. The language was limited to English for all websites. Quality was assessed by presence of Health on the Net (HON) certification and DISCERN scores. Readability was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Formula (F-KGL), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG).

          RESULTS:

          In total, 112 websites were included and analyzed. The majority were commercial (61%) websites. A total of 42% had obtained HON certification. No association was found between the presence of HON certification and the resource of the website. The DISCERN scores had a mean of 2.52 (SD 1.1). Readability measures indicated that an average of 14–18 years of education was required to read and understand the Internet information provided regarding vestibular disorders.

          CONCLUSIONS:

          To ensure the accessible to the general population, it is necessary to improve the quality and readability of Internet-based information regarding vestibular disorders.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.

          To develop a short instrument, called DISCERN, which will enable patients and information providers to judge the quality of written information about treatment choices. DISCERN will also facilitate the production of new, high quality, evidence-based consumer health information. An expert panel, representing a range of expertise in consumer health information, generated criteria from a random sample of information for three medical conditions with varying degrees of evidence: myocardial infarction, endometriosis, and chronic fatigue syndrome. A graft instrument, based on this analysis, was tested by the panel on a random sample of new material for the same three conditions. The panel re-drafted the instrument to take account of the results of the test. The DISCERN instrument was finally tested by a national sample of 15 information providers and 13 self help group members on a random sample of leaflets from 19 major national self help organisations. Participants also completed an 8 item questionnaire concerning the face and content validity of the instrument. Chance corrected agreement (weighted kappa) for the overall quality rating was kappa = 0.53 (95% CI kappa = 0.48 to kappa = 0.59) among the expert panel, kappa = 0.40 (95% CI kappa = 0.36 to kappa = 0.43) among information providers, and kappa = 0.23 (95% CI kappa = 0.19 to kappa = 0.27) among self help group members. Higher agreement levels were associated with experience of using the instrument and with professional knowledge of consumer health information. Levels of agreement varied across individual items on the instrument, reflecting the need for subjectivity in rating certain criteria. The trends in levels of agreement were similar among all groups. The final instrument consisted of 15 questions plus an overall quality rating. Responses to the questionnaire after the final testing revealed the instrument to have good face and content validity and to be generally applicable. DISCERN is a reliable and valid instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information. While some subjectivity is required for rating certain criteria, the findings demonstrate that the instrument can be applied by experienced users and providers of health information to discriminate between publications of high and low quality. The instrument will also be of benefit to patients, though its use will be improved by training.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A new readability yardstick.

            R FLESCH (1948)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

              Background Many systematic reviews exist on the use of remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions to improve clinical outcomes and psychological well-being of patients with heart failure. However, research is broadly distributed from simple telephone-based to complex technology-based interventions. The scope and focus of such evidence also vary widely, creating challenges for clinicians who seek information on the effect of RPM interventions. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of RPM interventions on the health outcomes of patients with heart failure by synthesizing review-level evidence. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2015. We screened reviews based on relevance to RPM interventions using criteria developed for this overview. Independent authors screened, selected, and extracted information from systematic reviews. AMSTAR (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) was used to assess the methodological quality of individual reviews. We used standardized language to summarize results across reviews and to provide final statements about intervention effectiveness. Results A total of 19 systematic reviews met our inclusion criteria. Reviews consisted of RPM with diverse interventions such as telemonitoring, home telehealth, mobile phone–based monitoring, and videoconferencing. All-cause mortality and heart failure mortality were the most frequently reported outcomes, but others such as quality of life, rehospitalization, emergency department visits, and length of stay were also reported. Self-care and knowledge were less commonly identified. Conclusions Telemonitoring and home telehealth appear generally effective in reducing heart failure rehospitalization and mortality. Other interventions, including the use of mobile phone–based monitoring and videoconferencing, require further investigation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Vestib Res
                J Vestib Res
                VES
                Journal of Vestibular Research
                IOS Press (Nieuwe Hemweg 6B, 1013 BG Amsterdam, The Netherlands )
                0957-4271
                1878-6464
                22 April 2020
                18 May 2020
                2020
                : 30
                : 2
                : 63-72
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University , Beaumont, TX, USA
                [b ]Department of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University , Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [c ]Department of Speech and Hearing, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal University , Manipal, Karnataka, India
                [d ]Department of Speech and Hearing, Fluminense Federal University , Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: Dr. Lilian Felipe, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas, 77710, USA. Tel.: +1 09 880 7900; Fax: +1 409 880 2265; E-mail: lfelipe@ 123456lamar.edu .
                Article
                VES200698
                10.3233/VES-200698
                9249283
                32333571
                2934b4d0-e6a1-4de6-90cc-763064821f2b
                © 2020 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 November 2018
                : 19 March 2020
                Categories
                Research Article

                vestibular disorders,internet health information,health information quality,health information readability

                Comments

                Comment on this article