2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How often are ecosystems top‐down controlled? Experiments in grassland, grasshopper, and bird systems over time and space

      research-article
      1 , , 1
      Ecosphere (Washington, D.c)
      John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
      birds, grasshoppers, plants, spiders, trophic systems

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ecosystems are frequently considered to be controlled by predation (top‐down). Experiments examined this in four bird/spider/grasshopper/prairie habitats over 34 years, employing in each habitat three 100 m 2 bird exclosures and controls (121 habitat/year cases) where plant, grasshopper, and spider abundances were measured. Top‐down control (plants decrease and grasshoppers increase with bird exclusion) was observed in only 13.2% of cases, while plants increased and grasshoppers decreased in 33.1% of cases, plants decreased and grasshoppers decreased in 25.6% of cases, and plants increased and grasshoppers increased in 28.1% of cases. Therefore, top‐down control was not common and system responses were not constant, but varied among sites, years, and directionally over time with climate change. This diversity of responses is expected given the variety of underlying processes in complex ecosystems. For example, decision tree/discriminant analysis found that plant decreases and increases with bird exclusion were correctly identified in 78.3% of cases by grasshopper hatchling abundance, plant cover, and annual net primary production (ANPP), while grasshopper decreases and increases with bird exclusion were correctly identified in 76.7% of cases by edible plant biomass per grasshopper hatchling, grasshopper hatchling abundance, and large grasshopper abundance. Analysis of other system‐wide terrestrial trophic experiments indicates that the variety of responses observed by us over time and space may be common so that system‐wide trophic responses may, in general, be more variable than either top‐down or bottom‐up as often considered.

          Related collections

          Most cited references134

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Predation, Body Size, and Composition of Plankton.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Cascading Trophic Interactions and Lake Productivity

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation.

              There is growing recognition of the important roles played by predators in regulating ecosystems and sustaining biodiversity. Much attention has focused on the consequences of predator-regulation of herbivore populations, and associated trophic cascades. However apex predators may also control smaller 'mesopredators' through intraguild interactions. Removal of apex predators can result in changes to intraguild interactions and outbreaks of mesopredators ('mesopredator release'), leading in turn to increased predation on smaller prey. Here we provide a review and synthesis of studies of predator interactions, mesopredator release and their impacts on biodiversity. Mesopredator suppression by apex predators is widespread geographically and taxonomically. Apex predators suppress mesopredators both by killing them, or instilling fear, which motivates changes in behaviour and habitat use that limit mesopredator distribution and abundance. Changes in the abundance of apex predators may have disproportionate (up to fourfold) effects on mesopredator abundance. Outcomes of interactions between predators may however vary with resource availability, habitat complexity and the complexity of predator communities. There is potential for the restoration of apex predators to have benefits for biodiversity conservation through moderation of the impacts of mesopredators on their prey, but this requires a whole-ecosystem view to avoid unforeseen negative effects. 'Nothing has changed since I began. My eye has permitted no change. I am going to keep things like this.' From 'Hawk Roosting', by Ted Hughes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                belovsky.1@nd.edu
                Journal
                Ecosphere
                Ecosphere
                10.1002/(ISSN)2150-8925
                ECS2
                Ecosphere (Washington, D.c)
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                2150-8925
                21 November 2024
                November 2024
                : 15
                : 11 ( doiID: 10.1002/ecs2.v15.11 )
                : e70066
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Biological Sciences University of Notre Dame Notre Dame Indiana USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Gary E. Belovsky

                Email: belovsky.1@ 123456nd.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4242-697X
                Article
                ECS270066
                10.1002/ecs2.70066
                11583287
                39583755
                29201d36-25ec-4835-8a82-562a875aa576
                © 2024 The Author(s). Ecosphere published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 September 2024
                : 21 March 2024
                : 18 September 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Pages: 15, Words: 10200
                Funding
                Funded by: United States Department of Agriculture/Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension/National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program (USDA/CSREES/NRICGP) , doi 10.13039/100000199;
                Award ID: 00‐35101‐9267
                Funded by: NSF
                Award ID: BSR‐83‐07352
                Award ID: DEB‐04‐15390
                Award ID: DEB‐09‐18306
                Award ID: DEB‐78‐02069
                Award ID: DEB‐93‐17984
                Award ID: DEB‐97‐07564
                Funded by: United States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service (USDA/ARS) , doi 10.13039/100000199;
                Award ID: 58‐5436‐9‐152
                Funded by: USDA , doi 10.13039/100000199;
                Funded by: National Geographic Society , doi 10.13039/100006363;
                Funded by: Utah State University Agricultural Experiment Station , doi 10.13039/100007199;
                Award ID: 1992‐1996
                Funded by: Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan, University of Michigan Vice‐President for Research Grant
                Award ID: 1989–1994
                Funded by: United States Department of Agriculture/Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service/Grasshopper Integrated Pest Management (USDA/APHIS/GHIPM) , doi 10.13039/100000199;
                Categories
                Article
                Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                November 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.5.1 mode:remove_FC converted:21.11.2024

                birds,grasshoppers,plants,spiders,trophic systems
                birds, grasshoppers, plants, spiders, trophic systems

                Comments

                Comment on this article