9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sexually dimorphic radiogenomic models identify distinct imaging and biological pathways that are prognostic of overall survival in glioblastoma

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Recent epidemiological studies have suggested that sexual dimorphism influences treatment response and prognostic outcome in glioblastoma (GBM). To this end, we sought to (i) identify distinct sex-specific radiomic phenotypes—from tumor subcompartments (peritumoral edema, enhancing tumor, and necrotic core) using pretreatment MRI scans—that are prognostic of overall survival (OS) in GBMs, and (ii) investigate radiogenomic associations of the MRI-based phenotypes with corresponding transcriptomic data, to identify the signaling pathways that drive sex-specific tumor biology and treatment response in GBM.

          Methods

          In a retrospective setting, 313 GBM patients (male = 196, female = 117) were curated from multiple institutions for radiomic analysis, where 130 were used for training and independently validated on a cohort of 183 patients. For the radiogenomic analysis, 147 GBM patients (male = 94, female = 53) were used, with 125 patients in training and 22 cases for independent validation.

          Results

          Cox regression models of radiomic features from gadolinium T1-weighted MRI allowed for developing more precise prognostic models, when trained separately on male and female cohorts. Our radiogenomic analysis revealed higher expression of Laws energy features that capture spots and ripple-like patterns (representative of increased heterogeneity) from the enhancing tumor region, as well as aggressive biological processes of cell adhesion and angiogenesis to be more enriched in the “high-risk” group of poor OS in the male population. In contrast, higher expressions of Laws energy features (which detect levels and edges) from the necrotic core with significant involvement of immune related signaling pathways was observed in the “low-risk” group of the female population.

          Conclusions

          Sexually dimorphic radiogenomic models could help risk-stratify GBM patients for personalized treatment decisions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology

            Genomic sequencing has made it clear that a large fraction of the genes specifying the core biological functions are shared by all eukaryotes. Knowledge of the biological role of such shared proteins in one organism can often be transferred to other organisms. The goal of the Gene Ontology Consortium is to produce a dynamic, controlled vocabulary that can be applied to all eukaryotes even as knowledge of gene and protein roles in cells is accumulating and changing. To this end, three independent ontologies accessible on the World-Wide Web (http://www.geneontology.org) are being constructed: biological process, molecular function and cellular component.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.

              The National Institutes of Health have placed significant emphasis on sharing of research data to support secondary research. Investigators have been encouraged to publish their clinical and imaging data as part of fulfilling their grant obligations. Realizing it was not sufficient to merely ask investigators to publish their collection of imaging and clinical data, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) created the open source National Biomedical Image Archive software package as a mechanism for centralized hosting of cancer related imaging. NCI has contracted with Washington University in Saint Louis to create The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA)-an open-source, open-access information resource to support research, development, and educational initiatives utilizing advanced medical imaging of cancer. In its first year of operation, TCIA accumulated 23 collections (3.3 million images). Operating and maintaining a high-availability image archive is a complex challenge involving varied archive-specific resources and driven by the needs of both image submitters and image consumers. Quality archives of any type (traditional library, PubMed, refereed journals) require management and customer service. This paper describes the management tasks and user support model for TCIA.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Neuro-Oncology
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1522-8517
                1523-5866
                February 01 2021
                February 25 2021
                October 17 2020
                February 01 2021
                February 25 2021
                October 17 2020
                : 23
                : 2
                : 251-263
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                [2 ]Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
                [3 ]Department of Radiology, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey, USA
                [4 ]Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                [5 ]Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
                [6 ]Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                Article
                10.1093/neuonc/noaa231
                33068415
                2907a94e-cb41-4a5d-914c-5629cda5522d
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article