Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Residue behavior and risk assessment of afidopyropen and its metabolite M440I007 in tea

      , , , , , , , , ,
      Food Chemistry
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Tea consumption and disease correlations

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Afidopyropen: New and potent modulator of insect transient receptor potential channels.

            The commercial insecticides pymetrozine and pyrifluquinazon control plant-sucking pests by disturbing their coordination and ability to feed. We have previously shown that these compounds act by overstimulating and eventually silencing vanilloid-type transient receptor potential (TRPV) channels, which consist of two proteins, Nanchung and Inactive, that are co-expressed exclusively in insect chordotonal stretch receptor neurons. Here we show that a new insecticidal compound, afidopyropen, modulates chordotonal organs of American grasshoppers (Schistocerca americana) in the same fashion. Afidopyropen stimulated heterologously expressed TRPV channels from two different insect species - fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) and pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) - but did not affect function of the mammalian TRPV channel TRPV4. Activation of the insect TRPVs required simultaneous expression of both Nanchung and Inactive proteins. Tritium-labeled afidopyropen bound fruit fly TRPVs with higher affinity than pymetrozine and competed with pymetrozine for binding. Nanchung protein formed the main binding interface for afidopyropen, whereas co-expression of Inactive dramatically increased binding affinity. Another modulator of chordotonal organs, flonicamid, did not activate insect TRPV channels, nor did it compete with afidopyropen for binding, indicating that it has a different target site. These results define afidopyropen as a new, potent and specific modulator of insect TRPV channels, and provide insight into the unique binding mode of these compounds.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Leaching of pesticides in tea brew.

              A cup of tea that cheers can also be an important route of human exposure to pesticide residues. It is important to evaluate the percent transfer of pesticide residue from dried (made) tea to tea infusion, as tea is subjected to an infusion process prior to human consumption. To investigate the pesticide translocation, 13 pesticides commonly used on tea were studied by subjection of fortified teas to infusion. Analytes of interest were quantified by gas-liquid chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus and electron capture detectors. Interestingly, water solubility of pesticides did not necessarily indicate a shift of residues toward their preferential accumulation in infusion. The pesticides with larger partition coefficient (K(ow)) values remained nonextractable in infusing water. Further, boiling for longer periods (extended brewing time) resulted in higher transfer of pesticides to tea brew.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Food Chemistry
                Food Chemistry
                Elsevier BV
                03088146
                March 2023
                March 2023
                : 404
                : 134413
                Article
                10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134413
                2852577d-dd87-4186-845a-59c616aa883a
                © 2023

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-017

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-012

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article