9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mediators of change in cognitive behavior therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for eating disorders: A secondary analysis of a transdiagnostic randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Understanding the mechanisms of action of psychological treatments is a key first step in refining and developing more effective treatments. The present study examined hypothesized mediators of change of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT‐E) and interpersonal psychotherapy for eating disorders (IPT‐ED).

          Method

          A series of mediation studies were embedded in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing 20 weeks of CBT‐E and IPT‐ED in a transdiagnostic, non‐underweight sample of patients with eating disorders ( N = 130) consecutively referred to the service. Three hypothesized mediators of change in CBT‐E (regular eating, weighing frequency, and shape checking) and the key hypothesized mediator of IPT‐ED (interpersonal problem severity) were studied.

          Results

          The data supported regular eating as being a mediator of the effect of CBT‐E on binge‐eating frequency. The findings were inconclusive regarding the role of the other putative mediators of the effects of CBT‐E; and were similarly inconclusive for interpersonal problem severity as a mediator of the effect of IPT‐ED.

          Discussion

          This research highlights the potential benefits of embedding mediation studies within RCTs to better understand how treatments work. The findings supported the role of regular eating in reducing patients' binge‐eating frequency. Other key hypothesized mediators of CBT‐E and IPT‐ED were not supported, although the data were not inconsistent with them. Key methodological issues to address in future work include the need to capture both behavioral and cognitive processes of change in CBT‐E, and identifying key time points for change in IPT‐ED.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.

            A Monte Carlo study compared 14 methods to test the statistical significance of the intervening variable effect. An intervening variable (mediator) transmits the effect of an independent variable to a dependent variable. The commonly used R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny (1986) approach has low statistical power. Two methods based on the distribution of the product and 2 difference-in-coefficients methods have the most accurate Type I error rates and greatest statistical power except in 1 important case in which Type I error rates are too high. The best balance of Type I error and statistical power across all cases is the test of the joint significance of the two effects comprising the intervening variable effect.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling.

              R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny (1986; see record 1987-13085-001) provided clarion conceptual and methodological guidelines for testing mediational models with cross-sectional data. Graduating from cross-sectional to longitudinal designs enables researchers to make more rigorous inferences about the causal relations implied by such models. In this transition, misconceptions and erroneous assumptions are the norm. First, we describe some of the questions that arise (and misconceptions that sometimes emerge) in longitudinal tests of mediational models. We also provide a collection of tips for structural equation modeling (SEM) of mediational processes. Finally, we suggest a series of 5 steps when using SEM to test mediational processes in longitudinal designs: testing the measurement model, testing for added components, testing for omitted paths, testing the stationarity assumption, and estimating the mediational effects. ((c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                katy.sivyer@port.ac.uk
                Journal
                Int J Eat Disord
                Int J Eat Disord
                10.1002/(ISSN)1098-108X
                EAT
                The International Journal of Eating Disorders
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                0276-3478
                1098-108X
                05 November 2020
                December 2020
                : 53
                : 12 ( doiID: 10.1002/eat.v53.12 )
                : 1928-1940
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Psychiatry Oxford University Oxford UK
                [ 2 ] Department of Medical Statistics London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK
                [ 3 ]Present address: Department of Psychology University of Portsmouth Portsmouth UK
                [ 4 ]Present address: Centre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology University of Southampton Southampton UK
                [ 5 ]Present address: Department of Psychiatry Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
                [ 6 ]Present address: Department of Psychiatry Weill Cornell Medical College, New York‐Presbyterian Hospital White Plains New York USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Katy Sivyer, MSc, DPhil, Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, UK.

                Email: katy.sivyer@ 123456port.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-0102
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7963-656X
                Article
                EAT23390
                10.1002/eat.23390
                7756462
                33150640
                27f3c06e-06d7-4e1a-97bf-0ec14181d453
                © 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Eating Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 April 2020
                : 04 October 2020
                : 05 October 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Pages: 13, Words: 8656
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100010269;
                Award ID: 046386
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.6 mode:remove_FC converted:23.12.2020

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                cognitive behavior therapy,eating disorder,interpersonal psychotherapy,mediator,transdiagnostic,treatment personalization

                Comments

                Comment on this article