3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Intracortical current steering shifts the location of evoked neural activity

      , , ,
      Journal of Neural Engineering
      IOP Publishing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective. Intracortical visual prostheses are being developed to restore sight in people who are blind. The resolution of artificial vision is dictated by the location, proximity and number of electrodes implanted in the brain. However, increasing electrode count and proximity is traded off against tissue damage. Hence, new stimulation methods are needed that can improve the resolution of artificial vision without increasing the number of electrodes. We investigated whether a technique known as current steering can improve the resolution of artificial vision provided by intracortical prostheses without increasing the number of physical electrodes in the brain. Approach. We explored how the locus of neuronal activation could be steered when low amplitude microstimulation was applied simultaneously to two intracortical electrodes. A 64-channel, four-shank electrode array was implanted into the visual cortex of rats ( n = 7). The distribution of charge ranged from single-electrode stimulation (100%:0%) to an equal distribution between the two electrodes (50%:50%), thereby steering the current between the physical electrodes. The stimulating electrode separation varied between 300 and 500 μm. The peak of the evoked activity was defined as the ‘virtual electrode’ location. Main results. Current steering systematically shifted the virtual electrode on average between the stimulating electrodes as the distribution of charge was moved from one stimulating electrode to another. This effect was unclear in single trials due to the limited sampling of neurons. A model that scales the cortical response to each physical electrode when stimulated in isolation predicts the evoked virtual electrode response. Virtual electrodes were found to elicit a neural response as effectively and predictably as physical electrodes within cortical tissue on average. Significance. Current steering could be used to increase the resolution of intracortical electrode arrays without altering the number of physical electrodes which will reduce neural tissue damage, power consumption and potential heat dispersion issues.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neuronal circuits of the neocortex.

          We explore the extent to which neocortical circuits generalize, i.e., to what extent can neocortical neurons and the circuits they form be considered as canonical? We find that, as has long been suspected by cortical neuroanatomists, the same basic laminar and tangential organization of the excitatory neurons of the neocortex is evident wherever it has been sought. Similarly, the inhibitory neurons show characteristic morphology and patterns of connections throughout the neocortex. We offer a simple model of cortical processing that is consistent with the major features of cortical circuits: The superficial layer neurons within local patches of cortex, and within areas, cooperate to explore all possible interpretations of different cortical input and cooperatively select an interpretation consistent with their various cortical and subcortical inputs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review.

            J Ranck (1975)
            (1) There are data on the amount of current necessary to stimulate a myelinated fiber or cell body and/or its axon a given distance away from a monopolar electrode over the entire range of practical interest for intracranial stimulation. Data do not exist for other electrode configurations. (2) Currents from a monopolar cathode of more than 8 times threshold may block action potentials in axons. Therefore, only axons lying in a shell around the electrode are stimulated. Elements very close to the electrode may not be stimulated. Close to an electrode small diameter axons may be stimulated and larger ones may not be. (3) Most, and perhaps all, CNS myelinated fibers have chronaxies of 50-100 musec. When gray matter is stimulated, the chronaxie is often 200-700 musec. It is not clear what is being stimulated in this case. Current-duration relations should be determined for many more responses. (4) There are no current-distance or current-duration data for central finely myelinated or unmyelinated fibers. (5) It takes less cathodal current than anodal to stimulate a myelinated fiber passing by a monopolar electrode. When a monopolar electrode is near a cell body, on the opposite side from the axon, often the lowest threshold is anodal, but sometimes cathodal. Stimulation of a neuron near its cell body is not well understood, but in many cases the axon is probably stimulated. (6) Orientation of cell body and axons with respect to current flow is important. For an axon it is the component of the voltage gradient parallel to the fiber that is important. (7) The pia has a significant resistance and capacitance. Gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid have different resistivities, which affect patterns of current flow. (8) More is known about stimulation of mammalian CNS than most workers are aware of. Much of what is unknown seems solvable with current methods.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Direct activation of sparse, distributed populations of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation.

              For over a century, electrical microstimulation has been the most direct method for causally linking brain function with behavior. Despite this long history, it is still unclear how the activity of neural populations is affected by stimulation. For example, there is still no consensus on where activated cells lie or on the extent to which neural processes such as passing axons near the electrode are also activated. Past studies of this question have proven difficult because microstimulation interferes with electrophysiological recordings, which in any case provide only coarse information about the location of activated cells. We used two-photon calcium imaging, an optical method, to circumvent these hurdles. We found that microstimulation sparsely activates neurons around the electrode, sometimes as far as millimeters away, even at low currents. Our results indicate that the pattern of activated neurons likely arises from the direct activation of axons in a volume tens of microns in diameter.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of Neural Engineering
                J. Neural Eng.
                IOP Publishing
                1741-2560
                1741-2552
                June 23 2022
                June 01 2022
                June 23 2022
                June 01 2022
                : 19
                : 3
                : 035003
                Article
                10.1088/1741-2552/ac77bf
                27ef76de-35bb-4b9f-a1ff-bfdf8b0b6624
                © 2022

                https://iopscience.iop.org/page/copyright

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article