0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effects of early time restricted eating plus daily caloric restriction compared to daily caloric restriction alone on continuous glucose levels

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The median eating duration in the U.S. is 14.75 h, spread throughout the period of wakefulness and ending before sleep. Food intake at an inappropriate circadian time may lead to adverse metabolic outcomes. Emerging literature suggests that time restricted eating (TRE) may improve glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. The aim was to compare 24‐h glucose profiles and insulin sensitivity in participants after completing 12 weeks of a behavioral weight loss intervention based on early TRE plus daily caloric restriction (E‐TRE+DCR) or DCR alone.

          Methods

          Eighty‐one adults with overweight or obesity (age 18–50 years, BMI 25–45 kg/m 2) were randomized to either E‐TRE+DCR or DCR alone. Each participant wore a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) for 7 days and insulin sensitivity was estimated using the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR) at Baseline and Week 12. Changes in CGM‐derived measures and HOMA‐IR from Baseline to Week 12 were assessed within and between groups using random intercept mixed models.

          Results

          Forty‐four participants had valid CGM data at both time points, while 38 had valid glucose, insulin, HOMA‐IR, and hemoglobin A1c (A1c) data at both timepoints. There were no significant differences in sex, age, BMI, or the percentage of participants with prediabetes between the groups (28% female, age 39.2 ± 6.9 years, BMI 33.8 ± 5.7 kg/m 2, 16% with prediabetes). After adjusting for weight, there were no between‐group differences in changes in overall average sensor glucose, standard deviation of glucose levels, the coefficient of variation of glucose levels, daytime or nighttime average sensor glucose, fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA‐IR, or A1c. However, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions changed differently over time between the two groups, with a greater reduction found in the DCR as compared to E‐TRE+DCR ( p = 0.03).

          Conclusion

          There were no major differences between E‐TRE+DCR and DCR groups in continuous glucose profiles or insulin sensitivity 12 weeks after the intervention. Because the study sample included participants with normal baseline mean glucose profiles and insulin sensitivity, the ability to detect changes in these outcomes may have been limited.

          Abstract

          The aim was to compare 24‐h glucose profiles and insulin sensitivity in 44 adult participants with overweight or obesity completing a 12‐week behavioral intervention based on early time restricted eating plus daily caloric restriction (E‐TRE+DCR) or DCR alone. After adjusting for weight loss from the intervention, there were no between‐group differences in changes in overall average sensor glucose, standard deviation of glucose levels, the coefficient of variation of glucose levels, daytime or nighttime average sensor glucose, fasting glucose, insulin, homeostatic model of insulin resistance, or hemoglobin A1c although mean amplitude of glycemic excursions changed differently over time between the two groups, with a greater reduction found in the DCR as compared toE‐TRE+DCR ( p = 0.03). Because the study sample included participants with normal baseline mean glucose profiles and insulin sensitivity, the ability to detect changes in these outcomes may have been limited.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man.

          The steady-state basal plasma glucose and insulin concentrations are determined by their interaction in a feedback loop. A computer-solved model has been used to predict the homeostatic concentrations which arise from varying degrees beta-cell deficiency and insulin resistance. Comparison of a patient's fasting values with the model's predictions allows a quantitative assessment of the contributions of insulin resistance and deficient beta-cell function to the fasting hyperglycaemia (homeostasis model assessment, HOMA). The accuracy and precision of the estimate have been determined by comparison with independent measures of insulin resistance and beta-cell function using hyperglycaemic and euglycaemic clamps and an intravenous glucose tolerance test. The estimate of insulin resistance obtained by homeostasis model assessment correlated with estimates obtained by use of the euglycaemic clamp (Rs = 0.88, p less than 0.0001), the fasting insulin concentration (Rs = 0.81, p less than 0.0001), and the hyperglycaemic clamp, (Rs = 0.69, p less than 0.01). There was no correlation with any aspect of insulin-receptor binding. The estimate of deficient beta-cell function obtained by homeostasis model assessment correlated with that derived using the hyperglycaemic clamp (Rs = 0.61, p less than 0.01) and with the estimate from the intravenous glucose tolerance test (Rs = 0.64, p less than 0.05). The low precision of the estimates from the model (coefficients of variation: 31% for insulin resistance and 32% for beta-cell deficit) limits its use, but the correlation of the model's estimates with patient data accords with the hypothesis that basal glucose and insulin interactions are largely determined by a simple feed back loop.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Time-restricted feeding without reducing caloric intake prevents metabolic diseases in mice fed a high-fat diet.

              While diet-induced obesity has been exclusively attributed to increased caloric intake from fat, animals fed a high-fat diet (HFD) ad libitum (ad lib) eat frequently throughout day and night, disrupting the normal feeding cycle. To test whether obesity and metabolic diseases result from HFD or disruption of metabolic cycles, we subjected mice to either ad lib or time-restricted feeding (tRF) of a HFD for 8 hr per day. Mice under tRF consume equivalent calories from HFD as those with ad lib access yet are protected against obesity, hyperinsulinemia, hepatic steatosis, and inflammation and have improved motor coordination. The tRF regimen improved CREB, mTOR, and AMPK pathway function and oscillations of the circadian clock and their target genes' expression. These changes in catabolic and anabolic pathways altered liver metabolome and improved nutrient utilization and energy expenditure. We demonstrate in mice that tRF regimen is a nonpharmacological strategy against obesity and associated diseases. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Elizabeth.Thomas@cuanschutz.edu
                Journal
                Obes Sci Pract
                Obes Sci Pract
                10.1002/(ISSN)2055-2238
                OSP4
                Obesity Science & Practice
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2055-2238
                04 August 2023
                February 2024
                : 10
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/osp4.v10.1 )
                : e702
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes Department of Medicine University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA
                [ 2 ] Anschutz Health & Wellness Center at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Biostatistics and Informatics Colorado School of Public Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA
                [ 4 ] Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases Department of Medicine Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
                [ 5 ] Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Administration Aurora Colorado USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Elizabeth A. Thomas, 12348 E. Montview Blvd, Mailstop C263, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

                Email: Elizabeth.Thomas@ 123456cuanschutz.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6884-7748
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-6261
                Article
                OSP4702
                10.1002/osp4.702
                10804344
                38264001
                27762344-3121-49ed-9343-0c9dda4884b1
                © 2023 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by World Obesity and The Obesity Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 14 July 2023
                : 14 April 2023
                : 18 July 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Pages: 13, Words: 8131
                Funding
                Funded by: National Center for Research Resources , doi 10.13039/100000097;
                Award ID: UL1 RR025780
                Funded by: Doris Duke Charitable Foundation , doi 10.13039/100000862;
                Award ID: 2015212
                Funded by: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases , doi 10.13039/100000062;
                Award ID: F32 DK123878
                Award ID: K01 DK113063
                Award ID: KL2 TR002534
                Award ID: R21 DK117499
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.6 mode:remove_FC converted:23.01.2024

                behavioral strategies,caloric restriction,continuous glucose monitoring,insulin sensitivity,time restricted eating,weight management

                Comments

                Comment on this article