25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The Value of Codesign : The Effect of Customer Involvement in Service Design Teams

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4
      Journal of Service Research
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Groups in Context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research.

              This article presents a meta-analysis of team-level antecedents of creativity and innovation in the workplace. Using a general input-process-output model, the authors examined 15 team-level variables researched in primary studies published over the last 30 years and their relation to creativity and innovation. An exhaustive search of the international innovation literature resulted in a final sample (k) of 104 independent studies. Results revealed that team process variables of support for innovation, vision, task orientation, and external communication displayed the strongest relationships with creativity and innovation (rhos between 0.4 and 0.5). Input variables (i.e., team composition and structure) showed weaker effect sizes. Moderator analyses confirmed that relationships differ substantially depending on measurement method (self-ratings vs. independent ratings of innovation) and measurement level (individual vs. team innovation). Team variables displayed considerably stronger relationships with self-report measures of innovation compared with independent ratings and objective criteria. Team process variables were more strongly related to creativity and innovation measured at the team than the individual level. Implications for future research and pragmatic ramifications for organizational practice are discussed in conclusion.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of Service Research
                Journal of Service Research
                SAGE Publications
                1094-6705
                1552-7379
                May 31 2017
                February 2018
                July 10 2017
                February 2018
                : 21
                : 1
                : 75-100
                Affiliations
                [1 ]CTF Service Research Center, Karlstads Universitet, Karlstad, Sweden
                [2 ]Swinburne Business School, Swinburne University, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
                [3 ]School of Management, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
                [4 ]Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
                Article
                10.1177/1094670517714060
                272e4326-09bd-4a7e-9339-42aad73a1210
                © 2018

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article