7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Porcine Aorto-Renal Artery (PARA) model for laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: the evolution of a training model to meet new clinical needs

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The transcystic approach to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration has gained popularity for the single-stage management of choledocholithiasis with concomitant gallstones. Our team previously described the use of a porcine aorta segment to simulate the common bile duct during laparoscopic skill training.

          Methods

          With the advent of the transcystic approach as a contender for the first-line technique of accessing the common bile duct, we present an evolution of the laparoscopic training model using a Porcine Aorta-Renal Artery (PARA) specimen to simulate the structural integrity, dimensions and spatial distribution of both the human cystic and common bile ducts.

          Results

          This training model allows the use of a choledochoscope for transcystic exploration of the biliary tree. It combines fidelity and reproducibility required for a simulated training model to offer experience in laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration. Validation of the model was demonstrated by 21 surgeons who completed a questionnaire after performing the simulated procedure. In all sections assessing reliability, face validity and content validity of the model, mean rating scores were between 4 and 5 out of five (good or excellent).

          Conclusions

          We present the evolution of an established training model for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration which focusses the attention on the transcystic approach to the common bile duct and the use of lithotripsy techniques. The need for such a model reflects the shift in the current practice of the laparoendoscopic management of choledocholithiasis with concomitant gallstones from transductal to transcystic approach.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-020-02045-0.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) global rating scale to evaluate the skills of surgical trainees in the operating room

          Purpose The education of surgical trainees should be based on an accurate evaluation of their surgical skill levels. In our hospital, the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) is used for this purpose. We conducted this study to demonstrate the validity and accuracy of the OSATS for assessing surgical skills in the operating room (OR) setting. Methods Between January, 2007 and December, 2010, the OSATS global rating scale was used to assess several operations in which surgical trainees participated. We assessed ten surgical trainees who participated as the main surgeon or first assistant, and studied the correlation between their postgraduate year and their OSATS score. Results The median score of the global rating scale for each trainee improved with each year of experience. The median scores of all trainees in postgraduate years 3, 4, and 5 were significantly different (p < 0.001 for both the main surgeon and first assistant roles; Kruskal–Wallis test). Conclusion Using the OSATS global rating scale to assess the surgical skills of trainees in the OR was feasible and effective.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of 4 Combinations of Laparoscopic and Intraoperative Techniques for Management of Gallstone Disease With Biliary Duct Calculi

            Question What technique is best for surgical management of gallstone disease with biliary duct calculi? Findings In this systematic review and network meta-analysis of 20 randomized clinical trials that included 2489 unique patients and 4 surgical techniques combining laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a second technique, the rendezvous approach (laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus intraoperative cholangiopancreatography) was associated with the highest rates of safety and success compared with the other approaches. Meaning The rendezvous approach should be the first choice for patients with gallstone disease and biliary duct calculi. Importance Several techniques are used for surgical treatment of gallstone disease with biliary duct calculi, but the safety and efficacy of these approaches have not been compared. Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of 4 surgical approaches to gallstone disease with biliary duct calculi. Data Sources MEDLINE, Scopus, and ISI-Web of Science databases, articles published between 1950 and 2017 and searched from August 12, 2017, to September 14, 2017. Search terms used were LCBDE , LC , preoperative , ERCP , postoperative , period , cholangiopancreatography , endoscopic , retrograde , rendezvous , intraoperative , one-stage , two-stage , single-stage , gallstone , gallstones , calculi , stone , therapy , treatment , therapeutics , surgery , surgical , procedures , clinical trials as topic, random , and allocation in several logical combinations. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials comparing at least 2 of the following strategies: preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (PreERCP) plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC); LC with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCDBE); LC plus intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (IntraERCP); and LC plus postoperative ERCP (PostERCP). Data Extraction and Synthesis A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was performed. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to show the probability that each approach would be the best for each outcome. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were the safety to efficacy ratio using overall mortality and morbidity rates as the main indicators of safety and the success rate as an indicator of efficacy. Secondary outcomes were acute pancreatitis, biliary leak, overall bleeding, operative time, length of hospital stay, total cost, and readmission rate. Results The 20 trials comprised 2489 patients (and 2489 procedures). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus IntraERCP had the highest probability of being the most successful (SUCRA, 87.2%) and safest (SUCRA, 69.7%) with respect to morbidity. All approaches had similar results regarding overall mortality. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus LCBDE was the most successful for avoiding overall bleeding (SUCRA, 83.3%) and for the shortest operative time (SUCRA, 90.2%) and least total cost (SUCRA, 98.9%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus IntraERCP was the best approach for length of hospital stay (SUCRA, 92.7%). Inconsistency was found in operative time (indirect estimate, 19.05; 95% CI, 2.44-35.66; P  = .02) and total cost (indirect estimate, 17.06; 95% CI, 3.56-107.21; P  = .04). Heterogeneity was observed for success rate (τ, 0.8), operative time (τ, >1), length of stay (τ, >1), and total cost (τ, >1). Conclusions and Relevance The combined LC and IntraERCP approach had the greatest odds to be the safest and appears to be the most successful. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus LBCDE appears to reduce the risk of acute pancreatitis but may be associated with a higher risk of biliary leak. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares 4 surgical strategies that combine laparoscopic cholecystectomy and a second technique to assess which strategy is most successful in patients with gallstone disease with common bile duct stones.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              LapTrain: multi-modality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy—results of a randomized controlled trial

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                a.isla@imperial.ac.uk
                Journal
                Langenbecks Arch Surg
                Langenbecks Arch Surg
                Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1435-2443
                1435-2451
                17 February 2021
                17 February 2021
                2021
                : 406
                : 4
                : 1149-1154
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.416568.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0398 9627, Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, , Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, ; Watford Road, Harrow, London, HA1 3UJ UK
                [2 ]Defence Medical Services, Birmingham, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.7445.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2113 8111, Department of Surgery and Cancer, , Imperial College London, ; London, UK
                [4 ]Hospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
                [5 ]GRID grid.411258.b, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, ; Salamanca, Spain
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6160-7047
                Article
                2045
                10.1007/s00423-020-02045-0
                8208912
                33595704
                27206c5f-cec1-44a1-a2d7-66b3254c6ff4
                © Crown 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 26 May 2020
                : 25 November 2020
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021

                Surgery
                choledocholithiasis,common bile duct stones,laparoscopic common bile duct exploration,laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration,porcine aorta-renal artery model

                Comments

                Comment on this article