0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Using fluorescence index (FI) of dissolved organic matter (DOM) to identify non-point source pollution: The difference in FI between soil extracts and wastewater reveals the principle.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Traceability and quantification of agricultural non-point source pollution are of great significance to water pollution management in watersheds. In this study, fluorescence components and indices of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the river, wastewater and soil extracts from different land use types were analyzed to screen indicators that can identify non-point source pollution in 15 independent small watersheds located at the southern Qinling piedmont (China). The results showed that DOM fluorescence components in soil extracts among different land uses didn't have significant differences. The values of humification index (HIX) did not vary obviously between soil extracts and wastewater, with the mean values ranging from 3.4 to 3.9. However, the average value of fluorescence index (FI) of effluent wastewater was about 2.1 and did not change significantly through treatment. The FI values of soil extracts were generally between 1.5 and 1.7. The FI values in most river waters were just between the FI values of wastewater and soil extracts. This phenomenon indicated that FI could be used as an indicator to distinguish point source and non-point source pollution. Besides, the correlation analysis showed a significant positive relationship between the non-point source pollution calculated by FI and δ15N. The relationship was different in January and July, but further confirmed the reliability of using FI to quantify non-point source pollution. This study demonstrated the feasibility of using FI to identify non-point source pollution. When combined with handheld fluorescence spectrometers and unmanned aerial vehicle-mounted fluorescence spectrometers, this method may be adopted more widely.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Sci Total Environ
          The Science of the total environment
          Elsevier BV
          1879-1026
          0048-9697
          Mar 01 2023
          : 862
          Affiliations
          [1 ] College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, PR China.
          [2 ] Shaanxi Provincial Academy of Environmental Science, Xi'an 710061, PR China.
          [3 ] College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, PR China. Electronic address: lileaf@nwsuaf.edu.cn.
          [4 ] Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, Victoria 8001, Australia.
          [5 ] School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.
          Article
          S0048-9697(22)07951-7
          10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160848
          36526171
          26bdb124-6663-49be-87f4-eff8b23cf2b1
          History

          Land use,Nitrogen,Non-point source pollution,δ(15)N,Fluorescence indices

          Comments

          Comment on this article