0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Inter‐ and intra‐rater agreement of interpretation of functional lumen imaging probe in healthy subjects

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) evaluates esophagogastric junction (EGJ) opening and esophageal contractility. Both post hoc and real‐time analyses are possible, but reproducibility and reliability of analysis remain undefined. This study assesses inter‐ and intra‐rater agreement of normative FLIP measurements among novice and experienced users.

          Methods

          Eight motility experts from different institutions independently evaluated de‐identified video recordings from 27 asymptomatic healthy subjects using FLIP. Interpretation methods simulating a post‐procedure and a live procedure setting were tested. Novice FLIP users ( n = 3) received training prior to post‐procedure interpretation. Experienced FLIP users ( n = 5) interpreted using both methods. Users recorded maximum EGJ and distal esophageal body diameter, distensive pressure, and EGJ distensibility index (EGJ‐DI), at balloon fill volumes of 50‐, 60‐, and 70 ml, as well as repetitive antegrade contractions (RACs). Inter‐ and intra‐rater agreements of diameters, distensive pressure and EGJ‐DI were assessed by intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC). Percentage agreement evaluated inter‐ and intra‐rater reliability for RACs.

          Key Results

          Novice and experienced users acquired normative FLIP metrics. Good‐to‐excellent inter‐ and intra‐rater reliability were achieved for all variables at 60 ml balloon fill volumes. Median parameters at 60 ml balloon fill volume were as follows: EGJ‐DI 5.5 mm 2/mmHg, maximum EGJ diameter 18.6 mm, distensive pressure at maximum EGJ diameter 48.1 mmHg, and distal esophageal body diameter 19.5 mm.

          Conclusions and Inferences

          Normative FLIP parameters can be reliably extracted from FLIP videos using both real‐time and post hoc analyses, with high reliability between experienced and novice users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Esophageal motility disorders on high‐resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0 ©

            Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) is the updated classification scheme for esophageal motility disorders using metrics from high-resolution manometry (HRM). Fifty-two diverse international experts separated into seven working subgroups utilized formal validated methodologies over two-years to develop CCv4.0. Key updates in CCv.4.0 consist of a more rigorous and expansive HRM protocol that incorporates supine and upright test positions as well as provocative testing, a refined definition of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO), more stringent diagnostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and description of baseline EGJ metrics. Further, the CCv4.0 sought to define motility disorder diagnoses as conclusive and inconclusive based on associated symptoms, and findings on provocative testing as well as supportive testing with barium esophagram with tablet and/or functional lumen imaging probe. These changes attempt to minimize ambiguity in prior iterations of Chicago Classification and provide more standardized and rigorous criteria for patterns of disorders of peristalsis and obstruction at the EGJ.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use of the Functional Lumen Imaging Probe in Clinical Esophagology.

              The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) measures luminal dimensions using impedance planimetry, performed most often during sedated upper endoscopy. Mechanical properties of the esophageal wall and opening dynamics of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) can be objectively evaluated in esophageal motor disorders, eosinophilic esophagitis, esophageal strictures, during esophageal surgery and in postsurgical symptomatic states. Distensibility index, the ratio of EGJ cross sectional area to intraballoon pressure, is the most useful FLIP metric. Secondary peristalsis from balloon distension can be displayed topographically as repetitive anterograde or retrograde contractile activity in the esophageal body, similar to high-resolution manometry. Real-time interpretation and postprocessing of FLIP metadata can complement the identification of esophageal outflow obstruction and achalasia, especially when findings are inconclusive from alternate esophageal tests in symptomatic patients. FLIP can complement the diagnosis of achalasia when manometry and barium studies are inconclusive or negative in patients with typical symptoms. FLIP can direct adequacy of disruption of the EGJ in achalasia when used during and immediately after myotomy and pneumatic dilation. Lumen diameter measured using FLIP in eosinophilic esophagitis and in complex strictures can potentially guide management. An abbreviated modification of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation was used to determine the quality of available evidence and recommendations regarding FLIP utilization. FLIP metrics that are diagnostic or suggestive of an abnormal motor pattern and metrics that define normal esophageal physiology were developed by consensus and are described in this review.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Neurogastroenterology & Motility
                Neurogastroenterology Motil
                Wiley
                1350-1925
                1365-2982
                March 2023
                December 08 2022
                March 2023
                : 35
                : 3
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Division of Gastroenterology University of California, San Diego School of Medicine La Jolla California USA
                [2 ] Division of Gastroenterology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA
                [3 ] Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
                [4 ] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Metro Health Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
                [5 ] Center for Esophageal Health, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology NYU Langone Health New York New York USA
                [6 ] Medtronic Minneapolis Minnesota USA
                [7 ] Joy McCann Culverhouse Center for Esophageal and Swallowing Disorders University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine Tampa Florida USA
                [8 ] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Mayo Clinic Scottsdale Arizona USA
                [9 ] Division of Gastroenterology Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA
                [10 ] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA
                Article
                10.1111/nmo.14505
                2673e286-5822-4b6a-9233-e95900043b9e
                © 2023

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article